 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This Issue:
PUBLIC LETTER
to
Pope John Paul 2
Over the years, We have written several letters to Pope John-Paul 2. They were probably thrown away before they ever got through to the top of the Vatican bureaucracy. So, it seems doubtful at best whether or not he personally saw them, let alone read them.
Nevertheless, We had an obligation to write to him. Because that was a long time ago, and because things have continued to deteriorate in the Vatican 2 church, especially now with the homosexual and homosexual-pedophile crisis in the Vatican 2 church, and because JP-2 is now advanced in years, it is expedient that We write one last time to him to give him a final warning to REPENT!
However, THIS TIME, We choose to make this PUBLIC LETTER available to the world on the Internet so that everyone may have the opportunity to read it, even JP-2!
Thank you for taking the time from your busy schedule to read this.
God bless you!
Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam!
Feast of the Holy Apostles,
Saints Philip and James the Just
May 1, 2002 A.D.
U.S.A.
PUBLIC LETTER
John-Paul 2
Vatican City,
Rome, Italy
To John-Paul 2:
Because that many errors are at this time disseminated and many things are taught and maintained by divers persons, in opposition to this ancient faith, which is based on the Sacred Gospels, the Traditions of the Apostles, and the doctrine of the holy Fathers of the Catholic Church (Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent, Session 22, Monday, September 17, 1562 A.D., Canons and Decrees on the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass), We are required, more than ever before, to fulfill the duties and responsibilities of Our God-Given Ecclesiastical Offices.
The Catholic traditional PONTIFICALE ROMANUM mentions these Offices in the liturgical Rite for the Consecration of a Bishop, irregardless the Ecclesiastical Rank of Jurisdiction. These Ecclesiastical Episcopal Offices include the Teaching Office which includes the correct teaching of Sacred Scripture. In the Rite itself, the candidate is asked: "Will you teach the people...the things you understand from the divine Scriptures?" (Op. Cit.; emphasis added). In addition to Sacred Scripture, the Teaching Office extends to the Authentic Apostolic Tradition as it has come down to us through the Apostolic Fathers and the Fathers of the Catholic Church. In the Rite itself, the candidate is asked: "Will you receive, keep and teach with reverence the traditions of the Orthodox Fathers...?" (Op. Cit.; emphasis added).
Further, the Episcopal Office includes not just the Teaching Office, but also everything else which pertains to the Pastoral Office. Besides the Teaching Office, the Pastoral Office also includes, but is not limited to, the Office of Ecclesiastical Judge, the Preaching Office and the Office of Discipline.
Thus, when receiving the Crozier, the newly consecrated Bishop hears these words of his Consecrator: "Receive the staff of the Pastoral Office, so that in the correction of vices you may be lovingly severe, giving judgment without wrath, softening the minds of your hearers whilst fostering virtues, not neglecting strictness of discipline through love of tranquillity" (Op. Cit.; emphasis added).
To be faithful to the exercise of Our Ecclesiastical Episcopal Offices of Teacher, Preacher, Judge and Pastor, what are We supposed to do when We witness with Our own eyes and ears, whether in person, or through the media, whether print, radio and/or television media, not to mention the internet, a never-ending attack by the Vatican 2 church (lex orandi, lex credendi), whether through you, personally, as its leader, or indirectly through your bureaucracy, your heretical clergy, and/or your pedophile clergy, upon the Sacred Catholic Traditional liturgical Rites for offering the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the Seven Sacraments, the ontological essence of which was perfectly instituted by the Eternal High Priest, Jesus Christ Himself, the proper interpretation of Sacred Scripture, the Authentic Apostolic Tradition, not to mention the victimization of your own Laity through subtle heresies which action slowly disintegrates the last vestiges deep within them of whatever little remains of their Faith of the Catholic Church?!
YOU should be ashamed of yourself, John-Paul 2! YOU are about to discover that the heresy YOUR Vatican 2 church has been spreading, namely, that "God is NOT in the punishment business" is just that-a lying heresy which deceives ordinary people!
Why should We not "cry aloud, spare not, lift up your voice like a trumpet" (Isaias 58:1)?!
We consider, for example, your heretical teachings on Heaven and Hell.
First, you asserted: "In the context of Revelation, we know that the 'heaven' or 'happiness' in which we will find ourselves is neither an abstraction nor a physical place in the clouds, but a living, personal relationship with the Holy Trinity. It is our meeting with the Father which takes place in the risen Christ through the communion of the Holy Spirit" (JP-2, General Audience of Wednesday, 21 July, 1999; published in L'Osservatore Romano - 28 July 1999).
Thus, JP-2's "heaven" is NOT "a physical place"; rather, it is a state - "a...relationship". In reality, it is the Teilhardian black hole of the omega point! Shades of the pantheism of Spinoza and a sentimentalized atheism, ala Cartesian Teilhardism! Thus, your state of "nowhere"!
Then you asserted: "Hell is not a punishment imposed externally by God, but the condition resulting from attitudes and actions which people adopt in this life. It is the ultimate consequence of sin itself. Sacred Scripture uses many images to describe the pain, frustration and emptiness of life without God. More than a physical place, hell is the state of those who freely and definitively separate themselves from God, the source of all life and joy" JP-2, General Audience of Wednesday, 28 July, 1999; Taken from Vatican, the Holy See Web Site on the Internet at: http://www.vatican.va/; emphasis added). This time, using a more deliberate ambiguity, while actually calling Hell "more than a physical place", you unequivocally, for a change, stated that "hell is the state of..." Thus, in reality, another "state" of "nowhere"!
So, to you, JP-2, Heaven and Hell are "states", like "Never-Never Land", not really "places", because "a...relationship" and a "condition" are so far superior to being mere "places"! Ah, yes, to you, JP-2, Heaven and Hell indeed are much more than anachronistic "places", because for YOU, JP-2, Heaven, Purgatory and Hell are the nothingness of nowhere in your will-o'-the-wisp elitist eclecticism which is spewed forth from the mouths of cloned Roman-collared gargoyles, the horns atop the stoned heads of which remind one of surrogated Devils of Hell who subrogate the Laws of Almighty God with the wormwood of spiritually invalid and illegal substitutions, including the updated 16th Century Protestant supper-memorial-meal, a.k.a. the "new mass", plus the proliferation of doctrinal, theological, philosophical and liturgical error, heresy, destruction, and decay which lead to death!
We have heard a rumor that you are a "philosopher". If so, tell Us, John-Paul 2, using ONLY the approved and traditional methods of Scholastic Philosophy, what is the ontological essence of the nothingness of nowhere "state"? Dare We even inquire as to its metaphysical essence?
We ask you, when did your apotheosis take place in which you received this NEW "revelation" as you traveled throughout the black hole of heresy, the fruition of the nothingness of nowhere, which proceedeth from the heat-oppressed brain of the Roman-collared gargoyle while proffering the raiments of "whited sepulchres, which outwardly appear to men beautiful, but within are full of dead men's bones, and of all filthiness, so you also outwardly indeed appear to men just; but inwardly you are full of hypocrisy and iniquity" (Matthew 23:27-28)?
Rather, We concur with Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914] and remind you that the major dogma of Modernism is change, to wit, evolution. Yet We consider that the evolution of Modernism is in truth a de facto DEVOLUTION (or as some, in parody, would call it, a "devil - ution") in which error and heresy have been canonized on the table of change thereby sacrificing the God-instituted Holy Altar of the Infinite Victim of Divine Propitiation for the Seder-enhanced man-made supper-memorial-meal of rebellion supported by its Satanic staff of Mortal Sin which permeates its bread of contradiction and its chalice of malediction which is filled to overflowing with the wormwood of hyperbolic Satanic worship hypocritically disguised with the trappings of the fake fur of a highly-selective, out-of-context, antiquity wrapped up in the anti-Scholastic multi-colored coat of Cartesianism encrusted with the phony gems of true Teilhardism which sends its adherents into the black hole of the ubiquitous "omega point" of a religious, spiritual, philosophical, theological, scriptural, historical, liturgical and juridical suicidal insanity, irreligion, anti-Catholicism and anti-Clericalism replete with the high-sounding aphorisms of a false Œcumenism which sound good but are neither good nor sound and which in fact hit the Holy Face of Almighty God with the left fist of Marxian dialectical materialism and the right fist of Montanist dialectical Modernism.
