"The personal reaction to this speech [of Pope Paul 6] of the two Italian cardinals so doggedly opposed to the process of conciliar reform was not known; but the two cardinals in question, Siri of Genoa and Ruffini of Palermo, were seated beside the Pope (Paul 6) directly on his right and it was obvious from the Pope's tone that he expected compliance from them too. Cardinal Siri's domination of the Italian Episcopal Conference had been ended in August, but he retains the support of powerful right-wing elements and wealthy industrialists and could still cause trouble. The attitude of this group may be illustrated by an incident involving the indomitable Bishop Carli of Segni. On November 18th, during the promulgation of the document on Divine Revelation, Cardinal Ottaviani's former spokesman was seen squirming with excitement at his seat. After the end of the session, Father Balic, a Holy Office consultor, rushed up to him and said: 'Calm yourself, ECCELLENZA, NON SONO DEFINIZIONI-these texts are not technically definitions of the faith.' He was echoing a statement attributed to Cardinal Siri the week before when after a conference criticizing the work of the Council, he was asked by a priest about the value to be attributed to conciliar decisions and replied: 'NON SONO DEFINIZIONI; NONCI OBBLIGHINO MAI-they are not definitions; they will never bind us.' On December 7th, by contrast, Bishop Carli had full control of himself and between the final votes joked with the French bishops about DeGaulle's discomfiture. Whereupon a South African bishop asked him whether he had heard the most recent Carli joke. 'NO; NE DITEMI', said Carli. The story was that after the Council's close Carli was going to immolate himself on the Piazza S. Pietro, like a Buddhist monk, in protest against the Council's work, when some bishops offered to chip in for the gasoline. 'Don't bother', Carli had told them. 'I can buy Vatican gasoline at a much cheaper price, and maybe it won't burn!'

(Xavier Rynne, THE FOURTH SESSION, pp. 235-236.)

Quotes from Two Roman Catholic Prelates Who Attended Synod Vatican 2

Giuseppe Cardinal Siri

"[Synod Vatican 2 was] the greatest disaster in recent ecclesiastical history" (Giuseppe Cardinal Siri [b. Sunday, May 20, 1906 in Genoa, Italy - d. Tuesday, May 2, 1989], Archbishop of Genoa, Italy, from Pontiff, p. 369 - Gordon Thomas/Max Morgan Witts).

 
"[Synod Vatican 2 was] a sinister farce acted out by three thousand good-for-nothings, some of whom, despite the gold [pectoral] crosses on their chests, don't even believe in the Trinity or the Virgin."

(Bishop Antonio Romeo of the Sacred Congregation of Rites in Bob Considine's column ON THE LINE in the NEW YORK JOURNAL AMERICAN of Friday, November 27, 1964).

Rotten Fruits of Synod Vatican 2

The anti-Catholic changes Synod Vatican 2 made for Roman Catholics who sincerely practiced their Faith, as best they could by the Grace of God, up to that point in time caused a variety of reactions among the Clergy, Religious, and Laity of the Roman Catholic Church.

During the "first wave" of changes, some of the Clergy and Religious left, along with some of the Laity.  But as time went on and changes continued on an on-going basis, as if caught up in some wacko evolution machine that was out of control, more of the Clergy and Religious left, along with large numbers of the Laity.

Having visited many places around the United States, We can say from first-hand observations, that what once had been Roman Catholic Church buildings have been:

1)  gutted of everything considered Sacred, e.g. Altars were replaced  by tables which faced the congregation; statues of Saints were thrown out; walls which had been beautifully painted in Catholic Traditional designs or doctrinal symbols were destroyed, some were painted over; Crucifixes were replaced with the "risen Christ" statue; the Tabernacle was frequently removed to a side room or chapel; organs from which had sounded beautiful Traditional hymns were sold or thrown out or left to rot from the decay of disuse; etc.

2) either physically demolished, many never to be rebuilt (a few were rebuilt in a hideous Satanic style which mocks the beauty and splendor of Heaven with their Hellish designs), or sold to various Protestant churches - to which most of the disgusted ex-Roman Catholics went in droves.  A few enterprising Roman Catholics were able to buy back a few, a very few, of these Roman Catholic Church buildings as the result of using various methods.

As if this attack was not enough, Roman Catholic schools, monasteries, convents, and seminaries closed their doors forever.  Hospitals were either sold or taken over by some government agency (this was especially true in Canada).

Fast forwarding to today, one finds, by analogy, what resembles Germany after World War II and the massive destruction - especially of Roman Catholic Churches - caused in large part by the Allied bombing raids!

Many churches in Western Europe have almost no congregations, while the same is also true of many churches here in the United States, except in those places where Spanish-speaking illegal immigrants, who - with the usual exceptions - are ignorant of their faith, have gathered and who jam some churches to such an extent that these churches must expand their already expanded seating accommodations.

Confusion IS Running Rampant

Father He's My Pope and Can Do No Wrong, a priest of the Satanic  Vatican 2 church, uses the NOR (Novus Ordo Rite) which is the official liturgy of the Satanic  Vatican 2 church which continues to change, change, and change - ad infinitum!  The Popes just continue to "smile" for the camera as if nothing is wrong!!!

Father American Church, a priest of the Satanic   Vatican 2 church,  makes up his own "mass", including "clown", "circus", "ventriloquist dummy", "doggie", "polka", and other such "mass" abominations for his brainwashed congregation.

Father English, a priest of the Satanic Vatican 2 church, has a congregation for whom he has a "mass" which he or one or more others composed in English.

Father Jolly John, a priest of the Satanic Vatican 2 church, has a congregation for whom he offers a "mass" using one of the so-called "missals of Pope John 23".  Why is there more than one "missal" of John 23?

On Monday, July 25, 1960 the 2nd Pope John 23 issued new rubrics for the missal and breviary.  The missals printed after this time (before the Novus Ordo Missae of Paul 6) incorporated these changes, thus making them the so-called "Missals of Pope John 23".

There are a number of different editions of the "Missal of Pope John 23" because, not content with changing the rubrics in 1960 (which, for example, included the deletion of the Confiteor recited by the Altar Server immediately before the administration of Holy Communion to the Altar Servers and to the Laity, as well as the omission of the Last Gospel), "Jolly John", as the secular media was wont to style him, inserted the name of Saint Joseph into the Canon of the Mass on Tuesday, November 13, 1962.

Father Indult uses the "Indult mass" for his congregation.

