This is the photographic evidence
that the pope of the
Vatican 2 church, pope JP-2, a.k.a.
pope John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya
[Monday, October 16,
1978 - present] was publicly exorcised by
a PAGAN AZTEC rite of exorcism in the MESS
HALL where the Miraculous Picture of Our Lady of Guadalupe has been hung!
Some American television news
reports also correctly identified this "ceremony" as an "EXORCISM"!
But "no man can serve two masters.
For either he will hate the one, and love the other: or he will sustain
the one, and despise the other. You can NOT serve God and mammon". (Matthew
Chapter 6:24; emphasis added)
"HE that is not with Me, IS AGAINST ME: and HE that
gathereth not with Me, SCATTERETH."
(Matthew Chapter 12:30; emphasis added).
"And to the angel [i.e. Bishop] of the Church of Sardis,
write: These things saith He, that hath the Seven Spirits of
God, and the seven stars: I know thy works, that
thou hast the name of being alive: and THOU ART DEAD. Be watchful
and strengthen the things that remain, which are ready to die. For I FIND
NOT thy works complete [acceptable] before My God. Have in mind [remember]
therefore in what manner thou hast received and heard [i.e. the Catholic
Tradition]: and OBSERVE [it], and DO PENANCE.
IF then THOU SHALT NOT watch, I WILL COME TO THEE as a thief,
and THOU SHALT NOT KNOW AT WHAT HOUR I WILL COME TO [JUDGE] THEE.
(Apocalypse 3:1-3; emphasis added).
Therefore, it should be self-evident
to everyone in the entire world that this Pagan Aztec public exorcism which
was performed by several Aztec Priestesses upon the Vatican 2 church pope,
JP-2,
was an effort to drive out the
Devils - this is WHAT an Exorcism is - which posses the pope of the Vatican
2 church, pope JP-2, a.k.a. pope John-Paul 2!!! This took place
on Thursday, August 1, 2002 A.D.
This Issue:
Reparation Needed to Our Lady of Guadalupe for this
PAGAN ritual of exorcism Performed
in the MESS HALL where her Miraculous Image has been hung!
Vatican 2 church pope,
JP-2, must return to the MESS HALL where the Miraculous Image
of Our Lady of Guadalupe has been
hung and do public Penance in sackcloth and ashes before her Miraculous
Picture before God calls him to Judgment!
Plus
Various photos of popes of the
Vatican 2 church doing other things forbidden to Roman
Catholics!
Plus
A brief review of some things regarding the changes
to the Catholic Traditional Rite of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass
Editorial
Dear Fellow Catholics:
Charitas Christi urget Nos.
"The Charity of Christ urges us on" (2 Corinthians 5:14).
This is the motto on Our Coat of Arms.
Unfortunately, today many people do not really know and/or understand
what True Charity really is. Whereas perhaps
in previous Centuries it might have been unnecessary to define Charity,
yet because of the apparent great confusion in the minds of many millions
and millions of people today, in great part as the result of the propagation
of the heresies of Modernism, who have in this process lost what some authors
call "the Catholic mind" or "Catholic mentality", with the definition of
Charity below, We take that first step towards the restoration of "the
Catholic mind" or "Catholic mentality" so that Catholics in particular
and non-Catholics in general may have a more correct knowledge and understanding
of charity.
What is Charity?
"CHARITY (Love). Charity is the first and foremost of all
Christian virtues, including the theological virtues, to which it belongs.
Because charity is the primary, essential effect of sanctifying grace,
the terms grace and charity are used interchangeably. Grace
and charity are not identical. but are intimately connected as fire and
heat, sun and light. Grace elevates and perfects nature and the will indirectly,
by producing within the will the virtue of charity, which is the perfection
of the will. Grace and charity are expressions of supernatural life, grace
in the line of being and charity in the line of action. Charity causes
man to love God, who loves man directly. On the strength of such reciprocal
love, charity constitutes true friendship with God. In Christ's own
words: 'I will not now call you servants...but friends' (John 15:15).
OBJECT. The person loved constitutes the object of charity. The object
of supernatural charity is twofold: the primary object is God Himself;
the secondary object is man destined to become a child of God through grace
or participation in divine life. Through charity we love all men; we love
all men precisely because they are children of God. Though charity has
a twofold object, it is essentially one; we either possess charity in its
entirety or we lack it completely. For this reason St. John teaches that
'if a man says he loves God and hates his brother, he is a liar.' For this
reason, too. Christ states that love of neighbor is the sign by which we
shall be recognized as His disciples (John 13:35).
The love of God consists in desiring the divine good, in loving
God for His own sake. This love is primarily expressed through an internal
act of the will, whereby we desire and rejoice at the fact that God is
infinitely good, omnipotent and loving in Himself. Thus, the first three
petitions of the Lord's Prayer are sublime expressions of our love of God.
Furthermore, this love is expressed by external works designed to promote
the divine good, insofar as this can be attained by our activities. These
include: the observance of God's commandments, a conformity to His
manifest will, the promotion of His honor and glory, by making Him known
and loved by others, etc.
EMINENCE. Charity, which prompts us to love God Himself and His adopted
children and our fellowmen, is the most eminent of all Christian virtues.
Proof of this is found in Christ's reference to the love of God and neighbor
as the first and greatest commandment. This is not to say that charity
enjoys a primacy of value over all other moral precepts. Its primacy is
one of degree. The precept of charity is an altogether special precept,
since charity is the reason and purpose for the observance of other precepts.
To love God is the purpose of life. God, the highest good and ultimate
end of life. can only be attained through love. It is only because we are
bound to love God that we are required to observe the other commandments.
In other words, if we arc obliged to pray, forbidden to work on Sunday,
forbidden to blaspheme, etc., it is because such precepts are necessary
to preserve and increase the love of God in us. And if we are obliged to
honor our parents, forbidden to kill, steal, lie, etc., it is only because
such precepts are necessary to preserve and increase proper love of self
and neighbor. All the other precepts depend on the commandment of charity,
in the same way that the morality of the means employed in the performance
of our actions depends upon our end in view. Hence, St. Paul calls charity
the plenitude or fulfillment of the Law (moral). He who loves God, self,
and neighbor with a true and operative love that dominates
his entire activity. always performs good, because to love is to want good
and nothing else. This is the profound meaning of St. Augustine's words:
'Love and do whatever you will.' He who wants good, because he loves and
does whatever he wills, always does good.
The cause of charity is God, i.e., the Triune God or the three Divine
Persons together. But the virtue of charity is especially attributed to
the Holy Ghost, who is the Person of the reciprocal love between the Father
and the Son. God infuses charity with sanctifying grace, which makes us
His adopted children and permits us to call Him our Father. God
also increases charity within us, once it has been infused. In children
not vet possessing the use of reason, the infusion of charity is effected
by God alone, without any cooperation on their part. This God accomplishes
through baptism, the administration of which, however, requires human cooperation.
In a person who has attained the use of reason, neither infusion nor increase
of charity can take place without the subject's cooperation, the final
act of which. at least, is an act of charity. We collaborate in the increase
of charity by performing acts of love, by assisting at Mass, by receiving
the sacraments. especially Holy Communion, by praying, by performing good
and meritorious deeds in the state of grace. We collaborate in two ways:
(a) by disposing ourselves toward a more fervent act of love in the performance
of the above-mentioned deeds; b) by actually eliciting a more fervent act
of love. A more fervent act of love actually increases the degree of charity,
which, once acquired, abides within us. Mortal sin removes charity entirely.
Venial sin does not diminish charity as such, but decreases its fervor
and, as a result, hinders any increase. A Christian must not only
avoid losing charity through mortal sin, but he must strive to increase
the charity he already possesses, by avoiding venial sin, performing good
works, frequenting the sacraments, eliciting fervent acts of love of God.
Charity toward one's neighbor prompt us, first of all, to seek the good
of our fellowmen, i.e., to desire the well-being of our neighbor as our
own. Love of neighbor manifests itself in external acts designed to procure,
as far as lies within us, the well-being of our fellowmen. The main difference
between love of God and love of neighbor consists in this, that the good
or well-being of our fellowmen is more dependent on our assistance and
cooperation. God is not. Charity prompts us to avoid, as much as possible,
whatever may bring displeasure, sadness, suffering, or injury to our neighbor.
On the positive side, it prompts us to do everything possible to render
our neighbor's life good and happy. The words “as much as possible” refer
not to absolute, but moral, possibility.
Love itself must be without limitations, but the external acts of charity
are necessarily subject to the limitations of our powers and means. Our
power, time, and goods can only be expended to relieve a specific need
of a neighbor. Moreover, since everyone is bound to love self, it
is perfectly legitimate to provide for one's own needs first. Indeed, in
some instances this is a matter of duty. The rule of charity may be formulated
as follows: Love God first, then yourself, lastly others; but genuinely
love all three. This general rule gives rise to certain regulatory norms
of a well-ordered charity: (a) never help yourself or your neighbor
if that means offending God; (b) love of neighbor does not oblige
one to succor the needs of another at the expense of incurring similar
damage or inconvenience to self; (c) perfect charity consists in extending
aid when there is no strict obligation to do so, to make sacrifices beyond
the call of duty, to reduce personal needs in order to lend greater assistance
to a neighbor (see Neighbor, Almsgiving, Enemy).
It is to be well understood, however, that assisting the needy is but
a small part of the practice of love of neighbor. Many Christians do not
sufficiently realize that charity must be effectively or externally practiced
toward any person with whom they come into contact.
Charity must animate all our activities and make us kind, helpful, and
courteous to all: superiors, equals and subordinates; rich and poor; one's
own family and strangers. Charity demands that we strive to check our own
whims and to correct any defects of character or manners that make us unkind,
discourteous, or unpleasant in our dealings and conversations with others.
The thought of charity to others renders life happier. The principal
motive must be that, in loving our neighbor, we love Christ, who said:
“That which you have done to the least of these my brethren. you have done
it to me.” Christ. who is present in our neighbor, expects to receive from
us not only alms and other material assistance, but also courteous and
kind treatment. Ben." (DICTIONARY OF MORAL THEOLOGY, Compiled
under the direction of Francesco Cardinal Roberti, Prefect of the Supreme
Tribunal of the Apostolic Signature, Edited under the direction of Monsignor
Pietro Palazzini, Secretary of the Sacred Congregation of the Council,
Translated from the Second Italian Edition Under the Direction of Henry
J. Yannone, S.T.L., Charity, pp. 211-213).
How is the Virtue of Charity Exercised
in the Pastoral Ministry?
Because "Pastoral Authority is no art of compromise and concession,
but the art of saving souls through the truth" (Giuseppe
Cardinal Siri, Archbishop of Genoa, Italy [born in Genoa, Italy on May
20, 1906 - died May 2, 1989]; emphasis added), it should be self-evident
that, just as is the case with natural or biological parents, so too, is
the case with spiritual parents, which includes not only God-Parents but
also Prelates and Priests, both natural and spiritual parents are NOT in
a popularity contest, either with their biological or spiritual children.
Rather, all parents, biological and spiritual, exercise the Virtue
of Charity by warning their children of any and all dangers to them. That
is part of the job description all parents have.
