 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This Issue:
2 LARGE Photos of the 6 Protestants
of the Vatican 2 Concilium
who ACTIVELY helped to make
up the
synthesized and updated
16th Century Protestant Supper-Memorial-Meal
Pope Paul 6 Calls the
Novus Ordo Missae (New
Rite of Mass)
Welcome to this first issue of Catholic of 1997 A.D.!
Below are two photos of the 6 Protestants who had a very active role in helping to piece together a synthesized and updated 16th Century Protestant Supper-Memorial-Meal which Pope Paul 6 called the Novus Ordo Missae (New Rite of Mass).
Although most "Traditional Catholics" are probably familiar with the first photo, most other Catholics are not. In addition, We have never seen the second photograph anywhere except in the original Newspaper edition. Therefore, it is most probable that very few of you have ever seen this second photograph.
We will put Our comments under each photograph.
Happy reading and God bless you!
Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam!
Photo Taken on Friday, April 10, 1970 A.D. in the Vatican
These SIX PROTESTANTS are, from left to right:
2) Canon Jasper;
3) Dr. Shephard;
4) Dr. Konneth;
5) Dr. Smith; and,
6) Brother Max Thurian (in white), who is standing next to Pope Paul 6 (in white).
The synthesis of the updated 16th Century PROTESTANT Supper-Memorial-Meal (which was actually the infamous Memorial Meal of Berengar of Tours and Scotus Erugena which was condemned by the Roman Catholic Church in the 11th Century), the Novus Ordo Rite, which is now used in the United States and in many other countries as the New Mass, which Pope Paul 6 calls the Novus Ordo Missae, was made up in part by the very active SIX PROTESTANT members of the Synod Vatican 2 Consilium. The Pope was obviously very proud of their work. So proud in fact that he had his photo taken with them on Friday, April 10, 1970 A.D., in the Vatican and is shown, in the photo below, shaking their hands as a gesture of congratulations!
It has been said that a picture is worth a thousand words. This photograph is worth at least a million words which proves why the New Mass is an updated PROTESTANT LITURGY which contains only the mere shadow of the CATHOLIC Rite of Mass!
It should be clear from all of this that real Catholics can NOT go to such non-Catholic seder-suppers or memorial meals (which sincere Catholics, trying to be faithful to their Holy Catholic Faith, call a "mass"), despite the fact that they may be held in what used to be "Catholic" Church buildings!
For those of you who are sincere Catholics and who are trying to do the right thing and who would say that you must trust and obey the Pope, just remember this next photograph of the Pope (shown below), in this case one of the founders of the VATICAN 2 church , Pope Paul 6, in which the infallible Pope is seen congratulating one of the six Protestant members of the Concilium which made up this updated, synthesized, man-made, 16th Century Protestant liturgical supper or memorial meal which sincere, but victimized Catholics, think is the Mass!
This updated, synthesized, man-made, 16th Century Protestant liturgical supper or memorial meal, which Pope Paul 6 calls the Novus Ordo Missae, which is the new Mass now used around the world, was condemned as anti-Catholic by two Cardinals!
They wrote in part that the Novus Ordo represents, both as a whole and in its details, a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as it was formulated in Session XXII of the Council of Trent. The "canons" of the rite definitively fixed at that time provided an insurmountable barrier to any heresy directed against the integrity of the Mystery (Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani and Antonio Cardinal Bacci, Letter to Pope Paul 6, Thursday, September 25, 1969).
Photo # 2:
Let all sincere and faithful Catholics burn this photograph into their memories:
Photo Taken on Friday, April 10, 1970 A.D. in the Vatican
IF you would like to know the source of this photograph, it is from the Pope's official newspaper, the L'OSSERVATORE ROMANO, Weekly Edition in English, Third Year, N. 17 (108) - Thursday, APRIL 23, 1970, A.D. page # 2.
This photo of Friday, April 10, 1970 A.D. fully shows four of the six Protestants who are, from left to right:
1) Dr. George (shown shaking hands with Pope Paul 6);
2) Canon Jasper;
3) Dr. Shephard;
4) Dr. Konneth (the Pope's head is blocking most of Dr. Konneth although the top of his head is slightly visible);
5) Dr. Smith
Some of you may object to our above statement that " the Novus Ordo Rite, which is now used in the United States and in many other countries as the New Mass, which Pope Paul 6 calls the Novus Ordo Missae, was made up in part by the very active SIX PROTESTANT members of the Synod Vatican 2 Consilium. " by saying that these Six "non-Catholic Observers", as the photo caption reads, were only that, namely "observers"?!