For those of you who are not familiar with this Satanic subterfuge, the "Indult mass" is NOT the Ancient Roman Rite of the Catholic Mass found in the authentic Missale Romanum, but rather the 1962 edition of the "Missal of Pope John 23" which also carries the title Missale Romanum!

The infamous "Indult mass" is based upon a document of the Congregation for Divine Worship entitled Quattuor Abhinc Annos, dated October 3, 1984.  You will find it in: AAS 76, 1984 edition, pp. 1088-1089.  It is sometimes called On the Use of the Tridentine Liturgy.  This document states in part the "Tridentine Mass" (a deliberate misnomer) could still be celebrated just so long as the Synod Vatican 2 changes were accepted and that such “masses” were not done inside parish churches.

For whatever reason(s), Pope JP-2, a.k.a. John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005] issued his Motu Proprio (on his own initiative) entitled Ecclesia Dei Adflicta of Saturday, July 2, 1988.  Under the provisions of Ecclesia Dei Adflicta, which concerned Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre's consecration of four bishops, the Vatican allowed for the “wide and generous” provision of the 1962 edition of the "Missal of Pope John 23".

In other words, whereas Quattuor Abhinc Annos required that the 1962 edition of the "Missal of Pope John 23" not be used inside parish churches (it could be used in church rectories, private homes, etc.), Ecclesia Dei Adflicta somewhat relaxed these provisions.

Then there are the Independents who either left the Satanic  Vatican 2 church or who were ordained by various Independent Bishops who have little, if anything, to do with the Vatican.

Although some of them are individuals who have not joined any other group of Priests, others belong to one of various organizations or to a "religious society" or to something similar which call themselves by various names.

Some of them were members in good standing in various Roman Catholic Religious Orders or Religious Congregations before Vatican 2 and, after becoming independent of the Vatican, have tried to keep their respective traditional Religious Rules, Habits, Customs, Spirituality, etc. - some have even established seminaries to train future Priests for their Roman Catholic Religious Orders or Religious Congregations.

The books the Independents use for the Mass and administration of the Seven Sacraments sometimes, although not always, vary slightly (primarily due to the year such books were printed).

Father Easter proclaims himself to be a "Traditional Catholic", like a few of the Bishops, and the various Priests who left after the changes began to be implemented, making sure he uses the "Missal of Pius XII" with its changed Holy Week liturgy according to the changes of Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958].

Father Old Mass has his congregation for whom he uses the "Old Mass" in Latin, i.e. Father uses a Missale Romanum which was printed sometime between 1944 and 1954 (as well as a Rituale Romanum printed from around the same time period, or perhaps a little earlier) in a valiant effort to try to single-handedly restore the liturgy of the Roman Catholic Church as it was before the days of 2nd John 23, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli [Tuesday, October 28, 1958 - Monday, June 3, 1963].

Father Ancient Mass has his congregation for whom he uses the "Ancient Mass" in Latin, i.e. Father uses a "Missale Romanum" which was printed before Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958] threw out the venerable Psalter of Saint Jerome and replaced it with a different Psalter beginning with the 1944 edition of the Missale Romanum.  This is why Father Ancient Mass uses only Missals which were printed in 1943 or earlier.

These Bishops and Priests have a variety of beliefs.  For example, some believe the popes of the Satanic Vatican 2 church are "material but not formal heretics".  Others believe the popes of the Satanic Vatican 2 church are "both material and formal heretics".  These Clergy fall into various categories including the "anti-Sedevacantist" Clergy and the "Sedevacantist" (empty papal chair - i.e. there is no pope at the present time) Clergy, etc.  All of them consider themselves to be Roman Catholics.

Who are the popes of the Satanic Vatican 2 church?

1. 2nd John 23, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli [Tuesday, October 28, 1958 - Monday, June 3, 1963]

2. Paul 6, a.k.a. P-6, Giovanni Battista Montini [Friday, June 21, 1963 - Sunday, August 6, 1978]

3.  John-Paul 1, a.k.a. JP-1, Albano Luciani [Saturday, August 26, 1978 - Thursday, September 28, 1978]

4.  John-Paul 2, a.k.a. JP-2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005]

5.  Benedict 16, a.k.a. B-16, Joseph Ratzinger [Tuesday, April 19, 2005 - present]

The Laity is confused, with some of them believing the popes of the Satanic  Vatican 2 church are both legal and valid popes and must be obeyed in all things; others that the popes of the Satanic Vatican 2 church are legal but not valid popes; others that the popes of the Satanic Vatican 2 church are not legal but valid popes; others that the popes of the Satanic Vatican 2 church are neither legal nor valid popes and obedience to them is forbidden, with some considering it sinful to obey them.

Of course there are different organizations like the Society of Saint Peter, the Society of Saint Pius X, the ORCM, the CMRI, etc.

All of the above claim to be members of the Roman Catholic Church and each and every one of them has one thing in common, whether they choose to admit it or not!  What is it?

They all believe in the existence of the Office of the Papacy.

Yet, it is this very same Office of the Papacy which, to the best of Our knowledge, except for Us, insofar as Catholics are concerned (this would exclude Protestants, the Orthodox, and a variety of other "Catholics", e.g. the Old Catholics and the Old Roman Catholics - We are NOT a member of any of these churches), NOBODY has questioned within the context of Church History, Scripture within the context of the required "unanimous consensus" of the Fathers of the Catholic Church, and Theology.

It seems to Us that all of these Catholics deliberately ignore the Office of the Papacy within the context of Church History, Scripture within the context of the required "unaimous consensus" of the Fathers of the Catholic Church, and Theology and, instead, treat this as if it is the proverbial "elephant in the room" -  a subject that is taboo about which no one dares to even mention, the thing everyone knows is there but conveniently ignores its existence due to fear of being condemned or ostracized, or pretends does not exist through an affected ignorance, or whatever else.

The reason for this probably stems from the fact that IF they did not ignore the Office of the Papacy within the context of Church History, Scripture within the context of the required "unaimous consensus" of the Fathers of the Catholic Church, and Theology, they would have to deal with the historical and theological reality - the factual Truth - that the Roman Catholic Church has morphed into the Satanic Vatican 2 church!

If this were not bad enough, the proverbial straw that breaks the back of this elephant is the fact that in this case the "elephant in the room" also happens to be a "white elephant"!!!