So, in other words, Our purpose in presenting all of this data, whether
texts, photographs, etc., and not just in this edition of Catholic,
but
in all of its editions in particular and in all of Our work in general,
is really the proper exercise of the Virtue of Charity which is expressed
in various actions which We do for the Greater Honor and Glory of God and
the Salvation of Immortal Souls through, among other means, this News,
Informational, and Educational, Ecclesiastical Journal Dedicated to Preserving
the Authentic Apostolic Tradition of the Catholic Church On Subjects and
Issues of Importance to the Catholic Church.
One example of how the Virtue of Charity was the motive used and
thereupon exercised in the Pastoral Ministry is that of the famous Patriarch
of Constantinople, who was a Spiritual Father, and also a Father of the
Catholic Church. He writes: “Cease labouring in vain and sowing
upon rock many have been saying to me. But I hearkened to none of them.
For there is hope I said to myself that, God willing, my letter will accomplish
something; but if that which We deprecate should take place, We shall at
least have the advantage of escaping self reproach for keeping silence,
and We shall not be worse than sailors on the sea, who, when they behold
men of their own craft drifting on a plank, because their ship has been
broken to pieces by the winds and waves, take down their sails, and cast
anchor, and get into a boat and try to rescue the men, although strangers,
known to them only in consequence of their calamity. But if the others
were unwilling to be rescued, no one would accuse those of their destruction
who attempted to save them. This is what We offer; but We trust that, by
the Grace of God, YOU also will do your part” (Saint John Chrysostom
[b. Antioch c. 347 A.D. - d. Comana, Pontus 407 A.D.], Patriarch of Constantinople,
Father and Doctor of the Catholic Church, TREATISE ON THE PRIESTHOOD, BOOK
I., AN EXHORTATION TO THEODORE AFTER HIS FALL, LETTER II, # 5; emphasis
added).
Charity Requires a Prelate to be Responsible in
the Discharge of the Duties of His God-Given Office
This also explains why We have taken this wisdom to heart from a
Brother Bishop: "Do not be one of those timourous physicians who
like their tranquility more than the saving of the sick...Even though Herodias
should dance before Herod, should ask for John's head and should obtain
it from the detestable King, John's duty is to cry out: 'NON LICET!' [It
is not permitted!]" (Bishop Ivo of Chartres [b. Beauvais, France,
c. 1040 A.D. - d. Chartres, France, May 30, 1116 A.D.], LETTER # 24, to
Bishop Hugh of Lyons, October, 1094 A.D.)
So, to all of the anti-Catholic public actions
of the Vatican 2 popes, including those proven by the various photographs
of them, which are found in this edition of Catholic,
BECAUSE
of Charity, We have no other choice before God but to speak out with a
loud voice to all of the Vatican 2 popes NON LICET to their public anti-Catholic
actions and to remind them of their automatic excommunications from the
Roman Catholic Church. Please keep in mind that these photographs
are not of Us doing anti-Catholic things; rather, of various Vatican 2
popes doing anti-Catholic things! So do NOT condemn Us just because
We present photographic evidence to you about a Vatican 2 pope doing something
which you do not want to know about because of affected ignorance or some
kind of denial! On the contrary, IF We did NOT do this, then this
omission in the proper exercise of Our God-Given Offices would be a proof
that We HATED the Vatican 2 popes and did not extend the hand of Charity
to them!
A Spiritual Father
Perhaps some of you still do not get it? If so, then consider
this analogy. Does a Mother who warns, and perhaps even spanks her
child whom she observes is about to touch the enticing pretty blue flame
of the gas stove, exercising the Virtue of Charity or is she exercising
one of the seven capital sins, namely, anger? In other words, is
the action of such a Mother motivated by love or by hatred?
IF the Mother was actually angry with her child or actually HATED
her child, that Mother would simply NOT WARN her child and, falling prey
to the vice of secular humanism, the philosophy of which seems to be "If
it feels good, do it", such a Mother, in dereliction of part of the duties
of her Office as a Parent, in this case, as a Mother, would impute to her
child that for her child it must feel good to want to touch the enticing
pretty blue flame on the gas stove so the child should do it, without care
or regard for the penalty, for the censure, for the very bad effects of
such a dangerous action! In the jurisprudence of various countries,
including the United States of America, that would be considered to be
a type of child endangerment and certainly child neglect.
So also then, the same thing in true in the Religious/Spiritual Life!
A Spiritual Father has the duty and obligation to warn others, no matter
who they are, of disastrous dangers if they perform an act which would
hurt their immortal souls by sin. IF We hated such a person, We would
remain silent and say nothing - of course, this does presuppose that We
knew about the event or situation or whatever a priori.
On the other hand, unlike in the material world,
where a child would have a bad burn and a disfigured hand and fingers perhaps
the rest of its life, in the Religious/Spiritual world one's soul can be
restored from the disfigurement of Mortal Sin to its previous state of
Sanctifying Grace in which such disfigurements are totally healed, especially
after all of the temporal punishment due to such Mortal Sins have been
effaced!
This is why NON LICET is such an important
warning to the Vatican 2 pope whom We love in the proper exercise of the
Virtue of Charity which loves each person as a child of God and which loves
each person through God, just as God loves each of His children, including
the Vatican 2 popes.
Some of you may think that We are being harsh
on JP-2 or that We hate him-in justice all real Catholics should
hate the anti-Catholic deeds he has done which are intrinsically
evil and which drag millions and millions and millions of ignorant/innocent
souls to Hell. Therefore, We hate WHAT JP-2 and the other Vatican
2 popes have done, not WHO they are in and of themselves as individual
persons, i.e. as children of God, whom We love in True Charity as children
of God.
pope John-Paul 2
and
Karol Wyotya
True, sometimes it is difficult for someone
else to ascertain Our distinctions between the actions of a person and
the person himself, e.g. JP-2. This is why under This
Issue the caption reads "Vatican 2 church pope, JP-2, Must
Return to the MESS HALL where the Miraculous Image Our Lady of Guadalupe
has been hung And Do Public Penance in Sackcloth and Ashes Before Her Miraculous
Picture Before God Calls him to Judgment!" because We refer directly, although
in a condensed way because of the nature of captions, to the pope of the
Vatican
2 church.
The term "the Vatican 2 church" is based upon
the Roman Catholic theological principle of lex orandi, lex credendi.
Please refer to Catholic,
Volume
2, Issue 3, March 1, 1997 A.D., "What is The 'Vatican 2' church?",
for a more detailed explantion), namely pope John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya
[Monday, October 16, 1978 - present]. This is what the word "pope"
means in this caption.
Please note that We did NOT write: "Karol
Wyotya Must Return to the MESS HALL...And do Public Penance in Sackcloth
and Ashes...." The point is that
it is as the pope of the Vatican
2 church that pope John-Paul 2 must return to her Mess Hall and do
public penance in sackcloth and ashes, but not as the private person
Karol Wyotya.
Please Note: A MESS
HALL, like a RESTAURANT, is a public place where people eat a MEAL,
and since the Vatican 2 church exclusively uses the modernized and otherwise
updated 16th Century Protestant Supper Memorial Meal, it is only logical
that the places WHERE these Supper Memorial Meals are eaten should be called
MESS HALLS!
It is the official teaching of
the Vatican 2 church, found in various places, e.g. Synod Vatican
2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965]
documents, which teach, along with other heretics condenmned
by the Roman Catholic Church, which include the likes of John Scotus Eriugena,
[b. Paris, 810 A.D. - d. 877 A.D.], and Berengar
of Tours, a.k.a. Berengarius of Tours, [b. 999 A.D. - d. 1088
A.D.], that the Mass is merely and only a "memorial meal"
called a "supper" or a "supper meal" or a "memorial supper meal", or a
"supper memorial meal", etc.!
Historiclaly such "supper meal" mania has been
condemned by the Roman Catholic Church. The book, “De Divisione Naturae
[851 A.D.]”, by John Scotus Eriugena, the Father of anti-Scholasticism,
was bad enough because it was filled with the heresies of Pantheism, and
was formally condemned by the Council of Paris [1225 A.D.] which coupled
the condemnation of Eriugena's book with the previous condemnations in
1210 A.D. of the heretical doctrines of Amalric of Chartres and David of
Dinant.
But what really earned John Scotus Eriugena
his well-deserved condemnations was another book he wrote, "De Corpore
et Sanguine Domini" in which he denies the Mystery of the Transubstantiation
among other things!
Here are some examples of where and when he
was condemned by the Roman Catholic Church for his heretical attacks
against the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass:
1) by the Council of Valence in 855 A.D. which
called his heresies pultes Scotorum - the Scottish hodgepodge;
2) by the Council of Valencia in 855 A.D.;
3) by the Council of Langres in 859 A.D.
Finally, this heretic was killed by his own
pupils! Apparently they could no longer stomach his meal or supper
heresies?
Bishop Jacques Bénigne Bossuet [1627
- 1704], Bishop of Meaux, states that the book of Eriugena ("De Corpore
et Sanguine Domini" was “an ambiguous book, where certainly the author
[John Scotus Eriugena] did not always understand himself” [Bossuet, HISTORY
OF THE VARIATIONS OF THE PROTESTANT CHURCHES, Book IV, no. 32.]; emphasis
added). Unfortunately, this heresy was also utilized by the heretic,
Berengar of Tours, and later by the 16th Century Protestants and the 20th
Century Modernists.
The heretic, Berengar of Tours, a.k.a. Berengarius
of Tours, [999 A.D. -1088 A.D.], was also condemned for his heretical teachings
against the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass by the Roman Catholic Church
at various times and places.
Here are some examples of where and when he
was condemned by the Roman Catholic Church for his heretical attacks
against the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass:
1) by the Council of Rheims in 1049 A.D.;
2) by the Council of Rome of 1050 A.D. (a.k.a.
the Lateran Council of 1050 A.D.);
3) by the Council of Vercelli of 1050
A.D.;
4) by the Synod of Paris in 1051 A.D.;
5) by the Council of Tours, c. April, 1054
A.D.;
6) by the Council of Rome, 1059 A.D.;
7) by the Councils of Poitiers of 1075 A.D.;
8) and, by the Council of St. Maixeut of 1076
A.D.
Therefore, NO ONE can ever take the position
that the Roman Catholic Church has NEVER condemned, a priori,
the heretical teachings of the heretical and apostate Vatican 2
church and its heretical and apostate popes, cardinals, bishops, priests,
etc., especially on the issue that the "The Lord's SUPPER
is the assembly or gathering together of the people of God, with a priest
presiding, to celebrate the MEMORIAL of the lord.
[12]" (THE GENERAL INSTRUCTION AND THE
NEW ORDER OF MASS, ICEL-International Committee on English in the Liturgy-Sacred
Congregation of Rites Decree, Sunday, April 6, 1969 A.D., Benno Card. Gut,
Prefect of the S.R.C., President of the Consilium, Chapter II, # 7; emphasis
added.)
God knows the actual motives and intentions
which We have and which We have had regarding pope John-Paul 2 which is
really the same as We had regarding another pope of the Vatican 2
church, namely, pope Paul 6, Giovanni Battista Montini [Friday, June 21,
1963 - Sunday, August 6, 1978], to whom We wrote a PRIVATE Letter on Wednesday,
June 29, 1977 which was, in essence, a NON LICET letter-all of which is
done in True Charity; not false Charity and most certainly not in a hatred
of the person
per se as a child of God.