On the contrary, here are a few excerpts from a speech by Pope Paul 6 on Friday, April 10, 1970 A.D. given in his Audience to the members of the Synod Vatican 2 Concilium with our comments in blue and (in parenthesis):
The Pope's own Newspaper declared: Pope commends work of "Consilium" and went on to print the Speech of the Pope who said in part:
"Venerable Brothers
("Among the many members of the Hierarchy present at the audience were Cardinals: Lercaro, Gracias. Giobbe, Confalonieri, Rugambwa, Felici, Gray, Enrique y Tarancon, and Willebrands.")
and dear sons,
(the context clearly indicates this includes the Six Protestant "Observers" as proven from the first above photo which shows: 1. Dr. George; 2. Canon Jasper; 3. Dr. Shephard; 4. Dr. Konneth; 5. Dr. Smith; and, 6. Brother Max Thurian. It should be noted that to have ignored them would have been seen as a breach of protocol and a rude snub and insult.
On the contrary, that they were present and included in this Speech is proven by the above two photos in which they were not excluded, but included! It is only logical that if they were deliberately included at the Audience and included in the photo that they were likewise deliberately included in this Speech!
For those of you who want something more precise, you are left to fault the usual, and seemingly deliberate, ambiguous and equivocal style of Paul 6 in the classical use of ambiguity and equivocity by Modernists which itself casts the shadow of the heresy of Modernism over Paul 6 and but tends to prove Our case even further-especially when one compares this ambiguity and equivocity with the ambiguity and equivocity he has used when writing on matters of Faith where he tends to be even more ambiguous and equivocal!)
We are glad to give you
(this you includes the Six Protestants)
a heartfelt greeting, and to speak to you
(this you includes the Six Protestants)
... the work accomplished by you
(this you includes the Six Protestants)
in these years, We are impelled to offer you
(this you includes the Six Protestants)
a full measure of thanks for so great and so many labours. For you
(this you includes the Six Protestants)
were prompt and diligent, as well as expert,
(this expert includes the Six Protestants)
in dealing with a matter that was complicated and very difficult--and without expecting any reward, but seeking only to be of service to the Church
(exactly WHICH Church??? -certainly not the Roman Catholic Church because she forbids changes to the Missal per the infallible decree of Pope St. Pius V under the penalty of automatic excommunication! and she forbids changes to the Mass per the infallible Canons of the Council of Trent, especially Session 22 on the Mass under penalty of automatic excommunication!. We call this "Church" The VATICAN 2 church!)
This work of yours
(this you includes the Six Protestants)
was indeed arduous; documents had to be drawn up by which that Constitution of the Council [Vatican 2] would be gradually
(notice his admission of what Cardinal Heenan had said about this gradual implementation! "Why does the Mass keep changing? Here is the answer... It would have been foolhardy to introduce all the changes at once. It was obviously wise to change gradually and gently. If all the changes had been introduced together, you would have been shocked." [Cardinal Heenan, Lenten Pastoral Letter, Sunday, October 12, 1969 A.D.])
put into effect...
(Besides being "shocked", Roman Catholics would have REJECTED the Novus Ordo Missae because the changes would have been more obvious! In addition, The VATICAN 2 church would never have seen the light of day!)
In the light of these difficulties, it is remarkable that so many things have already been achieved and completed
(The work of the 16th Century Protestants was virtually culminated and completed with the Novus Ordo Missae, and the other changes effected in part by these Six Protestants and the Modernist Vatican 2 church Pope, Cardinals and Bishops of the 20th Century, which was condemned a priori by the Council of Trent!)
To mention only the main points, let Us note
(Modernist Paul 6 enumerates some of these other changes:)
[1] the many Instructions and other documents edited, and
[2] books of a subsidiary nature written by some of your
(does this your include one or more of the Six Protestants?)
members;
[3] the new [Novus] Ordo Missae;
(For this act Pope Paul 6, as well as many members of the Hierarchy, including Cardinals: Lercaro, Gracias. Giobbe, Confalonieri, Rugambwa, Felici, Gray, Enrique y Tarancon, and Willebrands, were all automatically excommunicated by some of the Canons of Session 22 of the Council of Trent on the Mass.