Just as a White Elephant is a burdensome and costly possession, given by the kings of Siam to obnoxious courtiers in order to ruin them, so also the Office of the Papacy IS a White Elephant which, along with all the rest of the Vatican bureaucracy, are burdensome and expensive to maintain.

The Office of the Papacy - A White Elephant

The First Question

Therefore, it is only logical that the first question We ask of the defenders of the Office of the Papacy is: "What good is it???"

For example, consider how the Popes of the Satanic Vatican 2 church are not part of the solution to so many problems today, they are part of the problem!

Harry S. Truman had a sign on his desk"  "The buck stops here!"  This meant that he took full responsibility for fixing whatever problems needed to be fixed and did not make excuses.

Yet today We ask:  What have the Popes of the Satanic Vatican 2 church done to fix the problems, especially the major problems caused by Synod Vatican 2?

For example, did any of these popes restore what some pre-Vatican 2 liturgists called the Ancient Roman Rite of the Mass of the Catholic Church?  The Ancient Roman Rite of the Mass is to be found in the Missale Romanum with the Quo Primum Tempore of Pope Saint Pius V, Antonio-Michele Ghislieri [Friday, January 7, 1566 - Monday, May 1, 1572] at the very beginning of this Missal?

The answer is NO!

And DO NOT insult Our intelligence by trying to say they did not know what was going on in their own church, or present various theories such as the "pope is a prisoner in the Vatican" theory or the "imposter pope" theory of which the ex-Franciscan Father Martinez is the quasi-"official" advocate, although he was not the first to present this theory and try to prove it!!!

WHO IS IN CHARGE??!!

Is it the Pope of the Satanic Vatican 2 church?

Or, is it some Vatican janitor - the "politically correct" term used by pagan secular humanists is "maintenance engineer"!!!

Or, is it Deacon the Queer who runs the Vatican from his laptop computer in San Francisco, California???

Or, maybe it is Archbishop Satanist who runs the Vatican from his ecclesiastical complex located in South Carolina??!!

The Satanic Vatican 2 church

For those of you who have read Windswept House, surely you remember how Father Malachi Brendan Martin, S.J. [b. in County Kerry, Ireland on Saturday, July 23, 1921 A.D. -  d. at New York, New York on Tuesday, July 27, 1999 A.D.] vividly describes a ceremony called "The Enthronement of the Fallen Archangel Lucifer" held in Saint Paul's Chapel in the Vatican in his book Windswept House!!

Father Malachi Martin, S.J. also explains how this "enthronement" ceremony in the Vatican was happening at the very same time that these same Satanic Rites were being done here in the United States of America down in South Carolina!!

According to an interview with The New American magazine, Father Malachi Martin, S.J. confirmed that this Satanic “Enthronement” ceremony actually DID happen, and that it happened exactly as he describes it in his book Windswept House.

The New American magazine also reported that Father Malachi verified that Windswept House is NOT a work of fiction. Rather, they report him telling them:

 “Oh yes, it is true; very much so. But the only way I could put that down into print is in novelistic form.”

Archbishop Milingo, recently vilified by the Vatican, also publicly revealed the "secret" of Satanists in the Vatican.  He was defended by Father Malachi Martin, S.J. who allegedly stated:

“Archbishop Milingo is a good Bishop and HIS CONTENTION THAT THERE ARE SATANISTS IN ROME IS COMPLETELY CORRECT.  Anybody who is acquainted with the state of affairs in the Vatican in the last 35 years is well aware that the prince of darkness [Satan] has had, and still has, his surrogates in the court of St. Peter in Rome.”

(Father Malachi Brendan Martin, S.J.).

Father Malachi Martin, S.J. wrote the following"

“Besides, the incidence of SATANIC PEDOPHILIA - rites and practices  -  was already documented among certain bishops and priests as widely dispersed as Turin, in Italy, and South Carolina, in the United States. The cultic acts of SATANIC PEDOPHILIA are considered by professionals to be the culmination of the Fallen Archangel’s rites”

(Father Malachi Brendan Martin, S.J. The Keys of This Blood, p. 632).

These are parts of the reason why We have recently begun to identify the Vatican 2 church  as SATANIC!  Thus, the reason for Our now consistent use of the term "the Satanic Vatican 2 church"!!!

The bottom line is this:

Either the Pope of the Satanic Vatican 2 church is in charge of the Satanic Vatican 2 church - which some people think is still the Roman Catholic Church - or someone or something else is in charge of the Satanic Vatican 2 church!!!

Which is it???

WHO OR WHAT IS IN CHARGE OF THE SATANIC VATICAN 2 CHURCH???

IS IT:

A Monk of Opus Dei?	A President?
A Crystal Ball?	The Mossad? (The Zionist New World Order Secret Police)
The Neo-Nazi Gestapo?	A Radical Feminist Nun?
A Puppet of the Zionist New World Order? A Teacher of Gnostic Dualistic Humanism?	An Outer Space Alien?

OR, MAYBE ONE OF THESE:

OR,
HAVE WE WARPED INTO THE TWILIGHT ZONE
OF HER HOLINESS, POPE MAROZIA I?


HER HOLINESS, POPE MAROZIA I
[Tuesday, April 14, 911 A.D. - c. December, 935 A.D.]

For those of you who may not have had an opportunity to study a reliable source of Church History which has not be "updated" or "revised" or "rewritten", here are a few facts about the Mistress of a few of the popes of the Roman Catholic Church.

Pope Sergius III [Tuesday, January 29, 904 - Tuesday, April 14, 911] was a Son of Count Benedict of Tusculum.  In order to get the Papal Office, Pope Sergius III had Pope Leo V [July, 903 A.D. - September, 903 A.D.] and Pope Christopher [October, 903 A.D. -  January, 904 A.D.] killed.  After he got the Papal Office, Pope Sergius III engaged in daily orgies in the Castle of San Angelo in Rome, which is very close to the Vatican.

One victim of His Holiness, the pedophile Pope Sergius III, was a fourteen year old girl, Marozia, who gave birth to their bastard Son who is known to history as His Holiness, Pope John XI [February, 931 - December, 935].

Apparently as a result of being victimized by His Holiness, the pedophile Pope Sergius III, Marozia became a hardened whore who - perhaps as an act of revenge, as much as an act of lust for power, seized the reins of papal power after the pedophile Pope Sergius III died on Tuesday, April 14, 911 A.D., thus becoming the de facto Pope of the Roman Catholic Church for about 24 years!