False Judges
Unfortunately, some people (Here We address them specifically.) "who
strain out a gnat, and swallow a camel" (Matthew 23:24), seeking
to construe at least a shadow of scandal over which to take offense for
their own purposes (whether to try to deride Us, or to discredit Us or
Our teachings or Our warnings or Our Office) against Our exercise of Our
Office, fail to make the necessary distinctions between me as an individual
person and the actions Our Office requires Us to take, for example warning
others with and because of NON LICET, and instead impute the actions said
duty requires of Us, to some kind of major flaw in Our personal character,
e.g. the capital sin of pride and/or anger, simply because they desperately
want to read into Our official acts, or at least Our semi-official acts,
what their prejudices lustfully seek for their own agendas, or to otherwise
examine such things in a non-spiritual way!
This last point is the same purport of the Scripture which God the
Holy Ghost has given to us through the Apostle: "So the things also
that are of God no man knoweth, but the Spirit of God. Now we have
received not the spirit of this world, but the Spirit that is of God; that
we may know the things that are given us from God. Which things also we
speak, not in the learned words of human wisdom; but in the doctrine of
the Spirit, comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
But
the sensual man perceiveth not these things that are of the Spirit of God;
for it is foolishness to him, and he cannot understand, because it is spiritually
examined" (1 Corinthians 2:11-14; emphasis added).
The irony is that at least some of these people are also some of
the actual victims of the Vatican 2 church and apparently
are either tired of Our warnings, do not want to be warned, or condemn
Us because We have warned them because their actions seem to indicate that
they prefer to sit in the cesspool of affected ignorance thinking that
somehow this will "save them" from the Wrath of God on the Day of Judgment?!
On the contrary, "Affected ignorance does not
excuse from guilt, but rather aggravates it since it shows that
a man is so strongly attached to sin that he wishes to incur ignorance
lest he avoid sinning. The Jews therefore sinned, as crucifiers not
only of the Man-Christ, but also as of God" (Saint Thomas Aquinas,
O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. 1274 A.D. in Fossa
Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, SUMMA THEOLOGICA III, 47, 5
Reply to Objection 3).
Perhaps a brief analogy is in order at this point to help to clarify
some of this? The warnings We give others are frequently treated
with hostility! This is not a logical reaction but is an emotional
reaction. In the secular world, which does not understand the spiritual
world, it would be like a police officer stopping a motorist and warning
the motorist that if he would continue driving down the street to the bottom
of the hill, he would drive his car into a rushing river, created by a
very heavy rainfall. But, instead of the motorist thanking the police
officer for his kind and charitable warning, because he is doing his job
and also because he is concerned for the welfare of this motorist, the
motorist begins cursing and swearing at the police officer and calling
him all kinds of nasty names and accuses the police officer of being insane,
inane, or ignorant and stupid, not to mention rude and insulting, and tells
the police officer that he takes personal offense at his arrogant attitude,
and demands that the police officer leave him alone and not to bother him,
not to talk with him and more, that the police officer should be ashamed
of himself for his bitter zeal, and that the police officer must leave
immediately, get out of that place, and go home, and then the motorist,
filled with anger and hatred for the police officer,
drives off, down the hill, at a high rate of speed, unable to wait to drown
himself in the flood waters at the bottom of the hill.
Frequently, this irrational and anti-spiritual
behavior is what We have to deal with too frequently! This is how
We feel when We try to warn others about the Vatican 2 church, its pope
and clergy, especially its homosexual - pedophile clergy, its invalid rites
for the Mass and the Seven Sacraments, its catechism of heresy, its anti-Catholic
actions in public, etc., etc., etc.!
Then some of these people have the audacity
to want to judge Us saying that We have fallen into the pit of that "bitter
zeal" condemned by the holy Apostle, Saint James the Just, the first
Patriarch of Jerusalem, and a first-cousin of Our Lord and Savior, Jesus
Christ. Yes, it is true that Saint James the Just does condemn "bitter
zeal" where he writes: "But if you have bitter zeal, and there be
contentions in your hearts; glory not, and be not liars against the truth"
(James
3:14). Have We been guilty of falling into "bitter zeal"
in the past? Most certainly We have-there is no question about it!
However, by the Grace of God, God the Holy Ghost pointed this out
to Us during one of Our meditations, whether before or after offering the
Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, We no longer remember. Ever since that
time, many years ago, We have written about this, warning others not to
fall into this pit of bitter zeal and have even preached on this very subject!
Since that time, to the best of Our knowledge, by the Grace of God in answering
Our prayers, We have not fallen back into bitter zeal. Deo Gratias
et Mariae! Semper Deo Gratias et Mariae!
One of the very first things We learned about the Spiritual Life
when We entered the seminary, now so many, many years ago, was Virtus
stat in medio. "Virtue stands in the middle." This simply
means that virtue avoids extremes and We have, by the Grace of God, tried
to avoid becoming an extremist, but to remain balanced. Obviously
"bitter zeal" is an extreme of a negative type of zeal in contradistinction
to Holy Zeal which is obviously a positive zeal. So Holy Zeal,
in and of itself, is something which is good. Reflect, for a moment
on the Holy Zeal for the Greater Honor and Glory of God and the Salvation
of Souls which Jesus Christ Himself had, as this Scripture proves:
"And the pasch of the Jews was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem.
And He found in the temple them that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and
the changers of money sitting. And when He had made, as it were,
a scourge of little cords, He drove them all out of the temple, the sheep
also and the oxen, and the money of the changers He poured out, and the
tables He overthrew. And to them that sold doves He said: Take
these things hence, and make not the house of My Father a house of traffic.
And His disciples remembered, that it was written [as a prophecy]:
'The zeal of Thy house hath eaten Me up' [Psalm 68:10]" (John
2:13-17).
Logic would ask if these actions of Jesus Christ in scourging the
money changers who were sitting in the temple and driving them out of the
temple along with their sheep and oxen, plus pouring out their money on
the ground and overthrowing their tables and warning the dove sellers to
get out and not to make "the house of My Father a house of traffic", as
recorded in the Gospel of Saint John, just quoted above, were all acts
of the negative "bitter zeal"?
Answer: Of course not! On the contrary, this was an act
of the positive Holy Zeal, not of the negative "bitter zeal", because God
the Holy Ghost had prophecized this event through the pen of David in his
Psalm, writing: "'The
zeal of Thy house hath eaten Me up'
[Psalm
68:10]. God the Holy Ghost, in His prophecy of this event, did NOT call
it "bitter zeal", although He did call it ZEAL!
Despite the fact that Saint John did not record
it, the condemnation or reproach of Christ for His Holy Zeal, was also
prophecized! Immediately after the first part of this prophecy, came the
second: "For the
zeal of Thy house hath eaten Me up: and the
reproaches of them that reproached Thee are fallen upon Me"
[Psalm
68:10].
A Den of Spiritual Thieves
So this "den of thieves" reproached and condemned
Christ for His Holy Zeal! As a matter of fact, this was when the
leaders of the Jews made the decision to kill Christ! It is written:
"And they came to Jerusalem. And when He was entered into the temple,
He
began to cast out them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew
the tables of the moneychangers, and the chairs of them that sold doves.
And He suffered not that any man should carry a vessel through the temple;
And He taught, saying to them: Is it not written, My house shall
be called the house of prayer to all nations? But you have made
it a den of thieves. Which when the chief priests and the scribes
had heard, they sought how they might destroy Him" (Mark
11:15-18).
Since even before Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday,
October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965], but more especially during
and now after it, the Vatican has become the modern-day counterpart to
this den of thieves with whom Christ dealt with a Holy Zeal! But
these modern-day "thieves" are primarily trying to steal souls for their
master, Satan. The modern-day den of spiritual thieves are trying
to steal souls by various means. For example, through the various
changes they implemented before, but especially during and after Synod
Vatican 2. This den of spiritual thieves have stolen the liturgical
rites for the Catholic Traditional Rites for the Mass and the Seven Sacraments!
But since nothing exists in a vacuum, this den of spiritual thieves realized
that, just as the den of spiritual thieves of the 16th Century, they had
to replace the real thing with the fakes and phonies! So the changes
made by this den of spiritual thieves at Synod Vatican 2, under the leadership
of the Vatican 2 pope, were actually intended to INVALIDATE the Catholic
Traditional Rites for the Mass and the Seven Sacraments! After presenting
these sham gems which this den of thieves put together in their Satanic
workships to replace of the real spiritual gems which Christ Himself instituted,
they then set about to do the same to the Roman Catholic Catholic Faith
and have produced a compendium of heretical teachings which this den of
spiritual thieves propagates under the name of a "catechism" to destroy
the Roman Catholic Faith!
We Reveal the Den of Spiritual Thieves
Therefore, whenever We speak, write, teach
or preach about these horrible things which this den of spiritual thieves
in the Vatican 2 church have done, who all follow the examples and leadership
of the pope of the Vatican 2 church, some people get very upset at Our
ZEAL which they mistake for a negative "bitter zeal", unjustly juxtaposing
the evil this den of spiritual thieves have done and continue to do to
souls with Our revelation to them and explanation to them of these spiritual
evils caused by this den of spiritual thieves which ends up imputing to
Us evil while totally ignoring the actual evils the den of spiritual thieves
of the Vatican 2 church, under the personal leadership of pope JP-2 have
done!
On the contrary, We are simply imitating Jesus
Christ Who in Just Anger took Holy Action, through Holy Zeal, against the
den of thieves of His day! Because such people are lukewarm, they
are ignorant of what true Holy Zeal really is! In this way, after
imputing to Us the gross evil of the den of spiritual thieves, they then
accuse and castigate Us for having the negative "bitter zeal", which charge
is contrary to the truth. Sadly, they are in darkness because they
love not the truth and have been condemned by God to believe lies and errors
so that they end up by calling the evil which the den of spiritual thieves
do something "good" and the good We try to do, by the Grace of God, in
warning them and in educating them about the evils which the den of spiritual
thieves do as something which is "evil"!
But, “Woe to you that call evil good, and good
evil: that put darkness for light, and light for darkness: that put bitter
for sweet, and sweet for bitter. Woe to you that are wise in your
own eyes, and prudent in your own conceits” (Isaias
5:20-21).
These false judges have come to this sorry
state because, while professing themselves to be lovers of the truth, God,
Who reads their thoughts, intentions and their souls, has condemned them
to believe the evil errors of the den of spiritual thieves in the Vatican
2 church, as God the Holy Ghost warns them through the pen of Saint Paul:
"...because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be
saved. Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe
lying: That all may be judged who have not believed the truth"
(2
Thessalonians 2:10-11). In this way does God Himself judge these
false judges!
"God is NOT in the punishment
business!"
Dogma of the New Church of Secular
Humanism, the Vatican 2 church
Taught in Vatican 2 churches
in the United States During "Sermons", etc.!
Today the Modernist heretics in the Vatican
2 church of Secular Humanism, the new-world religion "church" for the
"new-world order" fanatics, are going around teaching the heresy: "God
is NOT in the punishment business!" This heresy is backed up by the pope
of the Vatican 2 church, John-Paul 2, who teaches that there is no Heaven
and there is no Hell in the Catholic Traditional sense!
So, using a dogma of Secular Humanism, if it
feels good, do it-along with the millions of other secular humanists and
Modernists! This pernicious heresy of Modernism has undoubtedly already
dragged millions and millions and millions of souls into Hell by the Vatican
2 church den of spiritual thieves! In both the Old and New Testaments
there are many examples of the Anger of God, called the Wrath of God!