All of them were also automatically excommunicated by the Quo Primum Tempore of Pope St. Pius V!)
[4] the variations introduced into the Liturgy of Holy Week;
(For this act Pope Paul 6 as well as many members of the Hierarchy, including Cardinals: Lercaro, Gracias. Giobbe, Confalonieri, Rugambwa, Felici, Gray, Enrique y Tarancon, and Willebrands, were all automatically excommunicated by some of the Canons of Session 22 of the Council of Trent on the Mass.
All of them were also automatically excommunicated by the Quo Primum Tempore of Pope St. Pius V!)
[5] the Rites of Baptism for Infants,
[6] of Diaconate,
[7] Priesthood,
[8] Episcopate, and
[9] Matrimony;
[10] the order of readings for Mass;
[11] Rites of Exequies, and
[12[ for Religious Profession;
[13] the Roman Calendar.
[14] Soon also, after much hard work, the Roman Missal will be published
(For this act Pope Paul 6 as well as many members of the Hierarchy, including Cardinals: Lercaro, Gracias. Giobbe, Confalonieri, Rugambwa, Felici, Gray, Enrique y Tarancon, and Willebrands, were all automatically excommunicated by some of the Canons of Session 22 of the Council of Trent on the Mass.
All of them were also automatically excommunicated by the Quo Primum Tempore of Pope St. Pius V!)
to be followed by (among other things)
[15] the Roman Breviary,
[16] the Rites for Confirmation and
[17] for the Baptism of adults,
[18] the revised Roman Martyrology,
[19] the second "Liber Pontificalis", and
[20] the Roman book of Ceremonies (Caeremoniale).
All this work
(they were certainly busy bees to do all of these 20 things!)
of yours
(this yours includes the Six Protestants)
incorporates the principles approved by the Council's [Vatican 2's] Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy. For indeed it was from this, which we may call the "Magna Charta" of liturgical renewal...
(For this Magna Charta of Modernism, Pope Paul 6, as well as many members of the Hierarchy, including Cardinals: Lercaro, Gracias. Giobbe, Confalonieri, Rugambwa, Felici, Gray, Enrique y Tarancon, and Willebrands, were all automatically excommunicated by some of the Canons of Session 22 of the Council of Trent on the Mass.
(All of them were also automatically excommunicated by the Quo Primum Tempore of Pope St. Pius V!)
(In addition, they all came under the automatic excommunication of Pope St. Pius X against the members of the heresy of Modernism!)
You have made a special effort to see that ... "lex orandi" might correspond more aptly with the "lex credendi"...
(Here Pope Paul 6 publicly admits that he is one of the founders of The VATICAN 2 church! In the official "mass" liturgy of The VATICAN 2 church!, by official definition, the Catholic teaching of the Mass as a mystical renewal of the bloody sacrifice of the Cross on Calvary is replaced by the Protestant memorial supper meal - which heresy has been condemned by the Roman Catholic Church, both in the 11th Century at three Synods and in the 16th Century by the Council of Trent!)
(Because the law of praying is the law of believing - the lex orandi and the lex credendi - in the Novus Ordo Missae - in all languages, including Latin - omits Mysterium Fidei - Mystery of Faith - which is the transubstantiation - as even Pope Paul 6 has admitted , then not only is the Form for the Consecration of the Most Precious Blood invalidated by this fact, but so also is this liturgical rite - the Novus Ordo Missae - invalidated! In reality, The VATICAN 2 church itself, for these and other reasons, e.g., that it is a man-made and man-centered "church", is invalid as well!)
Thus it happily comes about that...
Since this Consilium of yours
(This yours includes the Six Protestants - but it is somewhat of a misleading phrase since here it seems to indicate that Pope Paul 6 had no active role in it himself. According to Cardinal Heenan, this is not true since the Cardinal claims that the Novus Ordo Missae was written under the Holy Father's [i.e., Pope Paul 6's] PERSONAL supervision [Cardinal Heenan, Forward to the English translation of the Novus Ordo Missae, November, 1969 A.D.])