However, since it was obviously more wise and prudent, and certainly much safer, for Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I to rule through a male "puppet pope", she set about to do just this, being certain to remain "the real papal power behind the puppet on the papal throne"!

Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I, the "Roman Catholic puppet pope maker", and the Mistress of a handsome and licentious Priest, put her lover on the Papal Throne.  This puppet pope is known to history as His Holiness, puppet pope Anastasius III [April, 911 A.D. -  June, 913 A.D.].

But apparently one of three things happened:

1)  His Holiness, Pope Anastasius III, one of the lovers of Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I, tried to double-cross his Mistress, Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I, who discovered the plot, and then had him killed.

2)  Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I became bored with His Holiness, Pope Anastasius III, as her lover, and ordered his assassination.

3)  What seems the most probably scenario is that, for whatever reason(s), Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I wanted to replace His Holiness, puppet pope Anastasius III, with another one of her lovers.  So in order to have a new puppet pope, Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I had her creature and lousy lover, His Holiness, puppet Pope Anastasius III, killed.

Now that the healthy young stud, His Holiness, puppet Pope Anastasius III, had died "mysteriously" during June, 913 A.D., Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I, the "Roman Catholic puppet pope maker", could replace the dead puppet pope with a new Roman Catholic puppet pope.

Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I, the "Roman Catholic puppet pope maker" and the "Roman Catholic puppet pope killer", wasted no time!  As the Mistress of the handsome and licentious Lando of Sabinum, Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I, made her lover the new Roman Catholic puppet pope the following month, perhaps within a few days or weeks after the untimely death of His Holiness, puppet pope Anastasius III.

Lando of Sabinum would now be known to history as His Holiness, puppet pope Lando I [July, 913 A.D. - February, 914 A.D.].  But apparently what happened to His Holiness, puppet pope Anastasius III now happened to His Holiness, puppet pope Lando I?  In any event, this young buck also died "mysteriously" during February, 914 A.D. having been a puppet pope for only about seven months.

Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I and her Mother, Theodora, and her Sister, Theodora, were now - all three of them - the Mistresses of a soldier whom, with the tacit approval of her Mother (which she really did not need - maybe her mother was wanting to be a Roman Catholic "Popess" too??!!), Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I made the successor of His Holiness, puppet pope Lando I.  This soldier/puppet-pope is known to history as His Holiness, puppet pope John X [March, 914 A.D. - May, 928 A.D.].  Perhaps the fact that he was a solider accounts for his 14 year reign as a Roman Catholic puppet pope?

But this fact protected him for only so long because His Holiness, puppet pope John X, the lover of Theodora and her Daughters, Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I, and Theodora, was taken prisoner by Guido, the Husband of Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I.  Yes, surprise, surprise, here is a MARRIED ROMAN CATHOLIC POPESS, of all things!!!  Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I was actually married at some point in time before this!

After Guido, the Husband of Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I, had captured His Holiness, puppet pope John X, he had the lustful puppet pope thrown into a dungeon where he was forthwith dispatched from this life by being suffocated with a pillow.  Most probably Guido himself was the executioner of His Holiness?!

Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I, the "Roman Catholic puppet pope maker" and the "Roman Catholic puppet pope breaker" and the "Roman Catholic puppet pope killer", now turned to her next victim/puppet-pope-to-be!  At this time, Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I was the mistress of a young lustful Priest (she was apparently tired of soldiers by now?), whom she made the newest Roman Catholic puppet pope - known to history as His Holiness, puppet pope Leo VI [May, 928 A.D. - December, 928 A.D.].  His lustful Holiness, the lustful puppet pope Leo VI was killed a few weeks later by orders from the fickle Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I.

The murder of the latest lustful Roman Catholic puppet pope opened the door for Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I to quickly make another one of her harem of male lovers the new Roman Catholic puppet pope!

This time Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I quickly picked her choicest puppet candidate from among her male harem and made him the new Roman Catholic puppet pope who is known to history as His Holiness, puppet pope Stephen VII [December, 928 A.D. - February, 931 A.D.].

Perhaps the Papal Tiara gave him a big head or maybe the puppet pope tried to cut his puppet strings?  For whatever reason(s) - according to at least one source the claim is made that he, who had fallen for her, now fell from her favor - the consistently fickle Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I, the "Roman Catholic puppet pope maker" and the "Roman Catholic puppet pope breaker" and "the Roman Catholic puppet pope killer", now turned her wrath against the lustful Roman Catholic puppet pope, His Holiness, puppet pope Stephen VII.  Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I gave orders that His lustful Holiness be killed.  This time she had a totally different reason for having one of her puppet creations killed!  Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I wanted her illegitimate Son to be the next puppet pope!

And so it came to be that the Mistress of lustful Roman Catholic puppet popes, Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I, made her biological Son a puppet pope.  His Holiness, took the name known to history as His Holiness, the Roman Catholic puppet pope John XI [February, 931 A.D. - December, 935 A.D.], who was the illegitimate Son of Pope Sergius III [Tuesday, January 29, 904 - Tuesday, April 14, 911] and his Mother, Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I.

His Holiness, the Roman Catholic puppet pope John XI was only 20 years old when his Mother, Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I, made him a Roman Catholic puppet pope.  What should come as no surprise, His Holiness, puppet pope John XI, was also murdered!  But, he was not murdered on orders from his Mother, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I, the "Roman Catholic puppet pope maker" and the "Roman Catholic puppet pope breaker" and the Roman Catholic puppet pope killer"!  No, instead this puppet pope was killed by another relative!

What happened was that the ever-lustful, ever-fickle Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I, the infamous "Roman Catholic puppet pope maker" and the "Roman Catholic puppet pope breaker" and the "Roman Catholic puppet pope killer", had married her Husband's Brother, Hugo, the King of Lombardy, in 931 A.D.

But, you are thinking, how could this happen since Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I was already married to Guido who, obviously on orders from his Wife, Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I, had captured His Holiness, puppet pope John X, had the lustful Pope thrown into a dungeon, and had him smothered with a pillow?

The answer is that the ever-lustful, ever-fickle, puppet pope Mistress and puppet pope killer, the murderess Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I, the infamous "Roman Catholic puppet pope maker" and the "Roman Catholic puppet pope breaker" and the "Roman Catholic puppet pope killer", was very careful to first poison her Husband Guido, before Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I married her Husband's Brother, Hugo, the King of Lombardy, in 931 A.D.!