Let no one confuse the Anger or Wrath of God with the capital sin of anger
or hatred because God's Anger/Hatred comes from the virtue of Justice!
Here is but one of many examples of the Anger/Wrath
of Almighty God: "And the Angel thrust in his sharp sickle into the
earth, and gathered the vineyard of the earth, and cast it into the great
press of the Wrath of God: And the press was trodden
without the city, and blood came out of the press, up to the horses' bridles,
for a thousand and six hundred furlongs"
(Apocalypse 14:19-20).
NON LICET
Therefore, despite the very real threat
of derisions, calumnies, detractions, vilifications, etc. against Us,
We can NOT sit on Our hands and do nothing under these circumstances! Our
duty is to cry out: NON LICET to the Vatican 2 pope and his followers!
By the most Holy Will and Grace of God, We humbly try to imitate Jesus
Christ, Who "hath done all things well"[Mark
7:37], by not only warning the spiritual victims about the den
of spiritual thieves headquartered in the Vatican, a.k.a. the Vatican 2
church (N.B. The homosexual - pedophile bishops and priests are but
the tip of the spiritual thievery of the Vatican 2 church and its popes.),
but, in true charity, warning the spiritual thieves themselves!
Holy Zeal seems to be so misunderstood today
that We offer just a few Scripture passages as examples.
"But be zealous for the better gifts. And I
shew unto you yet a more excellent way" (1
Corinthians 13:31).
"Follow after charity, be zealous for spiritual
gifts" (1 Corinthians 14:1).
"Wherefore, brethren, be zealous to prophesy"
(1
Corinthians 14:39).
"But be zealous for that which is good"
(Galatians
4:18).
"And who is he that can hurt you, if you be
zealous of good?" (1 Peter 3:13).
"Such as I love, I rebuke and chastise.
Be zealous therefore, and do penance" (Apocalypse 3:19).
Another excellent example of a Holy Zeal is
the Apostles. On that first Pentecost Sunday God the Holy Ghost descended
upon them in the visible form of tongues of fire! This fire represents
not only a burning love for God, but also a purified spiritual zeal for
the Greater Honor and Glory of God and the Salvation of Souls. The
Apostles, who had been filled with so much fear that they ran away from
Christ on that first Good Friday, even to the point of betrayal by Peter
the previous night because of his fears, now no longer had any fear and
their minds were clear of all confusion! Filled with God the Holy
Ghost and burning with flames of the fire of Divine Love and the fire of
a Holy Zeal for the Greater Honor and Glory of God and the Salvation of
Souls, the Apostles went forth to convert the world to Christ! Again,
this was not "bitter zeal" but a Holy Zeal!
This is at least in part what Christ meant
when He spoke of casting "fire" on the earth: "I am come to cast
fire on the earth; and what will I, but that it be kindled?" (Luke
11:49). Christ desired to cast the "fire" of the Love of God
and a Holy Zeal for the Greater Honor and Glory of God and the Salvation
of Souls on the earth through the preaching and teaching of the Apostles
who would soon receive the fire of God the Holy Ghost which would fire
them up, as the expression goes, making them fearless in the face of all
dangers and even of death itself, as proven in the lives of the Apostles!
In his well-researched classical work on the
Spiritual Life, one author, in writing about the Illuminative Way of Proficients,
says in part: "To show what charity should normally be in the illuminative
way of proficients, we shall discuss the zeal which every Christian, especially
the priest and religious, should have for the glory of God and the salvation
of souls. If this zeal is lacking, or does not exist in the degree
that it should manifestly have, it is an additional and at times striking
sign of what our love of God and souls should normally be, of what
the living, profound, radiating knowledge of the things of God should also
be in us. Those whose duty it is spiritually to feed others, themselves
need a substantial daily food, that to be had every day in intimate participation
in the Sacrifice of the Mass, in Communion, and in prayer."
"We have seen that love of neighbor is the
extension or the radiation of the love we should have for God: this
love should extend to the children of God. It is one and
the same supernatural theological love; it is essentially divine, like
grace, a participation in the inner life of God. This love
should become so ardent in a fervent Christian soul as to merit the name
of zeal.Especially for a soul consecrated to God, it
is a duty to have zeal for His glory and the salvation of one's neighbor"
(Rev.
R. Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P., THE THREE AGES OF THE INTERIOR LIFE, Prelude
of Eternal Life, Volume Two, Part III, The Illuminative Way of Proficients,
Chapter XXI, Zeal for the Glory of God and the Salvation of Souls, p. 213.
B. Herder Book Co., 1948; emphasis added).
Thus a Holy Zeal is really Charity, namely
love for God and love for the children of God. But as Charity, it
is not some "ooey-gooey" warm feeling of the concupiscent sense appetite
of man, but rather a purified, elevated, supernaturalized positive act
of the Theological Virtue of Charity. In other words, Charity is
not a feeling of any kind, nor is it an emotion of any kind, but rather
it is the exercise of the Theological Virtue of Charity which is simply
part of the normal way of living a real Spiritual Life.
He also writes in part that "Zeal
is the ardor of love, but of a spiritual love of the will, which is
at time proportionately more generous and meritorious as it is less felt"
(Rev.
R. Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P., THE THREE AGES OF THE INTERIOR LIFE, Prelude
of Eternal Life, Volume Two, Part III, The Illuminative Way of Proficients,
Chapter XXI, Zeal for the Glory of God and the Salvation of Souls, p. 214.
B. Herder Book Co., 1948; emphasis added).
On this subject the Angelic Doctor writes in
part: "Dionysius says (Div. Nom. iv): 'God is said to be a zealot, on account
of his great love for all things.' I answer that, Zeal, whatever
way we take it, arises from the intensity of love. For it is evident
that the more intensely a power tends to anything, the more vigorously
it withstands opposition or resistance. Since therefore love is 'a movement
towards the object loved,' as Augustine says (QQ. 83, qu. 35), an intense
love seeks to remove everything that opposes it. But this happens
in different ways according to love of concupiscence, and love of friendship.
For in love of concupiscence he who desires something intensely, is moved
against all that hinders his gaining or quietly enjoying the object of
his love. It is thus that husbands are said to be jealous of their wives,
lest association with others prove a hindrance to their exclusive individual
rights. In like manner those who seek to excel, are moved against those
who seem to excel, as though these were a hindrance to their excelling.
And this is the zeal of envy, of which it is written (Ps. 36:1):
'Be not emulous of evil doers, nor envy them that work iniquity.'"
"On the other hand, love of friendship seeks
the friend's good: wherefore, when it is intense, it causes a man to be
moved against everything that opposes the friend's good. In this respect,
a man is said to be zealous on behalf of his friend, when he makes a point
of repelling whatever may be said or done against the friend's good. In
this way, too, a man is said to be zealous on God's behalf, when he endeavors,
to the best of his means, to repel whatever is contrary to the honor or
will of God; according to 3 Kgs. 19:14: "With zeal I have been zealous
for the Lord of hosts." Again on the words of Jn. 2:17: "The zeal of Thy
house hath eaten me up," a gloss says that "a man is eaten up with a
good
zeal, who strives to remedy whatever evil he perceives; and
if he cannot, bears with it and laments it" (Saint
Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d.
1274 A.D. in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, SUMMA THEOLOGICA
I-II, 28, 4; emphasis added).
Zeal is the Ardor of Charity
"The first motive of zeal is that God
deserves to be loved above all things...The scond motive of zeal is
that we should imitate our Lord Jesus Christ. The
predominant virtue of the Savior is zeal, the ardor of charity,
as He Himself says: 'I am come to cast fire [of charity/zeal] on
the earth: and what will I, but that it be kindled?' (Luke
12:49)." (Rev. R. Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P., THE THREE AGES OF THE INTERIOR
LIFE, Prelude of Eternal Life, Volume Two, Part III, The Illuminative Way
of Proficients, Chapter XXI, Zeal for the Glory of God and the Salvation
of Souls, pp. 214-215. B. Herder Book Co., 1948; emphasis added).
Since this should be self-explanatory, We continue
to quote: "This thirst for the glory of God and the salvation
of souls was the great cause of the sorrow which the Savior experienced
at the sight of the sins of men. It was also the cause of Mary's
suffering at the foot of the cross."
"...A third motive for our zeal is precisely
the value of the immortal souls redeemed by the blood of Christ.
Each of them is worth more than the entire physical universe, and each
is called to receive the benefits of the redemption and eternal life."
"...Zeal led the Apostles even to martyrdom,
and for three centuries after them the same was true of many Bishops, Priests,
and Laymen of every rank and age. The martyrs, whose heroism
gave rise to numerous conversions, had such eminent zeal for the glory
of God and the salvation of souls that it became an undeniable proof of
the sanctity of the [Catholic] Church."
"...Lastly, a fourth motive of our zeal
is the contrary zeal with which the enemies of the Church toil at works
of disorder, corruption, and death. What should draw us out of
our somnolence, is the impious, spiteful, Satanic war waged against
Our Lord and Our Holy Mother the [Catholic] Church,
a war surpassing
all others, a war of the spirit, which is carried on in the
innermost depths of hearts, even in the souls of little children,
whom they desire to snatch from Our Lord that they may make them reprobates
and atheists. This war is indescribably perverse like the sins
of the spirit; it is loaded down with crushing responsibilites. The
Church sees the formidable consequences of this struggle on those who are
intent upon it; it continues to pray for them, that God may cure their
blindness and halt them on the road of damnation, into which they are dragging
so many others with them."
"The principlal motives of [Holy]
zeal are consequently: the glory of God, the imitation of Our Lord,
the salvation of souls, and the relief of the Souls in Purgatory"(Rev.
R. Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P., THE THREE AGES OF THE INTERIOR LIFE, Prelude
of Eternal Life, Volume Two, Part III, The Illuminative Way of Proficients,
Chapter XXI, Zeal for the Glory of God and the Salvation of Souls, pp.
216-218. B. Herder Book Co., 1948; emphasis added).
Finally, "it is clear that
this zeal should exist, that too often it is lacking, and that it is in
the normal way of sanctity" (Rev.
R. Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P., THE THREE AGES OF THE INTERIOR LIFE, Prelude
of Eternal Life, Volume Two, Part III, The Illuminative Way of Proficients,
Chapter XXI, Zeal for the Glory of God and the Salvation of Souls, p. 221.
B. Herder Book Co., 1948; emphasis added).
Everyone who has validly received the Holy
Sacrament of Confirmation according to the Catholic Traditinal Rite for
this Sacrament, is a soldier of Jesus Christ and, as such, should be burning
with a Holy Zeal for the Greater Honor and Glory of God in the imitation
of Jesus Christ and for the Salvation of Immortal Souls and the relief
of the Poor, Suffering Souls in Purgatory!
Retarded Souls
Within the context of Holy Zeal, We must now
examine how it is that certain others, who are spiritually tepid and/or
spiritually slothful and lazy, suffering from acute acedia which, when
accentuated, leads to malice, rancor, pusillanimity, discouragement, depression,
sluggishness, and dissipation of spirit in regard to forbidden things,
do not have a Holy Zeal and thus do not seem either to esteem it and/or
to desire it, or who put no value upon it and instead deride it!