But then, of course, as a philosopher of Hegelian materialistic dialectics, it should be self-evident to almost everyone that you must be familiar with the philosophy of Marxist Communism, are you not? It has come to Our attention that at the Conclave which selected John-Paul 1, Albano Luciani [Saturday, August 26, 1978 - Thursday, September 28, 1978], it has been claimed that you, then Cardinal "Wojtyla always takes along some reading matter wherever he goes, and during those long periods of voting in the conclave he was calmly perusing a [philosophy] book of political theory by Karl Marx. When a fellow cardinal asked if he didn't feel it sacrilegious to read such an author in that sacred place, he [YOU, reportedly] answered with a good natured smile, 'My conscience is clear'" (Wilton Wynn, KEEPERS OF THE KEYS, p. 39)!
Of course when you indicated that Heaven and Hell are "states", you perhaps intended to be consistent with what your Vatican 2 church "catechism" (a.k.a. "Catechism of the Catholic Church") covers on this same subject of the nothingness of nowhere, a.k.a. Never-Never Land?!
In witness whereof, We present the following analysis which comes from a source with which you should be familiar, after all, a copy of it was left at the Vatican by its author for you to read!
We quote from a document which was signed by an Official of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith which now appears with this book under discussion, along with a photograph in proof of the signing of said document by said official:
"Rome, 13 May 1993. I the undersigned, Mgr Damiano Marzotto Caorta, Official of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, have received from the Abbé de Nantes two copies of the 'Book of Accusation for Heresy', one for the Holy Father and one for Cardinal Ratzinger.
[signed:] Mgr Damiano Marzotto Caorta.
This book of accusation is a canonical appeal for the opening of a heresy trial, as soon as possible, under pain of dereliction of duty." (Abbé Georges De Nantes, TO HIS HOLINESS POPE JOHN PAUL II. BOOK OF ACCUSATION FOR HERESY Against the Author of the Supposed CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.)"
We have found what Abbé Georges De Nantes has written on this subject of Heaven and Hell to be very interesting and certainly credible. Therefore, We quote from his analysis of these heresies concerning the Never-Never Land's nothingness of nowhere which YOU call "Heaven and Hell"!
Please Note: It is Our understanding that the text of what follows has NOT been copyrighted. Although what does follow is a direct quote, but without the quotation marks.
FIFTH HERESY
ERROR OF A REMOTE HEREAFTER OUTSIDE SPACE AND TIME, OF A DISINCARNATE CHRIST, AND OF AN EVANESCENT KINGDOM
ARGUMENT
We are very shaken in our faith and in our confidence in the Church by the double shock of this Catechism's [the "catechism" of the Vatican 2 church] modernity which goes beyond our understanding of dogmatic Truth and which breaks with the living treasure of our Catholic Tradition. The first shock is experienced as a rent or schism, the other shock as a gnostic speculation or heresy.
Whether it be a question of God's supernatural relations with us, involving predestination and grace, or of our relations with the Word Incarnate, Jesus Christ, who calls us to follow Him by taking up our cross so that we might be saved, or of the drama of His sorrowful Passion suffered at the hands of wicked men for the redemption of the world, we cannot accept that the CCC should abuse Sacred Scripture with such dishonest and lying audacity nor that it should disdain and contradict the entire living, eloquent and edifying Tradition of the centuries in order to wrench us insolently from our own popular and universal religion. For such is the schism in which this Catechism is perversely and delightedly steeped. To us it seems like sacrilege.
If only it were done to make divine Revelation speak to us and move us still more, to make it more accessible and to raise us up to the splendours of God! But no, it is completely the other way round. At every article of the Creed, our immemorial convictions, our common Catholic mentality are broken, annihilated and replaced by abstract theories that are totally inconsistent with our faith, or rather contrary and alien to its divine Truth and clarity. It is a multiform heresy that pursues its course and becomes more complex from one chapter to the next, leaving us shattered and miserable. It is an intellectual gnosis, an optimistic vision, but one that is demobilising and without love, where God speaks less and less and man withdraws into his all pervading me. It is a series of heresies leading to apostasy.
So now that Jesus has completed His course and saved all men, for now and for ever, we wonder what paradox we shall be told about His future and ours. It will be a decisive test. If our traditions and sentiments are again upset, it will lead to despair or else a universal slide into this fanciful religion where man makes himself the centre of the world and gives glory to himself with no further regard for God, His Heaven, nor hell itself...
And that is precisely what does happen!
The Resurrection, an historical and transcendent event
644. Even when faced with the reality of the risen Jesus, the disciples still doubt, so impossible did the thing seem to them: they think they are seeing a ghost...therefore the hypothesis that the Resurrection might have been the "product" of the Apostles' faith (or credulity) will not hold up. On the contrary, their faith in the Resurrection was born - under the action of divine grace - from their direct experience of the reality of the risen Jesus.
That sounds decisive and gladdens my old ancestral faith, saying to me: If He resumed His Body with such Truth, with such realism, it cannot be to dissolve it or lose it, neither tomorrow nor ever. Thus, the future before us is certain, that of a Kingdom of God that is complete and ravishing. Alas! The CCC [Vatican 2 church "catechism", i.e. Catechism of the Catholic Church] quickly extinguishes this flame:
645. The risen Jesus establishes direct relations with His disciples through touch and the sharing of meals. He thereby invites them to recognise that He is not a ghost and above all to realise that the risen body whereby He presents Himself to them is the same body that had been tortured and crucified, since He still bears the scars of His passion. This real and authentic body possesses at the same time, however, the new properties of a glorious body. It is no longer situated in space and time, but is able to be present where and when He wishes, for His humanity can no longer be retained on earth and now belongs to the divine realms of the Father only. For this reason too, the risen Jesus enjoys the sovereign freedom of appearing as He wishes: in the guise of a gardener or "in other forms" (Mk 16.12) different from those which were familiar to the disciples, precisely in order to arouse their faith.
Here I wince at the expression "It is no longer situated in space and time". It may sound very learned and very original, but to be exact: 1). It contemptuously dismisses the traditional language, understanding and representations of the Mystery, which have kept alive the Church's hope for two thousand years. That in itself is schismatic. 2). It plays on two levels at once, that of the ancient language and that of its esoteric interpretations, without any concern about their incoherence and permanent contradiction. This game of equivocation hides the obvious inability of the new gnosis to explain what the state of the Risen One is today, "outside time and space". Anything so inconceivable and defiant of Catholic dogma is necessarily heretical, and that is sufficient reason for rejecting it.
The continuation confirms our criticism:
646. Christ's Resurrection was not a return to earthly life, as was the case with the resurrections He had performed before Passover: the daughter of Jairus, the young man of Naim, Lazarus. These actions were miraculous events, but the persons miraculously restored to life through the power of Jesus returned to an "ordinary" earthly life. At a certain moment, they will die again. The Resurrection of Christ is essentially different. In His risen body, He passes from the state of death to another life beyond time and space. The body of Jesus, in the Resurrection, is filled with the power of the Holy Spirit; He shares the divine life in His glorious state, so that Saint Paul can say of Christ that He is "the heavenly man" (cf. 1 Cor 15.35-50).
The whole of this alignment of propositions, of no logical consequence or realistic coherence, is a purely intellectual digression from the fact of the Resurrection, gradually whittling it down so that nothing is left of Christ's reality except the spiritual, without location or substance, without duration and synchrony, and without bodily or intellectual relations with other beings like Himself.
In fact, it ends up in this piece of verbosity, quite lacking in any historical or physical foundation:
655. _ As they await the future resurrection, the risen Christ lives in the hearts of His faithful. In Him, Christians "taste the powers of the world to come" and their lives are swept up by Christ into the heart of the divine Life.
All of which no longer means anything...
But now for the Ascension - an Ascension to nowhere
659. "So then the Lord Jesus, after He had spoken to them, was taken up into heaven, and sat down at the right hand of God" (Mk 16.19). Christ's Body was glorified at the instant of His Resurrection, as is proved by the new and supernatural properties His Body subsequently and permanently enjoys. But during the forty days when He eats and drinks familiarly with His disciples and instructs them about the Kingdom, His glory still remains veiled under the appearance of an ordinary humanity. Jesus' final apparition ends with the irreversible entry of His humanity into the divine glory symbolised by the cloud and by the heavens, where He henceforth sits at God's right hand. It is only in an exceptional and unique fashion that He will show Himself to Paul "as to one untimely born" (1 Cor 15.8) in one last apparition that will constitute him an apostle.