What happened next was that His Holiness, the Roman Catholic puppet pope John XI, was imprisoned by his half-Brother Alberico!  This same Alberico also imprisoned - guess WHO??!!  - the ever-lustful, ever-fickle, Pope-Mistress, Pope-murderess, who was the notorious and infamous "Roman Catholic puppet pope maker", the "Roman Catholic puppet pope breaker", and the "Roman Catholic puppet pope killer", Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I!!!!

So, both His Holiness, the Roman Catholic puppet pope John XI, and his biological Mother, Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I, were imprisoned by Alberico in March, 933 A.D.  The Roman Catholic puppet pope John XI was killed in prison sometime during December, 935 A.D., probably on orders from his half-Brother Alberico?  Her Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope Marozia I most probably was killed at the same time and place as was her Son, Pope John XI?  If this is true, she was most probably also murdered on orders from Alberico?

The Answer Is....

The answer to WHO OR WHAT IS IN CHARGE OF THE SATANIC VATICAN 2 CHURCH??? most probably for most Roman Catholics, and for the de facto members of the Satanic Vatican 2 church, is - the Pope in the Vatican!!

IF this answer is correct, then, when one sees all of the evils in the Satanic Vatican 2 church about which no one is doing anything, or apparently doing next to nothing at the very best, or doing things which do not really fix the real problems, there can be only one of two reasons for this evil:

1) The Pope in the Vatican is powerless - this is absurd!  Do not insult Our intelligence!

2)  The Pope in the Vatican has absolute power - and since he has done nothing to stop this evil and restore things to the way they were before Synod Vatican 2 - the only logical conclusion can be that either the present Vatican 2 Pope (B-16) is evil (the jury of history has yet to decide this issue), and/or that the Office of the Papacy itself is evil.

Because of its importance, We repeat what We have stated above, namely, it is this very same Office of the Papacy which, to the best of Our knowledge, except for Us, insofar as Catholics are concerned (this would exclude Protestants, the Orthodox, and a variety of other "Catholics", e.g. the Old Catholics and the Old Roman Catholics - We are NOT a member of any of these churches), NOBODY has questioned within the context of Church History, Scripture within the context of the required "unaimous consensus" of the Fathers of the Catholic Church, and Theology.

Apparently both the Roman Catholic Church Clergy as well as those of the Satanic Vatican 2 church have made this a taboo subject, which is really a classical case of affected ignorance.  It should come as no surprise that We know of no member of the Roman Catholic Clergy, or of the Clergy of the Satanic  Vatican 2 church who wants to honestly, sincerely, and openly discuss the details of why and how and what it is that makes the Office of the Papacy per se evil!

For the record, concerning the subject of affected ignorance - just in case there may be those who either do not know what it is or who know what it is but who want to sluff it off or ignore it or pretend it does not exist or that it does not pertain to them or is irrelevant or of no consequence, it should be noted that the Angelic Doctor teaches this about it:

“Affected ignorance does not excuse from guilt, but rather aggravates it since it shows that a man is so strongly attached to sin that he wishes to incur ignorance lest he avoid sinning.  The Jews therefore sinned, as crucifiers not only of the Man-Christ, but also as of God.”  (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D. in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, SUMMA THEOLOGICA  III, 47, 5 Reply to Objection 3.)

But this is not just limited to the Office of the Papacy.

What is it that makes the Mass, the Mass?

There is yet another proverbial "elephant in the room" which is this question, but most especially the answer to this question:  "What is it that makes the Mass, the Mass?"

Prelates and Priests, both from the Satanic Vatican 2 church and the so-called Traditional Catholics who consider only themselves to be the real Roman Catholics, along with a few quasi-erudite Laity, have conveniently ignored the extremely important answer to this question of "What is it that makes the Mass, the Mass?"!!

The answer is to be found in Our copyrighted book entitled SECRET 7:   What Makes the Mass the Mass.  The basic answer is to be found first in the authentic ontological essence of the Mass which the Eternal High Priest, Jesus Christ, perfectly instituted and concerning which Jesus Christ never gave anyone - not even any Apostle, and certainly not the Catholic Church He instituted - the power, authority, or jurisdiction to change or to modify in any way whatsoever!!!

The basic answer is to be found second in the authentic metaphysical essence of the Mass which the Eternal High Priest, Jesus Christ, perfectly instituted and concerning which Jesus Christ never gave anyone - not even any Apostle, and certainly not the Catholic Church He instituted - the power, authority, or jurisdiction to change or to modify in any way whatsoever!!!

By the way, the NOR - the per se illegal and invalid Novus Ordo Rite, the official rite of the Satanic Vatican 2 church, does NOT have either the authentic ontological and/or metaphysical essence of the Mass which the Eternal High Priest, Jesus Christ, perfectly instituted and concerning which Jesus Christ never gave anyone - not even any Apostle, and certainly not the Catholic Church He instituted - the power, authority, or jurisdiction to change or to modify in any way whatsoever!!

Authentic Sources

Anyone can say anything.  Where is the proof?

Authentic Ecclesiastical History is a witness and provides a great deal of proof.

Authentic Ecclesiastical History (not the revised versions) tells us that the Office of the Papacy is founded upon the sand of both interpolated and forged documents!   The heretical and schismatic Roman Catholic Church, and with it the Office of the Papacy, were both founded by the Bishop of Rome, Nicholas I  [Wednesday, April 24, 858 - Sunday, November 13, 867], the second "anti-Christ" Universal Bishop, and the first Pope of the heretical and schismatic Roman Catholic Church on Tuesday, October 23, 863 A.D.!  The Bishop of Rome, Nicholas I, whether knowingly or unknowingly, used interpolated and forged documents to make himself the second "anti-Christ" Universal Bishop, and the first Pope of the heretical and schismatic Roman Catholic Church!

We prove these things in detail from Our primarily historical copyrighted book entitled SECRET 2:   How the Bishop of Rome Became the Pope of Rome and How the Pope of Rome Has Remained the Pope of Rome, which has 675 pages and 1,123 endnotes.

Our copyrighted book entitled SECRET 5:  The Twin Heresies of Papal Primacy and Papal Infallibility deals with this subject primarily from a Patristic and theological perspective.

The Second Question

The second question We ask of the defenders of the Office of the Papacy is "How many millions and millions and millions and more millions of immortal souls have been cast into Hell because of the evils of the Office of the Papacy???"