We now make them aware that "spiritual pride
manifests itself quite frequently when spiritual gluttony or some other
self-seeking is satisfied, when things go as one wishes; then a man boasts
of his perfection,
judges others severely, sets himself up as a
master, while he is still only a poor disciple. This spiritual pride,
says St. John of the Cross, leads beginners to flee masters who do not
approve of their spirit; 'they even end by bearing them rancor'" (Rev.
R. Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P., THE THREE AGES OF THE INTERIOR LIFE, Prelude
of Eternal Life, Volume Two, Part III, The Illuminative Way of Proficients,
Chapter IV, The Passive Purification of the Senses and the Entrance into
the Illuminative Way, p. 41. B. Herder Book Co., 1948; emphasis added).
Sad to say, some people have exhibited in one
or various ways that they are, or cetainly seem to give the impression
that they are, tepid, luke-warm and perhaps even retarded souls because
they seem steeped in the exercise of derision, especially their derision
of Holy Zeal which they sluff off as of no account to them or anyone else!
This derision has even been directed at Us
from time to time over many years, beginning shortly after the New Mass
was foisted upon an ignorant Laity in 1969! In this process, such
deriders somehow feel "justified" to severely "judge" Us, not just concerning
Our ecclesiastical Office, but transpose such a judgemental derision, without
distinction, even into my personal life.
Such a juxtaposed manufacturing process attempts
to fabricate a fantasy which they label "truth", based upon one or more
misapprehensions of their own, e.g. they mistake Holy Zeal for "bitter
zeal", just anger/hatred for the capital sin of anger/hatred which is unjust,
and, which for purposes not totally obvious, possibly for some imagined
wrong against them or for some issue which they misperceive to be detrimental
to them in some personal way, which has nothing to do with ecclesiastical
matters, they must then spin their misapparehensions to such an extent
that they end up confusing themselves while their self-proclaimed powers
of discernment exaggerate and disembowel the truth to such an extent that
their rash actions become spiritually dangerous to themselves and others,
regarding which We would remind them of the punishment for this lust for
unjust vengeance against Us, which God visited upon Bishop M. the last
few years of his life, not because I, personally, am so "holy" or a "living
saint", because, on the contrary, I am but dust and ashes and nothingness
itself, or rather less than nothingness because of my many mountains of
sins, but rather because of Our God-given Offices which were disrespected
and otherwise attacked and eschewed, whether through pride, jealousy or
whatever-only God knows!
So, to you, We beg you, praying
that you please not go down the same path of Bishop M.!
What are Retarded Souls?
"Some souls, because of their
negligence or spiritual sloth, do not pass from the age of beginners
to that of proficients. These are retarded souls;
in the Spiritual Life they are like abnormal children, who do not happily
pass through the crisis of adolescence and who, though they do not remain
children, never reach the full development of maturity. Thus these
retarded souls belong neither among beginners nor among proficients. Unfortunately
they are numerous" (Rev.
R. Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P., THE THREE AGES OF THE INTERIOR LIFE, Prelude
of Eternal Life, Volume One, Part II, The Purification of the Soul in Beginners,
Chapter XXXVII, Retarded Souls, p. 461. B. Herder Book Co., 1948;
emphasis added).
"How did these souls reach this state of tepidity?
As a rule,
two principal causes are indicated: the neglect of
little things in the service of God and the refusal to make the
sacrifices He asks"
(Rev. R. Garrigou-Lagrange,
O.P., THE THREE AGES OF THE INTERIOR LIFE, Prelude of Eternal Life, Volume
One, Part II, The Purification of the Soul in Beginners, Chapter XXXVII,
Retarded Souls, p. 461. B. Herder Book Co., 1948; emphasis added).
"In the service of God, things which seem small
in themselves are great in their relation to our last end, to God Who should
be loved above all else. They are also great by reason of the supernatural
spirit of faith, confidence, and love which should make us accomplish them.
If we acted thus, we would live from morning to night in the presence of
God, which is infinitely precious; and we would live by Him, by His spirit,
instead of living by the natural spirit in accordance with the inclination
of egoism. Little by little there would grow up in us zeal for the
glory of God and the salvation of souls. Unless we strive in this
way, we may end by following the downward path of practical naturalism,
allowing ourselves to be dominated by the more or less unconscious gross
selfishness which inspires many of our acts".
"The neglect of little things in the service
of God leads rapidly to neglect of great things; for example, in the case
of a Priest or Religious, it leads to the recitation of the Office without
true piety, to scarcely any preparation for Mass, to saying Mass hastily
or assisting at it without the requisite attention, to replacing thanksgiving
by the obligatory recitation of a part of the Office, so that all personal
piety disappears and gradually gives place to piety that is, in a way,
official and exterior. If a Priest were to follow this downward path,
he would little by little become a mere functionary of God. He would
end by treating holy things with carelessness, whereas, on the other hand,
he would perhaps acquit himself with the utmost seriousness in those duties
which assure his reputation as a professor, writer, lecturer, or man of
affairs. Gradually emphasis would be shifted from what is of greatest
moment in life to what is secondary. The Holy Sacrifice of the
Mass, which perpetuates in substance on our altars the Sacrifice of the
Cross and applies its fruits to us, is evidently the most serious and greatest
thing in life for the Priest and the true Christian. A Mass well
celebrated or well heard with a spirit of faith is far superior to our
personal activity; it orientates this activity towards its true supernatural
end and renders it fruitful. On the contrary, we swerve from this
end when we reach the stage of seeking self in our activity, to the point
of forgetting the salvation of souls and all that it demands on our part.
Neglect of little things in the service of God may lead us to this forgetfulness,
which renders everything unfruitful" (Rev. R. Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P.,
THE THREE AGES OF THE INTERIOR LIFE, Prelude of Eternal Life, Volume One,
Part II, The Purification of the Soul in Beginners, Chapter XXXVII, Retarded
Souls, pp. 462-463. B. Herder Book Co., 1948; emphasis added).
"Whoever is daily faithful to the smallest
duties of Christian life, or to those of the Religious life, will receive
the grace to be faithful even to martyrdom, if he should have to bear witness
to God in his blood. (Cf. Luke 16:10; Matt. 25:23)".
"A second cause of tepidity in retarded souls
is the refusal to make the sacrifices which the Lords. Some persons
feel themselves called to a more serious, a more perfect life, to true
prayer, to the practice of humility, without which there are no true virtues;
but these souls refuse, if not directly at least indirectly, by seeking
diversion. They do not wish to hear the words that recur daily in
the invitatory of Matins: "Today, if you shall hear His voice, harden
not your hearts." Some, who are preoccupied with doing something,
for example, a book, a work that would let the world know they exist, say
to themselves from time to time: "First of all, it is essential to
become an interior soul; if the soul is empty, it can give nothing.
To do something exterior is unprofitable unless the soul is united to God."
To become an interior soul, only some sacrifices of self-love would be
necessary; God would have to be truly sought instead of self. Without
these sacrifices, how can anyone enter on a true interior life? If
these sacrifices are refused, the souls remains retarded; it may stay so
permanently" (Rev. R. Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P., THE THREE AGES OF THE
INTERIOR LIFE, Prelude of Eternal Life, Volume One, Part II, The Purification
of the Soul in Beginners, Chapter XXXVII, Retarded Souls, p. 463.
B. Herder Book Co., 1948; emphasis added).
"Then it [a retarded soul] loses zeal for
the glory of God and the salvation of its neighbor, the fervor of charity.
It falls into tepidity, which, with habitual negligence, is affection for
venial sin or the disposition of the will to commit certain venial sins
deliberately when the occasion presents itself. There is finally,
as it were, the firm resolution to remain in this state"
(Rev. R. Garrigou-Lagrange,
O.P., THE THREE AGES OF THE INTERIOR LIFE, Prelude of Eternal Life, Volume
One, Part II, The Purification of the Soul in Beginners, Chapter XXXVII,
Retarded Souls, pp. 463-464. B. Herder Book Co., 1948; emphasis added).
"Among the causes of tepidity in retarded souls,the
tendency to derision should be particularly noted"(Rev.
R. Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P., THE THREE AGES OF THE INTERIOR LIFE, Prelude
of Eternal Life, Volume One, Part II, The Purification of the Soul in Beginners,
Chapter XXXVII, Retarded Souls, p. 464. B. Herder Book Co., 1948;
emphasis added).
"The derider is himself a retarded
soul, holding others back and becoming, often without being aware of it,
the instrument of the spirit of evil" (Rev.
R. Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P., THE THREE AGES OF THE INTERIOR LIFE, Prelude
of Eternal Life, Volume One, Part II, The Purification of the Soul in Beginners,
Chapter XXXVII, Retarded Souls, pp. 464-465. B. Herder Book Co.,
1948; emphasis added).
"The derider...ridicules the just man who tends truly
to perfection; he emphasizes the latter's defects and depreciates his good
qualities. Why is this? Because he feels that he himself
has little virtue, and he is unwilling to admit his inferiority.
Then, out of spite, he lessens the real and fundamental value of his neighbor
and the necessity of virtue itself. He may greatly harm weak souls
which he intimidates, and, while working his own ruin, he may labor at
their perdition" (Rev. R. Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P., THE THREE AGES OF
THE INTERIOR LIFE, Prelude of Eternal Life, Volume One, Part II, The Purification
of the Soul in Beginners, Chapter XXXVII, Retarded Souls, p. 465.
B. Herder Book Co., 1948; emphasis added).
"In this discussion of retarded souls, a most important consideration
should be noted: namely, that we must be on the alert to
preserve in our souls the subordination of the natural activity of the
mind to the essentially supernatural virtues, especially to the three theological
virtues. These three infused virtues and their acts are certainly
very superior to the natural activity of the mind necessary for the study
of the sciences, of philosophy, and of theology. To deny this truth
would be a heresy; but it is not sufficient to admit it in theory.
Otherwise we would end by really preferring the prayer, to the love of
God and of souls, to the celebration of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass,
which would be hurriedly celebrated without any spirit of faith, in order
to give more time to a piece of work, to an intellectual overloading that
would remain quite empty and fruitless, because it would be destitute of
the spirit that ought to animate it. Thus we would fall into an evil
intellectualism in which there would be something like the hypertrophy
of the reasoning powers to the detriment of the life of faith, of true
piety, and of the indispensable training of the will. Then charity,
the highest of the theological virtues, would no longer truly hold the
first place in the soul, which might remain forever retarded and in part
fruitless" (Rev. R. Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P., THE THREE AGES OF THE
INTERIOR LIFE, Prelude of Eternal Life, Volume One, Part II, The Purification
of the Soul in Beginners, Chapter XXXVII, Retarded Souls, p. 467.
B. Herder Book Co., 1948; emphasis added).
In the final analysis, there
are a number of reasons why the Vatican 2 church has been so successful,
not only with its strong appeal of rebellion to anything remotely "Catholic"
which has found kindred spirits in so many of its cardinals, bishops, priests,
minor clergy and religious who seem to have eagerly embraced its heretical
Modernism, especially some of its rotten fruits such as the modernized
and otherwise updated 16th Century Protestant Supper Memorial Meal, a.k.a.
the "New Mass", a.k.a. the "Novus Ordo Missae" which has invalidated its
illicit and illegal liturgical "mass rite", the invalidization of its illicit
and illegal liturgical "sacrament rites", and its heretical catechism,
who comprise a relatively small minority, but also with many of the vast
majority of its membership, namely the laity, many of whom have been victimized
in a variety of ways.