What is this "irreversible entry" of His humanity "into the divine glory"? An "irreversibility" (sic!) immediately contradicted by the return of Jesus - which we are assured was exceptional - during the apparition to Saint Paul on the road to Damascus! And more solemnly contradicted by these words of the angels in the very account of the Ascension, which belies this supposed irreversibility: "This same Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven, will come back in the same way as you saw Him go into heaven." (Acts 1.11)
Is it possible to treat the divine Word and the apostolic testimony with such contempt? - aligning this new gnosis with the faith and mixing everything up in hopeless confusion as in the following:
665. Christ's Ascension marks the definitive entrance of Jesus' humanity (!) into God's heavenly domain (sic!), whence He will come again, but which, in the meantime, conceals Him from human eyes.
Here truly, schism and heresy energetically join forces, obliging us to make a decisive choice between this distressing, worthless, apostate gnosis and our robust Catholic hope in the resurrection of the body and in the life everlasting. Amen!
The resurrection of the body no longer makes sense
This same perfidious language, this duplicity whereby pure gnostic imaginings are wedded to the substantial reality of our Catholic dogmas, may be an amusement for sceptical and destructive dilettantes. But nothing can come of it except the emptying of the Church and the dying of thirst of souls incapable of resisting alone the searing wind of these cursed inventions.
But here initially - to ensnare the faithful? - are some solid affirmations concerning the dogma of the resurrection of the body:
989. We firmly believe, and thus we hope, that, just as Christ is truly risen from the dead and lives for ever, so likewise after their death, the just will live for ever with the risen Christ and He will raise them up on the last day_
990. The term "flesh " designates man in his condition of weakness and mortality. The "resurrection of the flesh" means not only that the immortal soul will live on after death, but that even our "mortal bodies" (Rom 8.11) will come to life again.
The CCC then goes on to multiply quotations from Sacred Scripture, from the Fathers, from the Councils, and from Benedict XII on Heaven, who is the most explicit (1023), all of which exclude the foolish and insubstantial idea of a bodily (and spiritual!) existence outside space and time. It is a pleasure to read and it reassures us:
997. What does it mean to rise again? In death, the separation of the soul from the body, the human body decays, whilst the soul goes to meet God, all the while awaiting its reunion with its glorified body. God in His Omnipotence will definitively restore incorruptible life to our bodies, uniting them to our souls by virtue of Jesus' Resurrection.
1015. "The flesh is the pivot of salvation" (Tertullian). We believe in God who is the Creator of the flesh; we believe in the Word made flesh for the redemption of the flesh; we believe in the resurrection of the flesh, the fulfilment of both the creation and the redemption of the flesh.
But if we allow ourselves to be taken in, our disappointment will be only too bitter. Why speak of the resurrection of the body, if it is not to go to a place just as material and to live out, along with the saints or demons, a destiny that is fully human? But instead, we are now presented with the void of a gnosis of "nowhere", where heresy and schism are exacerbated by a perfidious negation of the faith.
Heaven, Purgatory, Limbo, and Hell: the states of souls who are nowhere!
Seeing that Christ is risen and the Virgin Mary raised up into the Heavens, according to the CCC:
966. "_ having accomplished the course of Her earthly life, the Immaculate Virgin was assumed body and soul into the glory of Heaven, and exalted by the Lord as Queen of the universe, to conform more fully to her Son, the Lord of lords, victorious over sin and death"
Their mutual presence necessarily constitutes a space, inaugurates a place, called Heaven or Paradise, the happy abode of the elect. And consequently, other places will be allocated for the eternal destination of other humans, body and soul, for their happiness, their temporary purification, or their eternal damnation. Whenever the CCC speaks of these things it is in the traditional language, but it never misses an opportunity to dissolve their reality into gnostic fantasies of no substance or truth:
Heaven? It is a state, not a place.
1024. This perfect life with the Most Holy Trinity, this communion of life and love with the Trinity, the Virgin Mary, the angels and all the blessed, is called "Heaven". Heaven is the ultimate end and fulfilment of man's deepest aspirations, the state of supreme and definitive happiness.
1025. To live in heaven is "to be with Christ". The elect live "in Him", but there they retain, or rather find, their true identity, their proper name. "For life is to be with Christ; where Christ is, there is life, there is the kingdom."
Purgatory? It is a purification that takes place nowhere.
1031. The Church gives the name Purgatory to this final purification of the elect, which is quite distinct from the punishment of the damned. The Church formulated her doctrine of faith on Purgatory chiefly at the Councils of Florence and Trent. The tradition of the Church, referring to certain texts of Scripture, speaks of a purifying fire
Hell? It is unhappiness without fire or locality!
1033. _ Our Lord warns us that we shall be separated from Him if we neglect to meet the grave needs of the poor and the little ones who are His brethren. To die in mortal sin without having repented and without having welcomed God's merciful love is to remain separated from Him for ever through our own free choice. And it is this state of definitive self-exclusion from communion with God and the blessed that is designated by the word "hell".
Here at last the Antichrist accidentally reveals himself
I know of nothing more insulting to Jesus Christ, to His Church, to His preachers, and to generations of pious believers and saints, than this mockery of Christ's words:
1027. This mystery of blessed communion with God and with all those who are in Christ surpasses all understanding and representation. Scripture speaks to us about it in images: life, light, peace, wedding feast, wine of the kingdom, the Father's house, the heavenly Jerusalem, paradise: "no eye has seen, nor ear heard, nor the heart of man conceived, what God has prepared for those who love Him." (1 Cor 2.9)
So much for the representations and conceptions that Christians unanimously, everywhere, and always, have formed, preached and believed on the word of Christ. They are swept aside as childish dreams and crude imagination, even though they are drawn from Sacred Scripture and were always respected as figures chosen by Jesus - and by Saint John! - to describe Heaven, where Jesus and Mary are enthroned in the fullness of happiness and glory. The inspired language of Scripture suggests, better than any learned discourse or quintessential abstraction, that the promised Paradise is a magnificent place of the same kind - though better! - as the earth, the sky, the seas and the forests, and all the splendours of body and mind. It expresses a beauty, a tenderness, a delight in love and knowledge far greater than those of the mystery of the child in its mother's womb, of the bride in the arms of her spouse, of the family gathered around the table at the wedding feast, of the liturgy for the consecration of virgins, of the ordaining of a bishop, of the ecstasy of Magdalene at the feet of the teaching Jesus, or that of the disciple whom Jesus loved listening to His divine heartbeat on the evening of the Last Supper.
All of this is treated with contempt and its truth is contested. But is it rejected in favour of anything better? Yet it is JESUS who spoke thus, and it is what Saint John recounted to us in his visions! These admirable, holy, simple and touching allegories are certainly true. Has anything better ever been found to tell the crowds, in order to give them the love of this eternal life? To talk about "the intuitive vision of the divine essence, without the mediation of any creature" (1024) is rather too laborious and too late in the day. If the faithful are deprived of a language that speaks to them and of all the allegories that form the material of Christian preaching, they will no longer see, savour or even understand the meaning of this word "Beatitude". Why should they sacrifice the substance for the shadow, the reality of happiness for its fiction, and ultimately earthly joys for the boredom of Heaven!
For I know from pastoral experience - something in which our authors seem to be entirely lacking - that those who listen to their dreary talk are sadly afraid of feeling bored in Heaven. And perhaps just as much in hell - this new hell that is neither a place, nor a fire, nor any kind of crudely imagined torture, but merely the privation, pure and simple, of the direct vision of the divine essence... which means nothing to them. Boredom, I tell you, exudes from every page of this Catechism for intellectuals! It is a Catechism without imagination or poetry, and therefore closed to the divine mysteries.
Which of course is its aim.
AFTER THE CYCLE OF THE FATHER AND THE CYCLE OF JESUS ARE CLOSED, THE WAY IS FREE AT LAST FOR THE REIGN OF "THE SPIRIT"
ACCUSATION JUSTIFIED
Two religions have been fighting it out in the Church since the Council. And finally, in this Catechism, it is the new religion that must destroy the old. We are in an essential phase here. Jesus is risen, yes! but at the price of an obliteration into the invisible, of a loss of bodily being and of presence to the world. Such is the wish of our gnostics. He has gone "beyond space and time" (645-646), in a way that is "irreversible" (659-660). One certitude: He will not return until all is accomplished.
What is this mystery? Impossible to count on the least honesty from "the Catholic Church" as invoked by the catechism's author. Among a thousand lies, here is one proof:
Christ descended into hell
True or false? After a long quotation from an ancient homily, recounting this descent in realistic and touching terms, and nurturing the faith, hope and joy of Christians (635 b), the CCC throws out the following conclusions:
636. By the expression "Jesus descended into hell", the Apostles' Creed confesses that Jesus really died and that, by His death for us, He conquered death and the devil "who holds the power of death" (Heb 2.14).