YOU have a duty and an obligation to save your own soul first, and then to help your loved ones to save theirs.  But anyone who goes to the Satanic Vatican 2 church is deprived of every source of Sanctifying Grace due to the per se invalid and Satanic liturgical rites used for Masses - they call "the Lord's Supper" and for the Seven Sacraments!

Such souls are in a spiritual desert in which there is neither food nor water for their souls languishing with the dehydration of the fake and phony "sacraments" and the emaciation of the fake and phony "masses" which do NOT have either the authentic ontological essence or the metaphysical essence of their respective rites which Jesus Christ perfectly instituted and which can never be changed for any reason by anyone or any group or organization!

A word to the wise is sufficient whereas an ocean of words to the foolish can never suffice!

“There is sufficient light for those who wish to see and sufficient obscurity for those who do not wish to see.”

(Blaise Pascal [b. at Clermont-Ferrand, Monday, June 19, 1623 - d. in Paris, Saturday, August 19, 1662], PENSÉES SUR LA RELIGION, Section VII,  Morality and Doctrine, ¶ 430, 1660 A.D.).

Our Duties and Responsibilities to God as His Ambassador

We are not being mean, or desirous of hurting anyone by asking this second question.  On the contrary, We fulfill Our duties and responsibilities to Almighty God by trying to warn all Catholics of these terrible dangers to their immortal souls which can send them to Hell for all eternity!

"Not on account of their own sins, but on account of the sins of others that they did not prevent, Priests are often condemned to Hell."

(Saint John Chrysostom [b. Antioch, c. 347 A.D. - d. at Commana in Pontus on Friday, September 14, 407 A.D.], Patriarch of Constantinople [Thursday, February 26, 398 A.D. - Thursday, June 24, 404 A.D.], exiled from his See the 2nd time on Thursday, June 24, 404 A.D., Father and Doctor of the Catholic Church).

"The Priest that fails either through negligence or ignorance to assist souls, renders himself accountable to God for all of the souls that are lost through his fault.  Hence, if a Priest does not fulfill his duty of saving souls and rescuing them from vices, he must render to God an account of all of the souls that are lost through his fault."

(Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D., in Fossa Nuova, Italy]).

We must speak out against all of the evils in the Roman Catholic Church and in the  Satanic Vatican 2 church, mindful how the poison of the heresy of Modernism has corrupted most of the Clergy.  We are not permitted to have regard for those to whom We speak being mindful of how even the hypocrites were forced by the facts to speak the Truth to the perfect Teacher, Christ:  "Master, we know that thou art a true speaker, and teachest the way of God in truth, neither carest thou for any man:  for thou dost not regard the person of men." (Matthew 22:16).

It is Our DUTY to speak out, to cry out, just as it was the duty of Saint John the Baptist to speak out and not to regard the person to whom he spoke, as a wise Prelate has written:

"Do not be one of those timourous physicians who like their tranquility more than the saving of the sick...  Even though Herodias [it was actually her daughter, Salome] should dance before Herod, should ask for John's head and should obtain it from the detestable King, John's duty is to cry out: NON LICET! [It is not permitted!].”

(Bishop Saint Ivo of Chartres, a.k.a. Yves, Ive, Yvo  [b. Beauvais, France or Auteuil, France, c. 1040 A.D. - d. Chartres, France, Tuesday, May 30, 1116 A.D.], Bishop of Chartres [1090 A.D. - Tuesday, May 30, 1116 A.D.], Letter # 24, To Bishop Hugh of Lyons, October, 1094 A.D.).

Therefore, let NO ONE question Our Authority and/or try to give Us reasons WHY We should not speak out against all of these evils to warn Catholics about such dangers.  On the contrary, as a Prelate of the Catholic Church, We are an ambassador of Almighty God.  It is Our duty and responsibility to instruct the ignorant and to use Our Crozier, not only in a physical way, but in a moral way, mindful of the symbolism of the Crozier which is an ornamental staff in the shape of a shepherd’s staff, which is conferred on Bishops, mitered Abbots, and certain other Prelates.  It sometimes consists of a metal tube which is plated with silver and gold.  Sometimes it is made of wood.  Some Croziers are elaborately carved wood.  In earlier centuries some of them were made from pure gold and silver.

The crook of the staff, i.e. the rounded top of the Crozier, symbolizes that the Bishop - of whatever rank of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction - should act as a shepherd to those who may wander from his fold.  The pointed lower end symbolizes that the Prelate should goad on those who are Spiritually indifferent.  The tall shaft symbolizes that the Prelate should support those who are Spiritually weak.  Just as shepherds of sheep also use their shepherd's staff to chase away wolves and to beat up ravening lions, so also We use Our Crozier to chase away the Spiritual and Moral and Ecclesiastical wolves, and beat up the ravening lions, who seek to devour those who are ignorant, those who are confused by all of the Satanic changes, those who are worn out and exhausted from trying, by the Grace of God, to faithfully carrying their crosses each and every day in the imitation of Christ.

1    And I saw a new heaven and a new earth.  For the first heaven and the first earth was gone, and the sea is now no more.
2    And I John saw the holy city, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
3    And I heard a great voice from the throne, saying:  Behold the tabernacle of God with men, and he will dwell with them.  And they shall be his people; and God himself with them shall be their God.
4    And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes:  and death shall be no more, nor mourning, nor crying, nor sorrow shall be any more, for the former things are passed away.
5    And he that sat on the throne, said:  Behold, I make all things new.  And he said to me:  Write, for these words are most faithful and true.
6    And he said to me:  It is done.  I am Alpha and Omega; the beginning and the end.  To him that thirsteth, I will give of the fountain of the water of life, freely.
7    He that shall overcome shall possess these things, and I will be his God; and he shall be my son.

(Apocalypse 21:1-7).

God bless you!

In the Holy Hearts of Jesus and Mary

Jacobus Maria DeJesus, C.M.F., D.D.
Editor

---

Psalm 81
Deus Stetit
A Scriptural Basis for Pope Idolatry

An exhortation to judges and men in power.
A Psalm for Asaph.

81:1.   God hath stood in the congregation of gods: and being in the midst of them he judgeth gods.
81:2.   How long will you judge unjustly: and accept the persons of the wicked?
81:3.   Judge for the needy and fatherless: do justice to the humble and the poor.
81:4.   Rescue the poor; and deliver the needy out of the hand of the sinner.
81:5.   They have not known nor understood: they walk on in darkness: all the foundations of the earth shall be moved.
81:6.   I have said: You are gods and all of you the sons of the most High.
81:7.   But you like men shall die: and shall fall like one of the princes.
81:8.   Arise, O God, judge thou the earth: for thou shalt inherit among all the nations.