These reasons include, but are
not limited to, such things as sincere people who are ignorant of the truth,
others who are not so sincere but who prefer to remain in their ignorance
because they fear that what We tell them is the truth, and still others
who are spiritually tepid, lazy or retarded souls. To these We must
also add, as with have regarding so many of the clergy of the Vatican 2
church as exampled above, a lust for change, innovation within the context
of the heresy of Modernism, the heresy which has been taught to them by
their Modernist clergy, beginning with their "pope" and working downwards
to the local "president of the assembly", a.k.a. dinner-host at the modernized
and otherwise updated 16th Century Protestant Supper Memorial Meal, a.k.a.
the "New Mass", a.k.a. the "Novus Ordo Missae" some victimized souls still
label a "mass", along with an outright rejection of any and all things
truly "Catholic" within the context of the Authentic Apostolic Tradition.
It is no wonder that with so
many of his laity, who have been deliberately zombicized on various levels
with the spiritual virus of heresy, schism and apostasy from the Roman
Catholic Church, and who otherwise have been spiritually, intellectually
and emotionally victimized and/or paralyzed, plus the new revelations of
numbers, growing every day it seems, of victims who have been physically
and sexually molested by unknown numbers of his bishops and priests, that
yet the pope of the Vatican 2 church does whatever he wants to do with
total impunity and with not even the shadow of any fear of giving any account
to anyone -
but We would charitably remind the pope of the Vatican 2 church
that this is only in this life and then only for a limited time, what with
the current scandals of his egregious homosexual -pedophile bishops and
priests bringing long overdue judgment to themselves in particular and
to the heretical teachings, the practices and the official and unofficial
policies of the Vatican 2 church in general which, if it continues, will
cause the selling off of many properties (church buildings, school buildings,
monasteries, convents, etc.) to pay for the billions of dollars which secular
courts will fine the Vatican 2 church on the local level, especially here
in the United States of America, perhaps even leaving the Vatican 2 church
laity churchless and schooless in some places in view of the historical
fact that already many church and school buildings either have been sold,
usually to other Protestants, or demolished, so that the remnant Roman
Catholics can not buy them and restore them to their pre-Vatican 2 integrity
with VALID liturgical Rites for the Mass and the Seven Sacraments and the
preaching and teaching of the RomanCatholic Faith!
More Letters
Now that We have concluded the subject of False
Judges, We return to the subject of the letters which We have sent to the
Vatican 2 popes. What We mentioned about Our PRIVATE letter to Paul
6 can also be said for Our PRIVATE letter to pope John-Paul 1, Albano Luciani
[Saturday, August 26, 1978 - Thursday, September 28, 1978].
Also, regarding JP-1, it was reported in the
news media that he died while reading some correspondence. Some of
Our associates, who knew of Our Letter to JP-1, told Us that JP-1 was reading
Our letter to him and that while reading it was so overcome with the Truths
We presented in Our NON LICET letter, that he went into shock and died!
Of course there is no proof for this assumption. Most probably, all
of Our letters which reach the Vatican are immediately shredded, lest anyone
read them and be converted from the errors of their ways!?
Unfortunately, Our previous Letters to JP-2
over the years, beginning with Our PRIVATE Letter to him of Tuesday, October
17, 1978 (the day after he was elected the pope of the Vatican 2 church),
have had no effect. Again, most probably these letters, e.g. of July
5, 1993, never reached his desk, but were also shredded?
We have observed that every year the Vatican
2 church pope, John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - present],
continues to attack the Catholic Faith and to deceive more millions of
people. In view of this, it becomes necessary to go PUBLIC so that,
even if he chooses to continue to ignore what We write, at least the victims
of his anti-Catholic actions, including his anti-Catholic teachings, will
become aware of the fact that they have been victimized, and not just by
his homosexual - pedophile bishops and priests either! The
pope himself is the problem! No more excuses for the anti-Catholic
and now even a blatant PAGAN behavior of this Vatican 2 church pope, John-Paul
2 [notice, We do NOT say of Karol Wyotya the man]!
NON LICET!
This explains why, in True Charity, We also
say NON LICET to all of the cardinals, bishops, priests and other clergy
of the Vatican 2 church who either approve of these anti-Catholic actions
of all of the Vatican 2 popes, or who have done one or more of these same
things themselves!
This explains why, in True Charity, We also
address the Religious and Laity who have been victimized by the Vatican
2 popes, cardinals, bishops and/or priests, that sadly, it is Our duty
to inform you that in point of truth and fact, you have been victimized
and, also, in True Charity, to warn each and everyone of you that it is
NON LICET to continue to go to any Vatican 2 church or, for this same reason,
to go to the modernized and otherwise updated 16th Century Protestant Supper
Memorial Meal, a.k.a. the "New Mass", a.k.a. the "Novus Ordo Missae" in
ANY language, even in Latin, or to receive any of the seven sacraments
of the Vatican 2 church or of any other de facto Protestant church!
Let us Consider the Latest Group
of Victims, a.k.a. Casualties,
Whom We Must Now Advise and
Warn with NON LICIT
Many of you probably
heard on the radio or saw on television various sound bytes of John-Paul
2 on his recent public relations blitz to Canada, Guatemala
and Mexico in an apparent attempt to counteract the ocean of negative news
regarding his homosexual - pedophile priests and bishops.
For many years,
JP-2 (Yes, even he calls himself JP-2!) has brought his own agenda, a.k.a.
missionary program, with him on his many trips which this missionary of
a return to the primitive cultures of the people he visits should be encouraged
to return to the ways of their ancestors!
For example, one
newspaper ran a photo with the caption: "pope:
Voodoo has its place".
The photo showed JP-2 speaking with a native-costumed
Brazilian Indian during his 12 day tour of Brazil in 1980. Earlier, JP-2
had said that instead of condemning such popular beliefs, "it is necessary
to cultivate and use popular religiosity for the better evangelization
of people. It is important not to look down upon it nor to laugh at it".
(From the Rockford Register Star, Rockford, Illinois, Saturday, July 12,
1980.)
We ask: HOW can a return to a primitive
pagan religion lead to "the better evangelization of people"? This
Modernist heretical teaching is not isolated to just this one incident.
Rather, on his recent blitz to three countries of the Americas, JP-2 again
encouraged everyone to respect of the rights of "indigenous people", whatever
that cleverly worded ambiguous statement really means! Did his sweeping
generalized gratuitous statement include the Aztec indians of Mexico?
This happened when JP-2 did the NOR (Novus Ordo Rite, the modernized and
otherwise updated 16th Century Protestant Supper Memorial Meal, a.k.a.
the "New Mass", a.k.a. the "Novus Ordo Missae" some people still think
is a "mass"!). This was during the "canonization" of Pedro De San
Jose de Betancourt of Guatemala, a 17th-century Spanish missionary of the
Roman Catholic Church. This "circus" happened in Guatemala City,
Tuesday, July 30 2002.
During the NOR, JP-2 called upon society to
respect of the rights of "indigenous people". But, does this also
mean the religious rights of said "indigenous people"? Who
were these said "indigenous people" who were converted to the Roman Catholic
Faith by the missionary, Father De San Jose de Betancourt? They were
pagans! The irony here is that in one hour the pagan missionary,
JP-2, undid the work of the entire lifetime of the Roman Catholic missionary,
Father de Betancourt! What a slap in the face to this Roman Catholic
missionary Priest whom the pagan missionary JP-2 had the audacity to claim
he "canonized"!
It is past time for the "conservative"
element in the Vatican 2 church to take off their blinders and to stop
making excuses for the actions of this pagan pope, John-Paul 2, who is
part of the problem-apparently the leader of the problem! He is certainly
NOT part of the solution! Just looking at the photos of the actions
of JP-2 in this edition of Catholic
should
prove Our position for those who sincerely love the truth!
Truth
Remember the teaching of one of the Fathers
of the Catholic Church concerning truth: "Not only does he betray
the truth who transgresses against the truth by openly speaking falsehood
and not the truth, but he also betrays it who does not openly speak the
truth, which must be openly proclaimed, or does not boldly defend it when
it must be boldly defended"
(Saint John Chrysostom [b. Antioch c. 347
A.D. - d. Comana, Pontus 407 A.D.], Patriarch of Constantinople, Father
and Doctor of the Catholic Church, Cause 11, Question 3, NOLITE).
An even more famous Father of the Catholic
Church writes that "anyone who conceals the truth for fear of some authority
calls down the wrath of God upon himself, because he fears men more than
God...Both are guilty: he who conceals the truth and he who speaks
falsehood, because the former does not wish to make the truth known and
the latter desires not to refute it" (Saint Augustine [b. Tagaste,
Africa 354 A.D. - d. Hippo, Regia, Africa 430 A.D.], Bishop of Hippo Regia,
Doctor of the Catholic Church, AD CASULANUS, Cause xi, question 3, Quisquis).
The Angelic Doctor teaches that "Truth knows
no distinction of persons. Therefore, he who speaks the truth is
invincible, dispute with whom he may" (Saint Thomas Aquinas,
O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. 1274 A.D. in Fossa
Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, COMMENTARY ON JOB, Chapter 13, Lesson
2).
The Modernist heretics of today have brainwashed
millions and millions of people into thinking that "opinion", especially
"public opinion", is much more preferable than the Truth, or worse, that
such "opinion" is truth! Now Truth is the object of the intellect,
a power of the soul, just as Good is the object of the will, the other
power of the soul. From this it should be clear that "opinions" may
or may not contain truth, but "opinion" per se is not the proper
object of either the intellect or the will. Because this error of
"opinion" is so widely disseminated, taught and believed by the Modernists
and their apparently hundreds of millions of innocent victims, please prayerfully
consider the following exposition of "opinion".
"1. Opinions replace truth.
In this world the first and fundamental doctrine
of power consists of an affirmation that there is no truth. Saint
Augustine said that the difference between the city of this world and the
City of God consists of the former having a thousand opinions, while the
latter has only one truth. The basic difference between both cities,
therefore, is not based on the content, but on the very existence of truth.
It suffices to remember the dramatic dialogue between Jesus and Pilate.
What is most grave is that there is a technique
to replace truth by opinions. This technique exists and is very useful.
It suffices to look at present religious, literary, and philosophical productions.
Opinions can be so cautiously expressed that it is impossible to get to
know what the author's thesis is, or even more paradoxical, doctrines that
are mutually contradictory are juxtaposed as if they were consistent.
Let us look at the words: `God is dead.'
If the slogan were denial everybody would be able to understand.
However, here we have a subtly sophisticated idea through which `theologians'
want to convey the deceitful impression that they are preserving the most
assayed and chemically pure idea of God...through its `identification'
with the most profound reality of man.
Even the ambiguous terms `conservative' and `progressive'
[i.e. liberal] conceal the relativistic technique [quasi-Newspeak, etc.],
which leads every doctrinal issue in the direction of right wing and left
wing. Thus everything becomes relative; everything becomes a matter
of opinions and an instrument of power. Relativity of truth and doctrine
is the actual goal of these arbitrary developments of the Church's present
problems. Is not this measure, proclaimed even by bishops and cardinals
among Us, absurd and most unjust, as if it were an ideal to place us halfway
between truth and error?