That is the thinking - I dare not say the faith - of the Pope and of the Cardinal, "confessing" something other than what their lips pronounce! But, after the lie, here is the opposite:
637. The dead Christ, in His soul united to His divine person, descended to the abode of the dead. To the just who had preceded Him He opened the gates of Heaven.
That is a clear and precise expression of the faith of all places and all times. In saying this, the CCC rejects as schismatic and heretical what it said before. Conclusion: it lies when it speaks the Catholic truth (637) in order to distract us from its gnosis, which is the truth behind its lie (636).
With that proof established, here is my actual accusation: All that concerns the mystery of Jesus, Son of God made man, starting with the event of His Resurrection - namely articles 6 and 7 of the Creed: He ascended into Heaven and is seated at the right hand of God the Father Almighty (659-667), From whence He shall come to judge the living and the dead (668-682) - and continuing with articles 11 and 12: I believe in the resurrection of the body and the life everlasting - everything concerning the Life beyond death and beyond this earth is of absolutely no interest or value to X, the author of the CCC.
Writers of every tendency are allowed to develop their ideas in the CCC. Those of a better heart have applied themselves to stating Catholic Truth. But correctors have intervened with a few words to relegate it all to the realm of vain images and doubtful tradition. Their principal aim is that Jesus should disappear from our horizon for the complete duration of our human history in order that the reign of the Spirit may arrive and realise, without further let or hindrance, what the humanist gnosis governing the mind and works of today's Church has decided to see arrive.
It is agreed that God the Father loves men and will see that their great projects in this world succeed. It is also certain that Jesus became the Saviour of all and that their absolute future is guaranteed. It only remains for man to work with the power of "the Spirit" in the construction of the Man in each and every one of us. That is what absorbs the attention of the Catechism, no other futile concern.
ANATHEMAS
I. If anyone says that the risen Jesus Christ has gone beyond space and time, and that His ascent into Heaven is thenceforth irreversible, let him be anathema.
II. If anyone says that Heaven, Purgatory and Hell are not places but states, nay moral situations or pure feelings of joy or sorrow, let him be anathema.
III. If anyone says that no one can be the object of a damnation sentence to eternal hell, but that the rebel finds himself punished by his own self-excluding decision, whose freedom God respects, let him be anathema." (ABBÉ GEORGES DE NANTES, TO HIS HOLINESS POPE JOHN PAUL II. BOOK OF ACCUSATION FOR HERESY against the Author of the supposed CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.)
Thus, the direct quotation from the book by Abbé Georges De Nantes.
By the way, JP-2, YOU remember WW II don't you? Supposedly, according to two sources, that was when you married a Catholic choir girl in Poland during the Nazi occupation of Poland?!
John-Paul 2 - A Self-Admitted Devil-Worshiper!
It has also come to Our attention that you, John-Paul 2, prayed with African Animists [devil-worshipers]. Who ever heard of a Pius XII or a Saint Pius X praying with devil worshipers?! You claim to actually recall this devil-prayer-service which happened exactly one week before the Feast of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary of Thursday, August 15, 1985 A.D.! One week before this Holy Feast Day, it was Thursday, August 8, 1985 A.D. You yourself recalled that August 8, 1985 devil-prayer-service" "The prayer meeting in the [Satanic] sanctuary at Lake Togo was particularly striking. There I prayed for the first time with animists [devil-worshipers!]" (JP-2, PETER, LOVEST THOU ME?, page 154).
It has been claimed that while at Togo, you also paid homage to the sacred snakes! Snakes alive, you stood with a voodoo chief before a snake hut in the center of the town and threw some cucumber peelings onto the ground in front of the entrance to the snake hut! Then, a few moments later, the report goes that a serpent slithered forth from it. The voodoo chief then turned to you and excitedly explained to you that the appearance of the snake was a sign that the snake god himself, had favored your offering! (John Weiskittel, SACERDOTIUM, Issue # 8, p. 63).
We are left to wonder if you invited the devil worshipers to concelebrate the updated 16th Century Protestant supper-memorial-meal with you and your cardinals, bishops and priests?! Of course, it would not be sacrilegious because this abomination of desolation is not holy, it is unholy!
"What, then, is that sluggishness of mind; yea, what blind and stupid madness of fools, to be unwilling to come out of darkness into light, and to be unwilling, when bound in the toils of eternal death, to receive the hope of immortality, and not to fear God when He threatens and says, "He that sacrificeth to gods, shall be put to death, save only to the Lord" (Exodus 22:20). And again: "And their land is filled with horses: and their chariots are innumerable. Their land also is full of idols: they have adored the work of their own hands, which their own fingers have made. And man hath bowed himself down, and man hath been debased: therefore forgive them not" (Isaias 2:8-9). Why do you humble and bend yourself to false gods? Why do you bow your body captive before foolish images and creations of earth? God made you upright; and while other animals are downlooking, and are depressed in posture bending towards the earth, yours is a lofty attitude; and your countenance is raised upwards to heaven, and to God. Look thither, lift your eyes thitherward, seek God in the highest, that you may be free from things below; lift your heart to a dependence on high and heavenly things. Why do you prostrate yourself into the ruin of death with the serpent whom you worship? Why do you fall into the destruction of the devil, by his means and in his company ? Keep the lofty estate in which you were born. Continue such as you were made by God. To the posture of your countenance and of your body, conform your soul. That you may be able to know God, first know yourself. Forsake the idols which human error has invented. Be turned to God, whom if you implore He will aid you. "Believe in Christ Jesus" (Galatians 2:16), Whom the Father has sent to quicken and restore us. Cease to hurt the servants of God and of Christ with your persecutions, since when they are injured the divine vengeance defends them" (Saint Cyprian, Father of the Catholic Church, The Treatises of Cyprian, TREATISE V, An Address in Reply to Demetrianus the Proconsul of Africa, # 16).
We remind you: "But the things which the heathens sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God. And I would not that you should be made partakers with devils. You cannot drink the chalice of the Lord, and the chalice of devils: you cannot be partakers of the table of the Lord, and of the table of devils. Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy ? Are we stronger than He?" (1 Corinthians 10:20-22).
John-Paul 2 -Homosexuals in the Heart of the Church!
In recent months, the secular news media in the United States has been kept busy trying to keep up with all of the sexual scandals in the Vatican 2 church! The problem seems to be primarily, although certainly not exclusively, of your homosexual/pedophile padres who have been preying on boys and young men!?
But, this should not really be a surprise to anyone! After all, Father Malachi Martin, S.J. in his book, "Windswept House" reported on this, as well as Satanism among the clergy and even in the Vatican itself!
But, even years before that book, We tried to warn everyone about the homosexual plague in the Vatican 2 church, yet no one wanted to listen or believe Us! On a television program on Friday, June 12, 1992 A.D., We publicly stated: "But how can one expect moral leadership when it would appear that at least some of the leaders themselves are morally bankrupt as evidenced by, for example, the Vatican 2 church which, according to an article written in a national conservative Vatican 2 church publication, a priest who visited the seminary at which he had studied for the priesthood many years before was shocked to discover that the official newspeak policy was to accept only homosexuals as applicants for the seminary program from which future priests and bishops would come. We were quite surprised upon reading this. When we mentioned this article to another person, they indicated that they had heard that this was considered 'common practice' in many of the seminaries of the Vatican 2 church in the United States and elsewhere."
In other words, it is a contradiction to expect a homosexual priest of the Vatican 2 church to condemn the teaching of homosexuality in the schools! But it's not just the priests of the Vatican 2 church. Even the bishops of the Vatican 2 church at their annual meeting in Washington, D.C., in 1990 A.D., issued a statement, as We understand it, to the effect that homosexuality is ok. One is forced to wonder how many of the Vatican 2 bishops who voted in favor of that document were themselves homosexuals and/or homosexual pedophiles?
WHY did the secular news media not follow up on this? That happened in 1990 A.D.!? Why did the secular news media ignore what We said in 1992 A.D.? That was over ten years ago now! Suddenly the secular news media just happens to "discover" that there is a problem in the Vatican 2 church with sexual abuse by its homosexual/pedophile clergy, including some of its bishops and priests! Talk about being asleep at the switch!!!