(In addition to all of this, did YOU know that while Cardinal Montini [the future Pope Paul 6] was the Archbishop of Milan, he proposed the Novus Ordo Rite with all of its radical changes in his Lenten Pastoral Letter of 1958 A.D.?!! This was two years after his 1956 A.D. meeting of "a delegation of four Anglican priests and a layman [These men were PROTESTANTS who obviously came not to be converted to the ROMAN Catholic Church!] who stayed with him some ten days... the meetings were clandestine in the extreme..." [B & M Pawley, FROM ROME TO CANTERBURY THROUGH FOUR CENTURIES].)
(This also contradicts the position of those who claim that there was NO Protestant influence in any way in that man-made fabrication - the 16th Century updated Protestant Supper-Memorial-Meal, a.k.a. the Novus Ordo Missae!!!)
(Based upon the above, it would seem reasonable to take the position that the future Pope Paul 6 spent two years working on the Novus Ordo Missae WITH these Protestant Anglicans, between his highly SECRET meeting with the 5 Anglicans in 1956 A.D. and his presentation of the Novus Ordo Missae with all of its radical changes in his Lenten Pastoral Letter of 1958 A.D.?!)
(There is the further strong possibility that one or more of the Six Protestants of the Concilium, with whom he posed for photos on Friday, April 10, 1970 A.D., were part of this 1956 A.D. "delegation of four Anglican priests and a layman who stayed with him some ten days... the meetings were clandestine in the extreme.. "!!!)
(Finally, for those who would take the position that we are contradicting Ourself when We relate on the one hand that Cardinal Montini [the future Pope Paul 6] "spent two years working on the Novus Ordo Missae, between his highly SECRET meeting with the 5 Anglicans in 1956 A.D. and his presentation of the Novus Ordo Missae with all of its radical changes in his Lenten Pastoral Letter of 1958 A.D.!" and, on the other hand, that the Concilium made up the Novus Ordo Missae, have forgotten that, as we also mentioned above, Cardinal Heenan "claims that the Novus Ordo Missae was written under the Holy Father's [i.e., Pope Paul 6's] PERSONAL supervision [Cardinal Heenan, Forward to the English translation of the Novus Ordo Missae, November, 1969 A.D.]!")
(How do you reconcile these apparent contradictions? First of all, thank God, we were NOT there and thus can not give any personal observations or account of such highly secret, apparently anti-Catholic, activities?!!! We are, as a result, forced by circumstances, to logically surmise that most probably what happened is that the 5 Anglicans who attended the highly secret meeting with Cardinal Montini in 1956 A.D. read his presentation of the Novus Ordo Missae with all of its radical changes in his Lenten Pastoral Letter of 1958 A.D. and most probably made some suggestions for some changes which would make the Novus Ordo Missae more acceptable to Anglicans. But remember also that the Concilium also had on it other Protestants, including one or more representatives of other Protestant organizations, namely: The World Council of Churches, the Lutheran Church, and the Protestant Community of Taize.)
(It seems obvious that the members of these different Protestant organizations would have needed to have worked out their own differences among themselves so that the 1958 A.D. version of the Novus Ordo Missae would have been used as the starting point, with input from everyone else. However, the basic contents and structure were obviously deemed so essential by Pope Paul 6 that he found it necessary to make certain that the members of the Concilium did not stray too far away from his 1958 A.D. version of the Novus Ordo Missae, which would logically explain why Cardinal Heenan-who, to the best of our knowledge was never contradicted either by the Vatican or personally by Pope Paul 6 - claims that the Novus Ordo Missae was written under the Holy Father's [i.e., Pope Paul 6's] PERSONAL supervision [Cardinal Heenan, Forward to the English translation of the Novus Ordo Missae, November, 1969 A.D..])
comes to its end, after its excellent activity...
(This heretical revolution, which propounded the Magna Charta of Modernism, was successful in that it was dripping and otherwise soaked with so many anti-Catholic things -faith, belief, Mass, Sacraments, etc.!)
In this wish, and with a specially warm love, we impart to each and all of you the Apostolic Blessing."
(From: L'OSSERVATORE ROMANO, Weekly Edition in English, Third Year N. 17 [108], Thursday, APRIL 23, 1970, pages # 1 and 2.)
Therefore, it should be clear from all of this that real Catholics can NOT go to such non-Catholic supper/meals (Protestant "masses"), despite the fact that they may be held in what used to be "Catholic" Church buildings!
It is certainly past time for sincere "Catholics" to start praying for the conversion to the CATHOLIC Faith, from the non-Catholic VATICAN 2 church, of ALL of the members of the heretical and schismatic VATICAN 2 church.