2. Is Gnosis Reappearing?
[Note: The Cardinal prefers the term Gnosis
instead of
Modernism or the Protestantization of the Church because
these things are the modern-day version of Gnosticism.] Let it be
remembered that Gnosis, with its appeal to science and higher speculation,
with its eagerness to understand mystery and to naturalize the Faith, was,
during the second century, perhaps the worst danger in all the history
of the Church. I believe that the complex of errors circulating today
can be called Gnosis, systematically speaking. But....do many people
know what they are talking about? This is terrible, but they do not!
One does not act on rational grounds, but on one's
excessive desire to adapt oneself to the world [The heresy of Modernism.].
Worldly power, however, has its own philosophy, and fashionable [Modernist]
theologians translate fashionable opinions into [heretical Modernist] theological
language, not because they accept a doctrine as such, but because they
accept these doctrines that flatter the powers of this world.
The present times are grave, not because it is
not longer a question of opposition or contrast between truth and error,
but between truth and non-truth, between the order of truth and the dictatorship
of public opinion. PEOPLE BELIEVE THEY ARE FREE BECAUSE THIS APPEARS
IN JURIDICAL TESTS; AS A MATTER OF FACT, THIS DECEIVING BELIEF IS EVIDENCE
OF THEIR SERVITUDE.
Is the Church also under the despotism of public
opinion? Perhaps not the Church, but certainly many people within
the Church are. The Church could not be deprived of its freedom with
the Holy Spirit's provoking powerful reactions....
3. What is Most Urgent?
The most urgent work is to restore the distinction
between truth and error in the Church. We have reached a point where
any exercise of ecclesiastical authority is considered an abuse of freedom,
as if authority were a denial of freedom! A thousand illegitimate
powers severely and systematically curtain the conscience and liberty of
people at a superficial level, while at the deepest level they detach them
from the truth contained in the sources of revelation and the Magisterium.
I hope that just and authorized distinctions will be forthcoming.
PASTORAL AUTHORITY IS NO ART OF COMPROMISE AND CONCESSION, BUT THE ART
OF SAVING SOULS THROUGH THE TRUTH.
This truth is many times obscured by abusive liturgical
deformations. Today dangerous losses are discovered in the essential.
Not only is the Rite sacred, but also the presence in the Rite of the meaningful
reality. Once the Rite is mythologized the meaning of its contents
is lost. No wonder that the Eucharist becomes for some a mere feast
of human unity where God is just a spectator. THIS IS NO LONGER HERESY,
BUT APOSTASY.
Right. The present situation in the Church
is one of the most grave in its history, for this time the challenge does
not come from outer persecution, but from inner perversion. This
is very grave. But the gates of Hell will not prevail." (Giuseppe
Cardinal Siri, Archbishop of Genoa, Italy [born in Genoa, Italy on May
20, 1906 - died May 2, 1989]; emphasis added.)
anti-Catholic Actions of John-Paul 2
Returning now to JP-2, by his actions and subtle
and ambiguous words which are toughen couched in the language of Newspeak
(say one thing, do another) and/or in the language of the heresy of Modernism,
it seems very obvious to Us that JP-2 considers that Father de Betancourt
should NOT have converted the "indigenous people" to the Roman Catholic
Faith - he should have left them alone to practice their pagan Aztec religion!
JP-2 apparently feels that Father would have done better if he had stayed
in Spain and never engaged in any missionary activities!?
With this kind of Satanic, insane, illogical
and virulent anti-Catholic backwards philosophy, it is only one small baby-step
backwards, and perhaps but a short time, before JP-2 tries to teach the
whole world, especially the multi-victimized members of the Vatican 2 church
of which he is the "pope", the heresy of indifferentism, namely that all
religions are the same! That all religions are equally good and important
and are all different roads to his "heaven" which is not really a "place",
but rather a state - the Teilhardian black hole, a.k.a. the "omega point"
- so that it really doesn't make any difference what religion you believe
or practice - and that everyone should return to the pagan religions of
their ancestors who lived 1,000 or 2,000 or even 3,000 years ago, even
if that means religions which practiced human sacrifice as did, for example,
the Aztecs, with whom JP-2 seems to be infatuated by the looks of his facial
expressions at their re-created multi-feathered costumes, dances and exorcism!?
Does such an unbroken, indulgent reverie betoken a JP-2 who secretly fancies
himself the reincarnation of Montezuma I or Montezuma II?
Most probably in order to pay the billions
of dollars in forthcoming lawsuits, just in the U.S., from victims of his
homosexual (they are in the heart of his church per JP-2!) and/or
pedophile Vatican 2 priests and bishops, JP-2 will probably close down
all of the missionary activities of the Vatican 2 church, sell off all
of the mission property (churches, schools, etc.), plus start selling off
the valuable church property here in the U.S., which used to belong to
the Roman Catholic Church, to the highest bidder!?
Let's not forget how JP-2 prayed in public
at Assisi with non-Christians and non-Catholics on Monday, October 27,
1986! "But how can hearts be united in perfect charity where minds
do not agree in faith?" (Præclara Gratulationis Publicæ, The
Reunion of Christendom, Encyclical Letter of pope Leo XIII, Wednesday,
June 20, 1894, ¶ 20)
Here once finds public proof, by his actions,
how JP-2 accepted, for all intents and purposes, both non-Christian and
even pagan religious leaders as equals according to the Masonic goal of
a "New World Order" that necessitates the development of a "New, One-World
Religion". The leader of such one world religion would of necessity have
to be someone who accepts Masonic doctrines and authority. Apparently
the pagan-pope- missionary, JP-2 considers himself to be the leader of
the pagan "New, One-World Religion" of the Masonic "New World Order"?
In addition, as the above photo proves, the
Pagan missionary, JP-2, committed sacrilege against the Holy Picture of
Our Lady of Guadalupe for permitting a pagan ritual of exorcism
to be performed, ironically upon himself, while seated on a chair, supposedly
during the NOR, held IN HER SHRINE on Thursday, August 1, 2002!
We would publicly warn the pagan-pope-missionary
of the New-World Order and one-world religion, the professional actor,
JP-2, that he must publicly return to the Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe
where he must humbly and sincerely and contritely do public penance for
forty days, in sackcloth and ashes, before the miraculous picture of Our
Lady of Guadalupe, after which he must receive valid Absolution from a
valid Priest during a valid Sacrament of Penance, before God Himself calls
JP-2 to stand before His Judgment Seat which comes quickly and before God
destroys this Shrine because of this and other profanations, e.g. JP-2
using the Abomination of Desolation, a.k.a. the "New Mass" (NOR) there
and elsewhere!
Below you will find a few of the many of JP-2's
notorious anti-Catholic acts, forbidden to ALL Catholics along with some
other relevant data on the invalid and illegal changes to the Catholic
Traditional Rite of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.
Thank you for
taking the time from your busy schedule to read this.
God bless
you!
In the Holy
Hearts of Jesus and Mary
A Brief Review of Some Things
Regarding the Changes to the
Catholic Traditional Rite of
The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass
Introduction
The changes to the Catholic Traditional Mass came
out in the late 1960's as a result of Synod Vatican 2 held
at the Vatican in Rome, Italy from Thursday, October 11, 1962 A.D.,
to Wednesday, December 8, 1965 A.D.
But have you ever wondered IF the Roman Catholic
Church can actually ever validly and licitly CHANGE not only
her teachings on the Mass and the Seven Sacraments or even on the
Faith, but actually
validly and licitly CHANGE the liturgical
rites themselves for the Mass and the Seven Sacraments?
Have you been one of what seems to be the millions
and millions of those Roman Catholics who, through no Fault of their own,
have never had an opportunity to learn very much about the truths of the
Catholic Rite of Mass? If you are like most Roman Catholics, the
answer is most probably "No"?
But now YOU have an opportunity to learn about
some of the truths about the Catholic Mass in the privacy of your own home!
You will also learn about some specific teachings, condemnations and laws
of the Roman Catholic Church in regard either to the Mass or in regard
to making any changes to the Mass.
For example, you will learn that the "New Mass"
(Novus Ordo Missae) violates, among other things, the following: 1) Roman
Catholic Council of Trent, Session 22; 2) Quo
Primum Tempore; 3) Mediator Dei;
4) Pascendi
Dominici Gregis; and, 5) Praeclara Gratulationis
Publicae.
Also you will discover that both pope Paul
6 and pope John-Paul 2, as proven in part by some of the photos in this
edition of
Catholic,
although professing themselves to be members of the Roman Catholic Church,
have violated each of these above teachings, dogmas and/or declarations
of the Roman Catholic Church!
Furthermore, as some of the photos below prove,
both pope Paul 6 and
pope John-Paul 2, have incurred the
censure of automatic excommunication from the Roman Catholic Church
for their violations of either some or all of the following (not to mention
others which are not listed here): 1)
Roman
Catholic Council of Trent, Session 22; 2)
Quo
Primum Tempore; and, 3) Pascendi
Dominici Gregis.
Therefore, the following provisions of the
CODE OF CANON LAW
the Codex Iuris Canonici, of the Roman Catholic
Church,
which have NOT been changed by the "new laws"
of the Vatican 2 church,
took effect automatically regarding Paul 6
and JP-2:
1) Canon 2314
Canon 2314 § 1. Omnes a christiana
fide apostatae et omnes et singuli haeretici aut schismatici:
(All apostates from the Christian faith and all
heretics and schismatics:)
1°. Incurrunt ipso facto excommunicationem;
(Incur excommunication ipso facto and)
2°. Nisi moniti resipuerint, priventur
beneficio, dignitate, pensione, officio aliove munere, si quod in Ecclesia
habeant, infames declarentur, et clerici, iterata monitione, deponantur;
(Unless they repent, shall be deprived of any
benefice, dignity, pension or other charge which they may hold in the Church,
and be declared infamous; clerks, after repeated warning, shall be deposed;)
3°. Si sectae acatholicae nomen dederint
vel publice adhaeserint, ipso facto infames sunt et, firmo praescripto
Can. 188, n. 4, clerici, monitione incassum praemissa, degradentur....
(If apostates, heretics or schismatics have joined
a non-Catholic sect or publicly professed themselves members thereof, they
are by this very fact (ipso facto) infamous; and, according to the
firm prescription of Canon 188, # 4, clerics, after having been warned
without result, must be degraded and their offices thereby become vacant...)
Commentary:
Crimes Against Faith and Unity
It is quite natural that a society which claims
to be the one Church instituted by Christ, should direct its first penalty
against crimes that subvert its very foundation, i.e., divine and Catholic
faith. Belief in the divine mission and the dogmas of the Church is attacked
and shattered by apostasy, heresy, and schism, to which must be added every
suspicion uttered publicly and the denial of propositions which, though
not formally dogmas, are closely connected with the deposit of faith. Special
danger to the faith arises from the perusal of writings that attack the
Church and her teachings.
(Rev. P. Charles Augustine, O.S.B., D.D., Professor
of Canon Law, A COMMENTARY ON THE NEW CODE OF CANON LAW, Volume VIII, Book
V, Penal Code, Canon 2314, pp. 275-276; B. Herder Book Company, Imprimatur
by John J. Glennon, Archbishop of Saint Louis, Friday, August 25, 1922;
emphasis added).