However, in all fairness, there was a report in one secular newspaper back in 1987 A.D. in which We understand that YOU, JP-2, were quoted as claiming how homosexuals are in the heart of the Church! Homosexuals "are not outcasts, homosexuals [are] like all people who suffer are in the heart of the Church" (JP-2, alleged quote reported by the HOUSTON CHRONICLE, Friday, September 11, 1987 A.D.).
Lest you should want to take the position, JP-2, that homosexuality is not sinful, We would remind you of Divine Revelation which says: "Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind: because it is an abomination" (Leviticus 18:22). Again, "If any one lie with a man as with a woman, both have committed an abomination: let them be put to death. Their blood be upon them" (Leviticus 20:13).
Saint Paul attributes the homosexual desires of some to a refusal to acknowledge and worship God: "For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature. And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error. And as they liked not to have God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do those things which are not convenient" (Romans 1:26-28).
A few verses later, the Apostle of the Gentiles writes: "Who, having known the justice of God, did not understand that they who do such things, are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them" (Romans 1:32).
In other words, JP-2, people like you as well as everyone else who condones or permits homosexual behavior shall receive the SAME punishment as the homosexuals themselves! Based upon the news accounts, YOU, JP-2 have condoned and permitted homosexual and homosexual/pedophile behavior and, as such, YOU "are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them" (Romans 1:32)!
PUBLIC ADMONITION AND WARNING TO JP-2
JOHN-PAUL 2, IMMEDIATELY FIRE ALL HOMOSEXUAL CLERGY IN THE VATICAN 2 CHURCH, BE THEY CARDINALS, BISHOPS (of whatever rank of ecclesiastical jurisdiction), AND ALL HOMOSEXUAL SECULAR AND RELIGIOUS PRIESTS because they "are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them" (Romans 1:32)!
If you do not do this, then the Vatican 2 church will leave itself open to being called such things as "the queer church" or "the queer clergy church" or "the homosexual church", or "the church of homosexual pedophile clergy", etc., etc., because "their crimes become their religion" (Saint Cyprian of Carthage [Thascius Caecilius Cyprianus] [b. Carthage 190 A.D. - d. Carthage 258 A.D.] Archbishop of Carthage, Letters 1:8).
WHERE do large numbers of the clergy who are homosexuals practice "their religion"?!
IN the Vatican 2 church, the Vatican 2 church of which you are the "pope"! The Vatican 2 church whose preying padres, in the practice of "their religion", bring spiritual death to all those with whom they come into contact, as witnessed by the growing numbers of victims of the homosexual and homosexual/pedophile clergy in the Vatican 2 church!
Michael S. Rose in his book, GOODBYE, GOOD MEN, How Liberals Brought Corruption into the Catholic Church, writes about how primarily only homosexual students are admitted into the Vatican 2 church seminary system! (N.B. Said author does not use the term "Vatican 2 church".)
IF YOU do not clean out the vomit of homosexuals in the Vatican 2 church, GOD WILL! As a matter of fact, using the homosexual pedophile scandal, GOD has already begun to clean house in the Vatican 2 church, and GOD hasn't even gotten a good start yet-just wait John-Paul 2, before God is done there will no longer be a Vatican 2 church nor any "popes" or clergy of said church which has become the stalking-ground for homosexual "priests", "bishops" and "cardinals" on the prowl for victims!!!
Additional Condemnations of Homosexuality
God the Holy Ghost, through the pen of Saint Paul, again warns everyone how homosexual behavior is one of the sins which will deprive one of Heaven: "Know you not that the unjust shall not possess the kingdom of God? Do not err: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor the effeminate [male prostitutes], nor liers with mankind [homosexual], nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor railers, nor extortioners, shall possess the kingdom of God" (1 Corinthians 6:9-10)
"All other frenzies of the lusts which exceed the laws of nature, and are impious toward both [human] bodies and the sexes, we banish, not only from the threshold but also from all shelter of the Church, for they are not sins so much as monstrosities" (Tertullian [b. 160 A.D. - d. ? A..D], MODESTY, 4).
WHERE does Tertullian say homosexuals are in "the heart of the church"? Rather, they are banished "from all shelter of the Church"!
"Turn your looks to the abominations, not less to be deplored, of another kind of spectacle...Men are emasculated, and all the pride and vigor of their sex is effeminated in the disgrace of their enervated body; and he is more pleasing there who has most completely broken down the man into the woman. He grows into praise by virtue of his crime; and the more he is degraded, the more skillful he is considered to be. Such a one is looked upon, oh shame!, and looked upon with pleasure...Nor is there wanting authority for the enticing abomination...that Jupiter of theirs [is] not more supreme in dominion than in vice, inflamed with earthly love in the midst of his own thunders...now breaking forth by the help of birds to violate the purity of boys. And now put the question: Can he who looks upon such things be healthy-minded or modest? Men imitate the gods whom they adore, and to such miserable beings their crimes become their religion" (Saint Cyprian of Carthage [Thascius Caecilius Cyprianus] [b. Carthage 190 A.D. - d. Carthage 258 A.D.] Archbishop of Carthage, LETTERS 1:8).
Notice, John-Paul 2, how this holy martyr for the Catholic Faith teaches that for homosexuals, "their crimes become their religion"!
"Oh, if placed on that lofty watchtower, you could gaze into the secret places... if you could open the closed doors of sleeping chambers and recall their dark recesses to the perception of sight...you would behold things done by immodest persons which no chaste eye could look upon; you would see what even to see is a crime; you would see what people embruted with the madness of vice deny that they have done, and yet hasten to do...men with frenzied lusts rushing upon men, doing things which afford no gratification even to those who do them" (Saint Cyprian of Carthage [Thascius Caecilius Cyprianus] [b. Carthage 190 A.D. - d. Carthage 258 A.D.] Archbishop of Carthage, LETTERS 1:9).
"If you [O, monk] are young in either body or mind, shun the companionship of other young men and avoid them as you would a flame. For through them the enemy has kindled the desires of many and then handed them over to eternal fire, hurling them into the vile pit of the five cities under the pretense of spiritual love...At meals take a seat far from other young men. In lying down to sleep let not their clothes be near yours, but rather have an old man between you. When a young man converses with you, or sings psalms facing you, answer him with eyes cast down, lest perhaps by gazing at his face you receive a seed of desire sown by the enemy and reap sheaves of corruption and ruin. Whether in the house or in a place where there is no one to see your actions, be not found in his company under the pretense either of studying the divine oracles or of any other business whatsoever, however necessary" (Saint Basil the Great [b. Caesarea, Cappadocia 329 A.D. - d. Caesarea, Cappadocia 379 A.D.], Doctor of the Catholic Church, Bishop of Caesarea, THE RENUNCIATION OF THE WORLD).
But what about the seminary system and monasteries of men in the Vatican 2 church? They are overflowing with homosexuals! John-Paul 2, here comes Michael S. Rose and his book, GOODBYE, GOOD MEN, How Liberals Brought Corruption into the Catholic Church. Of this well-researched book, one reviewer has written: "Absolutely astonishing...This bombshell book reveals a seminary underworld in which homosexual promiscuity is rampant...and seminarians who support the Church's teaching are persecuted" (Rod Dreher, NATIONAL REVIEW taken from the front dust cover of said book).
Another reviewer writes: "Few books in the past thirty years have shed more light on the continuing crisis in the Catholic Church. In particular, anyone who wishes to understand the pedophilia scandals, and how they could have occurred, must read this book" (James Hitchcock, Professor of History, St. Louis University; taken from the back dust cover of said book).
"Those shameful acts against nature, such as were committed in Sodom, ought everywhere and always to be detested and punished. If all nations were to do such things, they would be held guilty of the same crime by the law of God, which has not made men so that they should use one another in this way" (Saint Augustine [b. Tagaste, Africa 354 A.D. - d. Hippo Regia, Africa 430 A.D.], Father and Doctor of the Catholic Church, Bishop of Hippo Regia, Africa, CONFESSIONS 3:8:15).
"The pagans were addicted to the love of boys, and one of their wise men made a law that pederasty...should not be allowed to slaves, as if it was an honorable thing; and they had houses for this purpose, in which it was openly practiced. And if all that was done among them was related, it would be seen that they openly outraged nature, and there was none to restrain them...As for their passion for boys, whom they called their paedica, it is not fit to be named" (Saint John Chrysostom [b. Antioch 347 A.D. - d. Comana, Pontus 407 A.D.], Father and Doctor of the Catholic Church, Patriarch of Constantinople, HOMILIES ON TITUS, 5).