Pope Idolatry

Psalm 81, verse 6, especially “You are gods” was either directed quoted, or at least referenced, and sometimes an attempt was made to interpret the meaning of this phrase, in a number of ecclesiastical writings  during the first centuries of the Catholic Church.  This is a very important historical fact.  The germane nature of this historical fact will become self-evident momentarily.  For now, here are some of these writings.

Saint Justin Martyr - born c. 100 A.D.
Bishop Saint Irenæus - born c. 130 A.D.
Father Clement of Alexandria - born c. 150  A.D.
Tertullian - born 155 A.D.
Bishop Saint Cyprian of Carthage - born 190  A.D.
Hippolytus I - anti-Pope in 217 A.D.
4th Century Forgery - probably forged sometime during 300 A.D. to 324 A.D. - APOSTOLIC CONSTITUTIONS.
Bishop Theodoret of Cyrus - born c. 390 A.D.

c. 100 A.D.

<<  And when I saw that they were perturbed because I said that we are the sons of God, I anticipated their questioning, and said, "Listen, sirs, how the Holy Ghost speaks of this people, saying that they are all sons of the Highest; and how this very Christ will be present in their assembly, rendering judgment to all men. The words are spoken by David, and are, according to your version of them, thus:   'God standeth in the congregation of gods; He judgeth among the gods. How long do you judge unjustly, and accept the persons of the wicked? Judge for the orphan and the poor, and do justice to the humble and needy. Deliver the needy, and save the poor out of the hand of the wicked. They know not, neither have they understood; they walk on in darkness: all the foundations of the earth shall be shaken. I said, You are gods, and are all children of the Most High. But ye die like men, and fall like one of the princes. Arise, O God! judge the earth, for Thou shalt inherit all nations.”  But in the version of the Seventy it is written, “Behold, you die like men, and fall like one of the princes, in order to manifest the disobedience of men, - I mean of Adam and Eve, - and the fall of one of the princes, i.e., of him who was called the serpent, who fell with a great overthrow, because he deceived Eve. But as my discourse is not intended to touch on this point, but to prove to you that the Holy Ghost reproaches men because they were made like God, free from suffering and death, provided that they kept His commandments, and were deemed deserving of the name of His sons, and yet they, becoming like Adam and Eve, work out death for themselves; let the interpretation of the Psalm be held just as you wish, yet thereby it is demonstrated that all men are deemed worthy of becoming "gods," and of having power to become sons of the Highest; and shall be each by himself judged and condemned like Adam and Eve. Now I have proved at length that Christ is called God. >>

(Saint Justin Martyr [b. Flavia Neapolis, Palestine c. 100 A.D. - d. Rome, Italy c. 165 A.D.], THE SECOND APOLOGY OF JUSTIN FOR THE CHRISTIANS - Addressed to the Roman Senate, Chapter 124,  Christians Are the Sons of God.)

c. 130 A.D.

<<  "...I have said, You are gods, and all sons of the Most High." To those, no doubt, who have received the grace of the "adoption, by which we cry, Abba Father."  >>

(Saint Irenæus [b. Proconsular Asia c. 130 A.D. - d. Lyons, France either on Monday, June 28, or Monday, August 23, in about 202 A.D.], Bishop of Lyons, Father of the Catholic Church.  He was a Disciple of Bishop Saint Polycarp [c. 69 A.D. - d. martyred on Saturday, February 23, 166 A.D.].  Saint Polycarp, in turn, was a Disciple of Saint John the Apostle, Evangelist and author of the Apocalypse [b.  ?  A.D. - d. Ephesus, c. 101 A.D.], who made him the Bishop of Smyrna.  Saint Polycarp is an Apostolic Father of the Catholic Church . Bishop Saint Irenæus is the author of AGAINST THE HERESIES, {written 180 A.D. - 199 A.D.}, Book III, Chapter VI, The Holy Ghost, Throughout the Old Testament Scriptures, Made Mention of No Other God or Lord, Save Him Who Is the True God.)

c. 130 A.D.

<<  4. ...He declares, "I have said, You are gods; and ye are all sons of the Highest." But since we could not sustain the power of divinity, He adds, "But ye shall die like men," setting forth both truths--the kindness of His free gift, and our weakness, and also that we were possessed of power over ourselves. >>

(Bishop Saint Irenæus, AGAINST THE HERESIES, {written 180 A.D. - 199 A.D.},  Book IV, Chapter XXXVIII, Why Man Was Not Made Perfect from the Beginning.)

c. 150  A.D.

<<  ...It is time, then, for us to say that the pious Christian alone is rich and wise, and of noble birth, and thus call and believe him to be God's image, and also His likeness, having become righteous and holy and wise by Jesus Christ, and so far already like God. Accordingly this grace is indicated by the prophet, when he says, "I said that you are gods, and all sons of the Highest." For us, yea us, He has adopted, and wishes to be called the Father of us alone, not of the unbelieving. Such is then our position who are the attendants of Christ. >>

(Father Clement of Alexandria, a.k.a. Titus Flavius Clemens [b.  at Alexandria or Athens c. 150  A.D. - d. probably between 215 A.D. - 220 A.D.], a Father of the Catholic Church, the illustrious head of the Catechetical School at Alexandria at the close of the second century, who was often quoted by the famous Church historian Eusebius, EXHORTATION TO THE HEATHEN, Chapter XII, Exhortation to Abandon Their Old Errors and Listen to the Instructions of Christ.)

Father Clement of Alexandria was indefatigable in his exposure of the entire pagan system of “lords many and gods many”.  His writings would have found a wide audience in the West.  Why?

Because "all the churches of the West," says the historian of Latin Christianity, "were Greek religious colonies. Their language was Greek, their organization Greek, their writers Greek, their Scriptures and their ritual were Greek. Through Greek, the communications of the churches of the West were constantly kept up with the East .... Thus the Church at Rome was but one of a confederation of Greek religious republics surrounded by Christianity."  This confederation was the Holy Catholic Church.

c. 150  A.D.