2) Canon 188.4
Canon 188.4 On account of the tacit resignation
admitted by the law itself any office is vacant ipso facto and without
any declaration, if a cleric:...4. Publicly defects from the Catholic Faith.
3) Canon 1258
Canon 1258 § 1. Haud licitum est fidelibus
quovis modo active assistere seu partem habere in sacris acatholicorum.
It is unlawful for Catholics to assist actively
in any way at, or to take part in, the religious services of non-Catholics.
§ 2. Tolerari potest praesentia, passiva
seu materialis, civilis officii, vel honoris causa, ob graven rationem
ab Episcopo in casu dubii probandam, in acatgholicorum funeribus, nuptiis
similibusque sollemniis, dummodo perversionis et scandali periculum absit.
A passive or merely material presence may be tolerated,
for reasons of civil duty or honor, at funerals, weddings, and similar
celebrations, provided no danger of perversion or scandal arises from this
assistance. In doubtful cases the reason for assisting must be grave, and
recognized as such by the bishop.
Commentary:
This is the so-called communicatio in sacris active cum acatholicis.The
reason why the Church has always forbidden such participation in the religious
services of non-Catholics is the intimate conviction that she herself is
the only true Church of Christ.
Secondary reasons for this prohibition are: the quasi-approbation of
non-Catholic worship, which lies in a Catholic's participation therein
and which at the same time is an external profession of faith.
The other reason is scandal, which may be given to Catholics who see
the mixture of worship and the deference paid to non-Catholic ministers
and functions.
Finally there is the danger of perversion, or of gradually increasing
religious indifference when the faithful freely and indiscriminately participate
in heretical religious services.
Even the simulation of false religion is incompatible with the purity
of the Catholic faith. (S.O., Aug. 28, 1780; S.C.P.F., 1729 [Coll.
nn. 546, 311].
(Rev. P. Charles Augustine, O.S.B., D.D., Professor of Canon Law, A
COMMENTARY ON THE NEW CODE OF CANON LAW, Volume VI, Administrative Law,
Canon 1258, pp. 192-193; B. Herder Book Company, Imprimatur by John J.
Glennon, Archbishop of Saint Louis, Monday, November 22, 1920; emphasis
added).
4) Canon 2259
Canon 2259 says in part: No excommunicated
person has the right to assist at Divine Services..
5) Canon 2316
Anyone who spontaneously and with full knowledge
helps in any way in the propagation of heresy, or who co-operates in any
way with heretics contrary to the provision of Canon #1258 is suspected
of heresy.
Links to the texts of various documents,
plus eye-opening photographs, etc.
Links to the texts of various documents, etc.
Canons of the Roman Catholic Council
of Trent on the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. Issued
during the Solemn Session on Monday,
September 17, 1562 A.D.
It infallibly forbids anyone (this
would include popes) whosoever from making any changes to the Mass,
for whatever reason(s), at anytime, under the penalty of automatic excommunication.
Canons of the Roman Catholic Council of Trent
on the Sacrament of the Most Holy Eucharist. Issued during the Solemn
Session on Thursday, October 11, 1551 A.D.
If anyone (this would
include popes) denies the Roman Catholic dogmas on the Most Holy
Eucharist, e.g. Transubstantiation, they are automatically excommunicated.
Quo Primum Tempore
of the Roman Catholic
pope, Saint Pius V,
Antonio-Michele Ghislieri [Friday, January 7, 1566 - Monday, May 1, 1572],
issued on Tuesday, July 14, 1570 A.D.
It infallibly forbids changes
to the Catholic Traditional Mass under penalty of automatic excommunication.
So, guess which members of the
Vatican 2 church clergy have been automatically
excommunicated because of their use of the
modernized and otherwise updated 16th Century Protestant Supper Memorial
Meal, a.k.a. the "New Mass", a.k.a. the "Novus Ordo Missae"???!!!
Mediator Dei
of the Roman Catholic pope, Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March
2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958], on the Sacred Liturgy, issued on
Thursday, November 20, 1947.
It infallibly condemns changes
to the Catholic Traditional Rite of Mass. Therefore, in effect, it
condemns the modernized and otherwise updated
16th Century Protestant Supper Memorial Meal, a.k.a. the "New Mass", a.k.a.
the "Novus Ordo Missae"!!!
The Novus Ordo Missae modernized and updated
and otherwise made up in part by the 6 active Protestants (see photos below)
on the Consilium actually includes
some of the very things Pius
XII condemned, e.g., changing the altar into a table; excluding black as
a liturgical color; excessive archaism; getting rid of statues in churches;
etc.!
Pascendi Dominici Gregis
of the Roman Catholic pope, Saint Pius
X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914],
issued on Sunday, September 8, 1907.
It infallibly condemns the errors
of the heresies of Modernism.
Read about how future Clergy
(this includes future Priests and Bishops) were
taught errors, especially the heresy of Modernism, in the seminary-this
back before 1907 A.D.!
Please Note: Roman Catholic pope, Saint Pius X,
had already condemned some of the specific heresies of the Modernists in
the Syllabus Condemning the Errors of the Modernists, LAMENTABILI SANE,
on Thursday, July 4, 1907.
Praestantia Scripturae Sacrae
of the Roman Catholic pope, Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August
4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], issued on Monday, November
18, 1907
.
It infallibly condemns those
who would propagate rash and erroneous views in the study of the
Holy Bible. Plus, it automatically excommunicates
the Modernist heretics.
So, guess which members of the
Vatican 2 church clergy have been condemned
and automatically excommunicated!
Apostolicae Curae of the
Roman Catholic pope, Leo XIII, Gioacchino Pecci [Wednesday, February
20, 1878 - Monday, July 20, 1903], issued on Tuesday, September 15, 1896.
It infallibly declared that Anglican
Orders are Invalid.
These same Catholic traditional
principles also prove the "New Mass", the Novus Ordo Rite, is per
se invalid!
Præclara Gratulationis
Publicæ of the Roman Catholic
pope,
Leo XIII, Gioacchino Pecci [Wednesday, February 20, 1878 -
Monday, July 20, 1903], The Reunion of Christendom, issued on Wednesday,
June 20, 1894.
It infallibly explains what True
Ecumenism really is. Compare
this teaching with the False Ecumenism taught and practiced by popes
Paul 6, Giovanni Battista Montini [Friday, June 21, 1963 - Sunday, August
6, 1978], and John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - present].
The Ottaviani Intervention
The Roman Theologians on the problems with
the "New Mass", the Novus Ordo Missae. Thursday, June 5, 1969.
HOLY MASS and the Novus Ordo Missae - Is
it valid? and Agreement Between the First Protestant Reform
of 1549 in England and the Reform of Paul VI [in Rome] since Vatican II.
This study shows a great similarity between
the 16th Century Protestant Prayer Booke of Edward VI of 1549 and the "New
Mass", a.k.a. Novus Ordo Missae of 1969.
62 Reasons Why Catholics
can NOT attend the "New Mass"
What is
the Vatican
2 church?
Questioning the Validity
of the "New Mass"
Large Picture of the Holy
Sacrifice of the Mass to download.
Links to some eye-opening photographs of
"popes" of the
Vatican 2 church
Doing Things Forbidden to Roman Catholics!
pope
of the Vatican 2 church,
pope
Paul 6,
Giovanni Battista Montini
[Friday, June 21, 1963 - Sunday,
August 6, 1978]
Large photo of pope
Paul 6 with the 6 PROTESTANTS who helped to make up the
modernized and otherwise updated 16th Century Protestant Supper Memorial
Meal, a.k.a. the "New Mass", a.k.a. the "Novus Ordo Missae"
which is NOT the CATHOLIC SACRIFICE OF THE MASS! Photo taken in the
Vatican on Friday, April 10, 1970.
But how can hearts be united in perfect charity where minds do not
agree in faith? (Præclara Gratulationis Publicæ, The Reunion
of Christendom, Encyclical Letter of pope Leo XIII,
Wednesday, June 20, 1894, ¶ 20).
Various laws of the Roman Catholic Churchhave
been flagrantly broken or have been automatically activated, e.g. Canon
2314, Canon 188.4, Canon 1258, Canon 2259 and Canon 2316.
In answer to your anticipated question, NO, the Canon Law of the Roman
Catholic Church has NOT been changed! However, the "New,
One-World Religion" church of the “New World Order”,the
Vatican 2 church, HAS put out its own modernized version of
some “laws” which claims to be a “canon law”!
Also, the various laws of the Roman
Catholic Church have automatically excommunicated all those
who have broken these laws, whether knowingly or unknowingly, including
the pope of the "New, One-World Religion"
church of the “New World Order”, the Vatican 2
church, along with all of his participating cardinals, bishops
and priests, plus his religious and laity too!
These law-breakers have incurred the penalty of automatic excommunication,
whether knowingly or unknowingly, for breaking:
1)
Canon 2314 (Codex Iuris Canonici)
of the Roman Catholic Church;
2) the
Canons of the Roman
Catholic Council of Trent on the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass,
issued during the Solemn Session on Monday, September 17, 1562 A.D.;
3) the Canons of the Roman
Catholic Council of Trent on the Sacrament of the
Most Holy Eucharist, issued during the Solemn Session on Thursday,
October 11, 1551 A.D.;
4) the Quo Primum Tempore
of the Roman Catholic pope, Saint Pius
V, Antonio-Michele Ghislieri [Friday, January 7, 1566 - Monday, May 1,
1572], issued on Tuesday, July 14, 1570 A.D. for changing the Missale
Romanum and replacing it with the modernized
and otherwise updated 16th Century Protestant Supper Memorial Meal, a.k.a.
the "New Mass", a.k.a. the "Novus Ordo Missae";
5) and, Pascendi Dominici Gregis
of the Roman Catholic pope, Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August
4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], issued on Sunday, September 8, 1907
for
embracing, preaching and or teaching, by word or action, the heresy
of Modernism!
 |
Large photo of
pope Paul 6 congratulating
these allegedly 6 active PROTESTANTS!
Photo taken in the
Vatican on Friday, April 10, 1970.
But how can hearts be united in perfect charity where minds do not
agree in faith? (Præclara Gratulationis Publicæ, The Reunion
of Christendom, Encyclical Letter of pope Leo
XIII, Wednesday, June 20, 1894, ¶ 20).
“There is the danger of perversion, or of gradually
increasing religious indifference when the faithful freely and indiscriminately
participate in heretical religious services. Even the simulation
of false religion is incompatible with the purity of the Catholic faith”
(S.O., August 28, 1780; S.C.P.F., 1729 [Coll. nn. 546, 311]. |
Large photo of a
few of the thousands and thousands of "Catholic" Clergy (Priests and Bishops
of all Ranks including Cardinals and popes<
![Large photo of pope Paul 6 congratulating these allegedly 6 active PROTESTANTS! Photo taken in the Vatican on Friday, April 10, 1970. But how can hearts be united in perfect charity where minds do not agree in faith? (Præclara Gratulationis Publicæ, The Reunion of Christendom, Encyclical Letter of pope Leo XIII, Wednesday, June 20, 1894, ¶ 20). “There is the danger of perversion, or of gradually increasing religious indifference when the faithful freely and indiscriminately participate in heretical religious services. Even the simulation of false religion is incompatible with the purity of the Catholic faith” (S.O., August 28, 1780; S.C.P.F., 1729 [Coll. nn. 546, 311].](p6&cons3.jpg){kind=link}