"All of these affections [in Romans 1:26-27]...were vile, but chiefly the mad lust after males; for the soul is more the sufferer in sins, and more dishonored than the body in diseases" (Saint John Chrysostom [b. Antioch 347 A.D. - d. Comana, Pontus 407 A.D.], Father and Doctor of the Catholic Church, Patriarch of Constantinople, HOMILIES ON ROMANS, 4).
John-Paul 2 Wants the HAIL MARY Changed!
"Vatican City - Pope John Paul II thinks the Hail Mary should really begin 'Rejoice, Mary filled with subrace'" (Catholic News Service, Friday, June 14, 1996 A.D.).
"The heretics, all of whom are children of the Devil and clearly bear the sign of God's reprobation, have a horror of the Hail Mary" (Saint Louis DeMontfort, THE SECRET OF THE ROSARY, p. 45).
Is it any wonder, John-Paul 2, that for these and your many other crimes of heresy, you force Us to agree with that Father of the Catholic Church who expressed most strongly his contempt for the writings of the Popes: "Those insolent and puffed up Occidentals, who would only sanction false doctrine"(Saint Basil the Great [b. Caesarea, Cappadocia 329 A.D. - d. Caesarea, Cappadocia 379 A.D.], Doctor of the Catholic Church, Bishop of Caesarea, Benedictine edition, iii. 301, Epistles 239 and 214.) In the same place Saint Basil the Great says that he would not received the letters of the popes if they fell from Heaven! The reason why he was so upset was because of the public support which was given at Rome to the open adherence to the Sabellian heresy by pope Marcellus I [Wednesday, May 27, 308 or Friday, June 26, 308 - Saturday, January 16, 309]!
So, John-Paul 2, here is a pope after your own heart, the heretic, pope Marcellus I [Wednesday, May 27, 308 or Friday, June 26, 308 - Saturday, January 16, 309]! Of course, you two are not the only popes who have been heretics! But that is another l-o-n-g story!
John-Paul 2 Continues the Invalid and Illegal "New Mass", Etc.!
We have seen for Ourself the aftermath of the changes of Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965] to the liturgical Rites for offering the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the Seven Sacraments, all of which, even in their Latin texts, are per se invalid and illegal. YOU should be ashamed of yourself, John-Paul 2, you and all of your clergy, who have done so much harm to the salvation of immortal souls, not only by continuing to let homosexual clergy and homosexual pedophile clergy continue to function in your parish churches -which property used to belong to the Roman Catholic Church - but also by taking advantage of the ignorance of your own Laity by continuing to impose upon them the updated 16th Century Protestant supper-meal, Sophistly called a "memorial meal" (THE GENERAL INSTRUCTION AND THE NEW ORDER OF MASS, ICEL-International Committee on English in the Liturgy-Sacred Congregation of Rites Decree, April 6, 1969, Benno Card. Gut, Prefect of the S.R.C., President of the Consilium, Chapter II, # 7) as well as a "Supper" where it is written that "The Lord's Supper is the assembly or gathering together of the people of God, with a priest presiding, to celebrate the memorial of the lord. [12]" (THE GENERAL INSTRUCTION AND THE NEW ORDER OF MASS, ICEL-International Committee on English in the Liturgy-Sacred Congregation of Rites Decree, April 6, 1969, Benno Card. Gut, Prefect of the S.R.C., President of the Consilium, Chapter II, # 7.)
Perhaps all of the Mortal Sins you have committed because of the continued use, by yourself personally, and all the rest of the Vatican 2 church clergy, be they the homosexuals, the homosexual pedophiles, or whoever else is left among the thinned ranks your clergy, it is Our duty to remind ALL of you that "if anyone dies unrepentant in the state of Mortal Sin, he will undoubtedly be tormented forever in the fires of an everlasting Hell" (Pope Innocent IV, Sinibaldo Fieschi [Thursday, June 25, 1243 - Monday, December 7, 1254], Epistle to the Bishop of Tusculum, 1254 A.D.). But of course, to YOU, JP-2, Heaven, Purgatory and Hell are all words used to describe Never-Never Land floating around in the Platonistic World of Dreams-which for all of you will become your worst nightmare-HERETICS, HELL IS REAL!!!
Wherefore, We may no longer keep silence, lest We should seem to fail in Our duty and lest the kindness that, in the hope of wiser counsels, We have hitherto privately given you, should be set down to the lack of diligence in the discharge of Our obligations realizing the Truth that is founded upon Sacred Scripture, which, if We do not do, We, as you already have, betray the Truth: "For with the belief of the heart we obtain justice, but with the confession of the mouth, we obtain salvation" (Romans 10:10).
But what is that Truth which We have received? "Teach ye all nations...to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you" (Matthew 28:19).
So, woe are We if We cover the Truth in silence when We are bidden to instruct therewith. Wherefore also those who were furnished with the teachings of the Lord never neglected to exhort those who tried to introduce heretical novelties and changes into the immaculate Church of Christ and to warn them with entreaties to desist from the heretical error of teaching falsehood-at least by their silence.
Consequently, the holy Church of God must be freed from the errors of teachers like you! Let everyone in the Vatican 2 church, beginning with its head, yourself, confess with Us the formula of Truth and Apostolic Tradition, the evangelical and Apostolic rule of Faith. It is past time to REPENT and once more become a Catholic!
If, however, you should refuse, then you should know that for such contempt you will have to make satisfaction to the Divine judgment of Christ before the Judge of all, Who is in heaven, to Whom We Ourselves shall give an account when He shall come in judgment to those Sacred Orders to which We have been called.
We call you to give an account, in the fullness of Our own Apostolic Offices, for "not to oppose error is to approve of it, and not to defend the truth is to suppress it. Not to confound evil men when we can do it is no less a sin than to encourage them" (Felix III [Saturday, March 13, 483 - Saturday, March 1, 492]).
But not just for an account of what We have already covered above, but there is even more! Yet do not think that We patronize you, nor should you flatter yourself, John-Paul 2, thinking that We have been watching your every move! No, We have much more important things to do than that. However, some of the other things which you have done have not gone entirely unnoticed either!
Case in point is your old "buddy", Abbé Georges De Nantes and his LIBER ACCUSATIONIS SECUNDUS, Second Book of Accusation Against Pope John Paul II. Because you may have consigned your copy of it to file 13, We hereby give you an opportunity to refresh your memory! You will find it attached as an Appendix to this Public Letter.
Also, because We are making this document public knowledge - because you have failed to respond or even acknowledge Our previous Letters to you (which were only a few pages in length) - those who will be reading this on the Internet will probably have never heard of, let along read, the LIBER ACCUSATIONIS SECUNDUS, Second Book of Accusation Against Pope John Paul II, which will be twenty years old next year, 2003 A.D.! Interestingly, to the best of Our knowledge, they still remain unrefuted by YOU!
Although this work is not short, yet when everyone reads the details of this work, each person will understand much better, by such laborious analysis on the part of the author, who you really are, JOHN-PAUL 2!
Your theatrical talents and other abilities of thespianism, which you learned to hone when studying to be an actor, apparently around the time you got married?, which skills you have put to good use as "pope" and for which you deserve the highest award which can be given to an actor for your continuous acting role as "pope" all these terrible years, will now be put in further jeopardy, which, after the preceding, should not require much more proof by anyone, and further substantiate Our position concerning you and your heretical teachings!
Despite the fact that you do not seem to take your responsibilities and duties before God seriously, We do! We recall these words of wisdom and ask You to meditate upon them: "Do not be one of those timorous physicians who like their tranquility more than the saving of the sick...Even though Herodias should dance before Herod, should ask for John's head and should obtain it from the detestable King, John's duty is to cry out: "NON LICET!" [IT IS NOT PERMITTED!] (Ivo of Chartres, LETTER, # 24, to Bishop Hugh of Lyons, October, 1094 A.D.)
Consider also one of your predecessors as well, who told his Mother: "Mother, you do not realize what it means to be a Bishop. I shall lose my soul if I neglect my duty" (Giuseppe Sarto [the future St. Pius X] to his mother upon his appointment as Bishop of Mantua when she congratulated him.)
You Pray What You Believe
And
You Believe What You Pray
Celestine I [Saturday, September 10, 422 - Tuesday, July 27, 432 ] taught the principle: Legem Credendi Lex Statuit Supplicandi (The Liturgical form of prayer becomes the standard of Faith). This is sometimes shortened to simply Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi: The Law of Praying is the Law of Believing, i.e. you express by public, exterior liturgical acts of worship, sacrifice and sacrament, the interior beliefs of your faith. Thus, you pray what you believe and you believe what you pray.