Please note: The terms "Protestant", "heretical" and "schismatic" are used within what has historically been the unchangeable position of the Catholic Church regarding her official theological, dogmatic, liturgical, legal, and other teachings, especially on the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the Seven Sacraments.
Hence the terms "Protestant", "heretical" and "schismatic" are used within the context of objective definitions used historically and traditionally by the Catholic Church in her lawful use of the various objective sciences of theology, liturgy, church history, canon law, philosophy, and others, as proven from the writings of well-respected authors of previous centuries whose precedents we simply follow.
Now, therefore, the members of the heretical and schismatic Vatican 2 church, for whom your prayers are requested for their conversion to the CATHOLIC Church, include not only all of the Religious and Laity of the VATICAN 2 church, but also all of the Clergy of the Vatican 2 church. The reason is that, while professing themselves to be "Catholic", in terms of at least some of their theological and liturgical beliefs, especially regarding the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, they are de facto PROTESTANTS, just as the 16th century "Catholic" Clergy, Religious and Laity were de facto PROTESTANTS in places like England and Germany!
Even today, many of them in these same places are still de facto PROTESTANTS! Among the Vatican 2 church PROTESTANT Clergy, who are hereby included, in virtue of the principle of "lex orandi, lex credendi", as "Protestant", are the Pope, plus the Cardinals, Bishops, Priests and other Clergy of the VATICAN 2 church!
They are all under the censures of automatic excommunication for their direct, continuous violations of some of the Canons of the Council of Trent, especially session 22 on the Mass, and the Quo Primum Tempore of Pope St. Pius V! Plus, they have committed the Mortal Sin of Perjury for their continual daily breaking of The Profession of Faith and The Oath Against Modernism which the Roman Catholic Church requires of its Clergy, most especially, its Priests and Bishops - which includes Cardinals and Popes!
Therefore, IF you say you are a "Catholic" (this applies most especially to Catholic Clergy) you are required thereby to teach, to believe and to practice the Faith of the CATHOLIC Church, including the proper use of the ancient and approved VALID and LAWFUL CATHOLIC liturgical rites for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the Seven Sacraments.
What sense does it make for a "Catholic" Priest to use some kind of voodoo rite for the Mass and the Seven Sacraments?
Catholics have a right to expect that their "Catholic" Priest will use the right rite! That he will in fact use an ancient, approved VALID and LAWFUL CATHOLIC traditional liturgical rite for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the Seven Sacraments!
Consider, for a moment, how, because of the Council of Trent and Pope St. Pius V, Catholics could peacefully expect that their "Catholic" pastors would in fact use that ancient, approved VALID and LAWFUL CATHOLIC traditional liturgical rite for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass which both the Council of Trent and Pope St. Pius V, have guarded and protected with their anathemas!
Yet the Vatican 2 church has abandoned these integral Catholic defenses! This is why the Roman Theologians have included this subject within their STUDY and concluded with it.
VIII. The abandonment of defenses
71. St. Pius V had the Roman Missal drawn up (as the present Apostolic Constitution itself recalls) so that it might be an instrument of unity among Catholics. In conformity with the injunctions of the Council of Trent it was to exclude all danger, in liturgical worship, of errors against the Faith, then threatened by the Protestant Reformation. The gravity of the situation fully justified, and even rendered prophetic, the saintly Pontiff's solemn warning given at the end of the Bull promulgating his Missal: "Should any person venture to do so, let him understand that he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the blessed Apostles Peter and Paul."
72. When the Novus Ordo was presented at the Vatican Press Office, it was asserted with great audacity that the reasons which prompted the Tridentine decrees are no longer valid. Not only do they still apply, but there also exist, as we do not hesitate to affirm, very much more serious ones [i.e., reasons] today. It was precisely in order to ward off the dangers which in every century threaten the purity of the deposit of faith ("depositum custodi, devitans profanas vocum novitates." that the Church has had to erect under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost the defenses of her dogmatic definitions and doctrinal pronouncements. These were immediately reflected in her worship, which became the most complete monument of her faith. To try to bring the Church's worship back at all cost to the ancient practice by refashioning, artificially and with that "unhealthy archeologism" so roundly condemned by Pius XII,what in earlier times had the grace of original spontaneity means--as we see today only too clearly--to dismantle all the theological ramparts erected for the protection of the Rite and to take away all the beauty by which it was enriched over the centuries.