Automatic Excommunication of JP-2 and all Clergy of the Vatican 2 church
On this basis, it should be self-evident to everyone, that WHAT you pray in using the updated 16th Century Protestant supper-memorial-meal, even by definition, further proven by the actual liturgical rite itself, is not only NOT Catholic, it is PROTESTANT!
Therefore, there may be some people who wonder why We do not excommunicate you, John-Paul 2, and all of your cardinals, bishops, other prelates, priests and the rest of the clergy of the Vatican 2 church?!
Actually, many of you, and most probably all of your clergy, and without the shadow of a doubt, YOU, yourself, John-Paul 2, have already been automatically excommunicated from the Roman Catholic Church!
For example, you all have been excommunicated by at least some of the Canons of the Roman Catholic Council of Trent, most especially by the following Canons, and also by Pope Saint Pius V, Antonio-Michele Ghislieri [Friday, January 7, 1566 - Monday, May 1, 1572] in virtue of his Papal Bull, QUO PRIMUM TEMPORE, as cited below.
Session 13
Thursday, October 11, 1551 A.D.
Canons of the Roman Catholic Council of Trent on the Most Holy Eucharist
"Canon 1. If anyone denies that in the Sacrament of the Most Holy Eucharist are contained truly, really and substantially the Body and Blood together with the Soul and Divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ and consequently the whole Christ, but says that He is in it only as in a sign, or figure or force; let him be anathema [i.e. automatically excommunicated].."
"Canon 2. If anyone says that in the Sacred and Holy Sacrament of the Eucharist the substance of the bread and wine remains conjointly with the Body and Blood of our Lord Jesus Christ and denies that wonderful and singular change of the whole substance of the bread into the Body and the whole substance of the wine into the Blood, the appearances only of bread and wine remaining, which change the Catholic Church most aptly calls TRANSUBSTANTIATION; let him be anathema [i.e. automatically excommunicated]."
Session 22
Monday, September 17, 1562 A.D.
Canons of the Roman Catholic Council of Trent on the Mass
In Session 22 of the Roman Catholic Council of Trent, held on Monday, September 17, 1562, A.D., the Council first taught what the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is. Then it issued nine canons, the violations of these laws being the penalty of automatic excommunication. But the Vatican 2 church seems to very conveniently not want its own Liaty to know anything about their existence! For their convience, and to jog your memory, and hopefully, the desire of true repentance, here they are:
CANONS ON THE SACRIFICE OF THE MASS
CANON I If any one saith, that in the Mass a true and real Sacriflce is not offered to God; or, that to be offered is nothing else but that Christ is given us to eat; let him be anathema.
CANON II If any one saith, that by those words, Do this for the commemoration of me (Luke xxii. 19), Christ did not institute the Apostles Priests; or, did not ordain that they, and other Priests should offer His own Body and Blood; let him be anathema.
CANON III If any one saith, that the Sacrifice of the Mass is only a sacrifice of praise and of thanksgiving; or, that it is a bare commemoration of the Sacrifice consummated on the Cross, but not a propitiatory sacrifice; or, that it profits him only who receives; and that it ought not to be offered for the living and the dead for sins, pains, satisfactions, and other necessities; let him be anathema.
CANON IV If any one saith, that, by the Sacrifice of the Mass, a blasphemy is cast upon the most Holy Sacrifice of Christ consummated on the Cross; or, that it is thereby derogated from; let him be anathema.
CANON V If any one saith, that it is an imposture to celebrate Masses in honour of the saints, and for obtaining their intercession with God, as the Church intends; let him be anathema.
CANON VI If any one saith, that the Canon of the Mass contains errors, and is therefore to be abrogated [abolished]; let him be anathema.
CANON VII If any one saith, that the ceremonies, vestments, and outward signs, which the Catholic Church makes use of in the celebration of Masses, are incentives to impiety, rather than offices of piety; let him be anathema.
CANON VIII If any one saith, that Masses, wherein the Priest alone communicates Sacramentally, are unlawful, and are, therefore, to be abrogated [abolished; let him be anathema.
CANON IX If any one saith, that the Rite of the Roman Church, according to which a part of the Canon and the words of Consecration are pronounced in a low tone, is to be condemned; or, that the Mass ought to be celebrated in the vulgar tongue only; or, that water ought not to be mixed with the wine that is to be offered in the chalice, for that it is contrary to the institution of Christ; let him be anathema.
Please note that this 22nd Session of the Council of Trent did not take place until Monday, September 17, 1562, A.D. To put things into proper perspective, it should be noted historically that there had already been 45 Protestant Supper-Meals which had been made up (some of them revised several times by 1562!) and that the 46th Protestant Supper-Meal, which the Protestants used to replace what Jesus Christ had perfectly instituted, namely, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, saw the light of day in 1562, namely the THE BOOK OF COMMON ORDER, which was the 2nd Updated Version of The Forme of Prayers which was used in Scotland and had been pieced together by an ex-Roman Catholic Priest, namely Father John Knox [c. 1505 A.D. - 1572 A.D.].
The point is that the Protestants had not only thrown out the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, beginning with the guiding force of the first ex-Catholic Priest, Father Martin Luther, O.S.A. [1483 A.D. - 1546 A.D.], who had proposed a German “mass” as early as 1519 A.D., and who was taken at his word on Christmas Day, December 25, 1521 A.D., at Wittenberg by Andreas Rudolph Bodenstein [b. c. 1480 A.D. - d. 1541 A.D.], a.k.a. Carlstadt or Karlstadt who appeared in the Castle Church without vestments and did a Protestant Supper-Meal “mass”, a.k.a. a Protestant Evangelical Meal, without the Canon, but, because of their vast experience, they had become "professional" Protestant Supper-Meal composers by 1562 A.D.!
You will note that Canons 6, 8, and 9 above deal with condemning, changing and/or abolishing the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass-the penalty for doing this being automatic excommunication. But this is exactly what the Protestants like Luther, Knox, Cranmer, etc. had accomplished - they had abolished the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, replacing it with their Protestant Supper Meals which a few might have still called a "mass", although it was a "mass" in name only!
Then on Tuesday, July 14, 1570, an infallible Roman Catholic Pope, Saint Pius V, Antonio-Michele Ghislieri [Friday, January 7, 1566 - Monday, May 1, 1572], issued an infallible document binding ALL Roman Catholics, at that time and until the end of the world, not to change the Catholic Missal which he had just published for offering the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. This Missal had been restored to the way Mass was offered at least as far back as the Sacramentary (Missal) of Gregory I [Friday, September 3, 590 - Monday, March 12, 604], and possibly even earllier than that.
This infallible document included a penalty of automatic excommunication also for violating its decrees, although it was written in the style common for the Popes of that and previous centuries to write.
It is interesting how it seems that the Vatican 2 church does not want anyone to know about this very important infallible Papal Document, or Papal Bulla or Bull as it was called in those days, by the name of QUO PRIMUM TEMPORE!?
Why? Probably because ordinary people just might get the idea from reading Canons 6, 8 and 9 of the Council of Trent and QUO PRIMUM TEMPORE that Pope Paul 6 Giovanni Battista Montini [Friday, June 21, 1963 - Sunday, August 6, 1978], and ALL of his clergy, i.e., all of the cardinals, bishops and priests of the Vatican 2 church who use the "New Mass", or the "Novus Ordo Missae" as Paul 6 called it, are automatically EXCOMMUNICATED from the Roman Catholic Church!? This, of course, includes YOU, too, JP-2!
Historically, these Canons came about for a reason. One historian writes that "from the tenth century, people took all manner of liberties with the text of the Missal. It was the time of farced Kyries and Glorias, of dramatic and even theatrical ritual, of endlessly varying and lengthy prefaces, into which interminable accounts of stories from Bible history and lives of saints were introduced. This tendency did not even spare the Canon...The Council of Trent (1545-1563) restrained this tendency and ordered that "the holy Canon composed many centuries ago" should be kept pure and unchanged; it also condemned those who say that the "Canon of the Mass contains errors and should be changed" (Sess. 22, Chap. 4, canon 6; Denzinger 819, 830.) Pope [St.] Pius V (1566-1572) published an authentic edition of the Roman Missal in 1570 and accompanied it with a Bull [QUO PRIMUM TEMPORE] forbidding anyone to either add, or in any way change any part of it. This Missal is to be the only one used in the West, and everyone is to conform to it, except that local uses which can be proved to have existed for more than 200 years are to be kept...Since [St.] Pius V our Canon, then, has been brought back to its original simplicity...So that of all liturgical prayers in the Christian world, no one is more ancient nor more venerable than the Canon of the Roman Mass" (Adrian Fortescue, CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA, Volume 3, pp. 260-261, s.v. Canon of the Mass, 1908; emphasis added).
QUO PRIMUM TEMPORE was printed at the very beginning of the MISSALE ROMANUM, the Roman Missal. Saint Pius V, Antonio-Michele Ghislieri [Friday, January 7, 1566 - Monday, May 1, 1572] forbade any changes to the Ancient Roman Rite of Mass at any time in the future and attached penalties for disobedience. We quote in part from his Papal Bull:
"Therefore, let all men everywhere embrace and observe what has been handed down by the Holy Roman Church, the Mother and Teacher of the other Churches, and let not Masses be sung or read according to any Rite other than that of the Missal published by Us. [N.B. This applies specifically to the Ancient Roman Rite, i.e. it was never intended to be applied to any of the valid and approved ancient Eastern Rites of which there are many.] This ordinance applies henceforth afterwards and FOREVER....this present Constitution, henceforth VALID IN PERPETUITY [i.e. this law will remain in effect until the end of the world!], We ORDER and enjoin that this Our recently published [in 1570 A.D.] Missal MUST NEVER BE ADDED TO, THAT NONE OF IT BE OMITTED, AND THAT NONE OF IT BE CHANGED UNDER PENALTY...Therefore, NO ONE WHOSOEVER is permitted to alter this letter...Should anyone, however, presume to commit such an act, he should know that he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul..." (Saint Pius V, Antonio-Michele Ghislieri [Friday, January 7, 1566 - Monday, May 1, 1572], QUO PRIMUM TEMPORE, Tuesday, July 14, 1570.)
Conclusion
In conclusion, there are many other things We could write to confound your heresies and to continue to call for your repentance and your conversion to the Catholic Church, outside of which there is no salvation. For example, We could carefully present a theological treatise, based upon the principles of Thomistic Theology, as well as the principles of Scholastic Philosophy, which would completely prove that the Novus Ordo Missae, the "new mass", the Vatican 2 church updated 16th Century Protestant supper-memorial-meal, is per se invalid, even in its Latin original!
But all of that would make this Letter ten, fifty, even a hundred times longer because "it is a shorter thing and sooner done to write heresies than to answer them" (Saint Thomas More [b. London, England, 1477 A.D. - martyred on Tower Hill, Saturday, July 6, 1535 A.D.], THE APOLOGY OF SIR THOMAS MORE, April 1533 A.D.)
However, We have better things to do than to compose letters to you which you never see, or at least, read?! We note that the automatic excommunications of Trent, Quo Primum Tempore, etc. help to explain why your priests go around claiming that "God is NOT in the punishment business!" This is nothing less than wishful thinking! Have you never read the Scriptures, including the Apocalypse?! Consider this: "And there came down fire from God out of Heaven, and devoured them; and the Devil, who seduced them, was cast into the pool of fire and brimstone, where both the beast and the FALSE PROPHET shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever" (Apocalypse 20:9-10)!
"He, that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith to the churches" (Apocalypse 2:7).
"Amen. Come, Lord Jesus. The Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen" (Apocalypse 22:20-21).
X Jacobus Maria DeJesus, C.M.F., D.D., A.D.N.J.C.
Appendix
LIBER ACCUSATIONIS SECUNDUS
Second Book of Accusation Against Pope John Paul II
A COMPLAINT AGAINST OUR BROTHER IN THE FAITH, KAROL WOJTYLA,
ON ACCOUNT OF HERESY, SCHISM, AND SCANDAL
by
The Abbé Georges De Nantes
Submitted to the Holy See on 13 May 1983 by the Abbé de Nantes
and two hundred delegates of tbe League of the Catholic Counter Reformation
Contents
The Accusation
1. Of man's transcendence and kingship: your blasphemy
2. Of Jesus Christ's divinity and kingship: your apostasy
3. Legitimate suspicion and withdrawal of obedience towards a perfidious
pontiff
Innovator, you are betraying Christ
1. The break in Poland: from Sapieha to Wojtyla
2. The break at Rome: from Pius XII to John Paul II
3. A philosophical break: from the Catholic religion to Wojtylian humanism
You are a modernist, making Rome the seat of the Antichrist
Corrupter, you are putting Christ to death
1. You are suffocating religion
2. You are destroying the Church
3. You will ruin the world!
Who will convince you of your catastrophic lack of realism?
The Judgement
THE ACCUSATION
Most Holy Father,
In the same way and for the same serious reasons which made me decide to produce a Book of Accusation against Pope Paul VI for heresy, schism and scandal ten years ago, and to take it to him myself in the company of many and worthy persons on 10th April 1973 - a book from which I retract nothing today and which I make it my duty to present to you officially as an eternal witness to the faith of the people of God against the heresies, schisms and scandals of that fatal pontificate - so I am led to formulate the same accusations against Your Person - accusations hitherto unheard of in the Roman Church despite my unworthiness and nothingness, for even more serious reasons and in still worse circumstances. Though this SECOND BOOK OF ACCUSATION may appear to be a repetition of the first, which is understandable given the fact that you declare yourself to be the spiritual son and continuator of Paul VI, adopting and continuing what I imputed to him as heresy, schism and scandal, it is in fact more grave than the first accusation. For what in Paul VI were daring hypotheses, spectacular innovations, empty words, in a word heteropraxy, with you is a reinforced block of philosophical theses, projects and desires strictly defining a categorical heterodoxy.
It must be said to your face, Most Holy Father, that your religion is no longer that of the Roman Catholic Church, Christ's unique Church, whose Head you are. Your religion is the religion of man who makes himself god and not the religion of God, the Son of God, Who made Himself man. For the one excludes the other. Someone must rise up in the Church and make bold to tell you these things openly, publicly, bluntly and without hesitation, because it is the revealed truth on which our supreme good depends: our ultimate end, the honour of the Church and the future credibility of her infallible magisterium, the salvation of our souls and the tranquillity of our consciences in rebellion against your teaching. And finally, Most Holy Father, your own salvation depends upon it, if your soul will deign to profit from this remonstrance. For none of the Church's children, especially of her pastors, of her supreme Pastors, can be saved unless he hold the most pure, sound and entire Catholic faith.
For you are no longer Catholic, you are no longer Christian for it is all one, even though you remain in name and in fact the Sovereign Pontiff of this Church whose faith and unity you reject from the depths of your will and intellect. Of course, you are the idol of the masses. That is partly due to the power of the opinion formers, held for the most part by the Church's worst enemies and by perfidious modernists, whose protector and accomplice you are. You are spared by these people because they dominate you and hold you at their mercy. In part, you reign over the Catholic and believing masses because you mix much apparent Christian discourse and great manifestations of piety with your bland humanism, thus misleading them. It is also certain that our bishops and many priests who have come up through the ranks of Catholic Action have been poisoned by modernism and progressivism for a quarter, even for a half-century, in many a country including yours and mine. As for the rest, the credulity of Catholics when hearing the Pope is infinite, not that they can be too much blamed for that.
Have I one deed or one text on which to rest such accusations? I have five hundred, Most Holy Father. But to begin with I shall give only one on which I am prepared to stake my entire faith and life. One on which the whole case could be judged; it is one of your recurring themes. That of the Kingship of Jesus Christ, a kingship which for you is not that of God made man, but that of Man whom you proclaim to be god. You invoke Christ, you mangle the Gospels in order to strip God of His divine and royal attributes, with which you then adorn man, Man become your idol, the object of your worship and service, of your love and striving. I take to witness what remains of the Catholic faith in your soul and in the souls of the cardinals and the ministers of the competent dicasteries who will have to learn of my complaint. I summon the Authority of the Church, her sacred hierarchy, her faithful people, each and everyone, in so far as my powerlessness permits, but in the name of God the Father, Son and Holy Ghost, to say openly and clearly whether such humanism in place of orthodox and Catholic Christianity is worthy of their unfeigned assent and adherence, or whether it merits anathema. Thence will this extraordinary trial be decided, from which one of the two parties will emerge acquitted and the other condemned, from which one will emerge sanctified by the trial and the other, failing recognition of error, public retraction and due reparation, will be doomed to the flames of hell and to eternal damnation.
May the Sacred Hearts of Jesus and Mary come to our aid!
(HTML Editor: Due to size limitation, the rest of this Appendix cannot be included. Our sincere apologies. Thank you for your understanding.)