73. And all this at one of the most critical moments--if not the most critical moment--of the Church's history! Today, division and schism are officially acknowledged to exist not only outside of but within the Church. Her unity is not only threatened but already tragically compromised. Errors against the Faith are not merely insinuated but positively imposed by means of liturgical abuses and aberrations which have been equally acknowledged. To abandon a liturgical tradition which for four centuries was both the sign and the pledge of unity of worship(and to replace it with another which cannot but be a sign of division by virtue of the countless liberties implicitly authorized, and which teems with insinuations or manifest errors against the integrity of the Catholic religion) is, we feel in conscience bound to proclaim, an incalculable error. (Roman Theologians, The Critical Study of the New Order of Mass, Thursday, June 5, 1969 A.D., # 71-73).
Therefore, very few Catholics would - and NONE should - expect a "Catholic" Priest to use a voodoo rite, or a hindu ritual, or a shaman ritual, or, while we are on this subject, an anti-Catholic Protestant supper memorial meal in place of the CATHOLIC traditional liturgical rite for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass!
If the members of the shinto religion went to a service where their shinto priest used the Ancient Roman Rite of the Catholic Church in place of their shinto rituals, would there not be a riot and would not the congregation grab such a shinto priest and physically throw him out of their place of worship?
How many "catholic" Priests of the Vatican 2 church have been physically thrown out of what used to be ROMAN Catholic Churches by their congregations for using the newly synthesized/updated Protestant supper memorial-meal instead of the CATHOLIC traditional liturgical rite for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass which is called the Ancient Roman Rite!?
Thomas Cranmer, the first Protestant Archbishop of Canterbury, had a revolt on his hands by some Catholics when he tried to force them to accept his 1549 A.D. and 1552 A.D. versions of the Novus Ordo Missae known as the First and Second Prayer Books of Edward VI!!!
Is it true that some of the Catholics of England of the 16th Century were better educated and/or loved their CATHOLIC Faith much MORE than many of the Catholics of these days who, despite their sincerity, have been victimized by the endless hypnotic mantra: "Obey the Pope"?!!! and "Obey the Bishop"?!!! - even if that "pope" and/or "bishop" belongs to a non-Catholic church, e.g. the Vatican 2 church?!
The sad thing is that it seems that a vast majority of Catholics do NOT know their Catholic Faith!
This seems to be one reason why the VATICAN 2 church has been so successful! The VATICAN 2 church has taken advantage of the ignorance of its own people!
The VATICAN 2 church has victimized its members while infecting them with the heresy of Modernism!
But those people who go to a VATICAN 2 church ARE getting something other than the ancient, approved VALID and LAWFUL CATHOLIC traditional liturgical rite [the Ancient Roman Rite] for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the Seven Sacraments - despite denials to the contrary from the Pope, Cardinals, Bishops, Priests, "experts", theologians, etc. of the Vatican 2 church!
Today, it seems as if there is really no substantial or ontologically essential difference between a person going to say the Protestant Anglican - Episcopalian Church, or a Protestant Lutheran Church or a Protestant Methodist Church, or some other Protestant Church and the PROTESTANT VATICAN 2 church which seems to have become the official teacher, not of CATHOLICISM, but instead, of MODERN PROTESTANTISM (lex orandi, lex credendi in action)!
But in order to be a REAL, ACTUAL member of the Catholic Church, one must properly fulfill their duties of membership. On the contrary, IF a "Catholic" freely chooses NOT to fulfill ALL of his duties of membership in the Catholic Church, that person is no longer a de facto "Catholic"!
IF a person who calls himself a "Catholic" practices some other faith, e.g., a PROTESTANT faith, then, in reality, that person can NOT any longer call himself a "Catholic" and all of the legalisms in the world of heretical Modernism - despite the Magna Charta of Modernism - can't change that truth!
In conclusion, though We are a sinner, We humbly ask all of you to pray that God will give each and every member of the Vatican 2 church - especially its "pope, cardinals, bishops and priests", through your prayers, the Grace of Conversion to the One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic Church, the Mystical Body of Jesus Christ, outside of which there is no salvation!
May all of us do this for the Greater Honor and Glory of God and the Salvation of Souls!