<<  ...The same also takes place in our case, whose exemplar Christ became. Being baptized, we are illuminated; illuminated, we become sons; being made sons, we are made perfect; being made perfect, we are made immortal. "I," says He, "have said that you are gods, and all sons of the Highest." This work is variously called grace, and illumination, and perfection, and washing: washing, by which we cleanse away our sins; grace, by which the penalties accruing to transgressions are remitted; and illumination, by which that holy light of salvation is beheld, that is, by which we see God clearly. Now we call that perfect which wants nothing. For what is yet wanting to him who knows God? For it were truly monstrous that that which is not complete should be called a gift (or act) of God's grace. Being perfect, He consequently bestows perfect gifts.  >>

(Father Clement of Alexandria, Pædagogus - THE INSTRUCTOR, a.k.a. “The Tutor”, Book I, Chapter VI, The Name “Children” Does Not Imply Instruction in Elementary Principles.)

c. 150  A.D.

<<   ...But that man with whom the Word dwells does not alter himself, does not get himself up: he has the form which is of the Word; he is made like to God; he is beautiful; he does not ornament himself: his is beauty, the true beauty, for it is God; and that man becomes God, since God so wills. Heraclitus, then, rightly said, "Men are gods, and gods are men." For the Word Himself is the manifest mystery: God in man, and man God. And the Mediator executes the Father's will; for the Mediator is the Word, who is common to both--the Son of God, the Saviour of men; His Servant, our Teacher. And the flesh being a slave, as Paul testifies, how can one with any reason adorn the handmaid like a pimp? For that which is of flesh has the form of a servant. >>

(Father Clement of Alexandria, Pædagogus - THE INSTRUCTOR, a.k.a. “The Tutor”, Book III, Chapter I, On the True Beauty.)

c. 150  A.D.

<< ...Those that are superior to Pleasure, who rise above the passions, who know what they do--the Gnostics, who are greater than the world. "I said, You are gods; and all sons of the Highest." To whom speaks the Lord? To those who reject as far as possible all that is of man. And the apostle says, "For ye are not any longer in the flesh, but in the Spirit." And again he says, "Though in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh." "For flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, neither doth corruption inherit incorruption." "Lo, ye shall die like men," the Spirit has said, confuting us.   >>

(Father Clement of Alexandria,  THE STROMATA, or Miscellanies; the Greek title, according to Eusebius and Photius, was “Titus Flavius Clement’s miscellaneous collections of speculative [Gnostic] notes bearing upon the true philosophy”, Book II, Chapter XX, The True Gnostic Exercises Patience and Self-Restraint.)

c. 150  A.D.

<< ...On this wise it is possible for the Gnostic already to have become God. "I said, You are gods, and sons of the highest." And Empedocles says that the souls of the wise become gods, writing as follows:--

"At last prophets, minstrels, and physicians,
And the foremost among mortal men, approach;
Whence spring gods supreme in honours."

Man, then, genetically considered, is formed in accordance with the idea of the connate spirit. For he is not created formless and shapeless in the workshop of nature, where mystically the production of man is accomplished, both art and essence being common. But the individual man is stamped according to the impression produced in the soul by the objects of his choice. >>

(Father Clement of Alexandria, THE STROMATA, or Miscellanies; the Greek title, according to Eusebius and Photius, was “Titus Flavius Clement’s miscellaneous collections of speculative [Gnostic] notes bearing upon the true philosophy”, Book IV, Chapter XXIII, The Same Subject Continued  - The True Gnostic Does Good, Not from Fear of Punishment or Hope of Reward, but Only for the Sake of Good Itself.)

155 A.D.

<<  But this argument you will try to shake with an objection from the name of God, by alleging that that name is a vague one, and applied to other beings also; as it is written, "God standeth in the congregation of the mighty;  He judgeth among the gods." And again, "I have said, You are gods." As therefore the attribute of supremacy would be inappropriate to these, although they are called gods, so is it to the Creator. This is a foolish objection; and my answer to it is, that its author fails to consider that quite as strong an objection might be urged against the (superior) god of Marcion: he too is called god, but is not on that account proved to be divine, as neither are angels nor men, the Creator's handwork. If an identity of names affords a presumption in support of equality of condition, how often do worthless menials strut insolently in the names of kings--your Alexanders, Caesars, and Pompeys! >>

(Tertullian, a.k.a. Quintus Septimius Florens Tertullianus [b. Carthage, 155 A.D. - d. 225 A.D.], THE FIVE BOOKS AGAINST MARCION, Book I, Wherein Is Described the God of Marcion - He Is Shown to Be Utterly Wanting in All the Attributes of the True God, Chapter VII,  Other Beings Besides God Are in Scripture Called God. This Objection Frivolous, for it Is Not a Question of Names. The Divine Essence Is the Thing at Issue. Heresy, in its General Terms, Thus Far Treated.)

155 A.D.

<<  ...Well, then, you say, we ourselves at that rate possess nothing of God. But indeed we do, and shall continue to do--only it is from Him that we receive it, and not from ourselves. For we shall be even gods, if we, shall deserve to be among those of whom He declared, "I have said, You are gods," and, "God standeth in the congregation of the gods." But this comes of His own grace, not from any property in us, because it is He alone who can make gods. The property of Matter, however, he makes to be that which it has in common with God. Otherwise, if it received from God the property which belongs to God,--I mean its attributes of eternity -one might then even suppose that it both possesses an attribute in common with God, and yet at the same time is not God. But what inconsistency is it for him to allow that there is a conjoint possession of an attribute with God, and also to wish that what he does not refuse to Matter should be, after all, the exclusive privilege of God! >>

(Tertullian, THE FIVE BOOKS AGAINST MARCION, Book V, Part III, Against Hermogenes, Containing an Argument Against His Opinion That Matter Is Eternal, Chapter V, Hermogenes Coquets with His Own Argument, as If Rather Afraid of It. After Investing Matter with Divine Qualities, He Tries to Make it Somehow Inferior to God.)

155 A.D.

<<  ...If, indeed, you follow those who did not at the time endure the Lord when showing Himself to be the Son of God, because they would not believe Him to be the Lord, then (I ask you)call to mind along with them the passage where it is written, "I have said, You are gods, and you are children of the Most High;" and again, "God standeth in the congregation of gods;" in order that, if the Scripture has not been afraid to designate as gods human beings, who have become sons of God by faith, you may be sure that the same Scripture has with greater propriety conferred the name of the Lord on the true and one-only Son of God.   >>

(Tertullian, THE FIVE BOOKS AGAINST MARCION, Book V, Part VII, Against Praxeas, in Which He Defends, in All Essential Points, the Doctrine of the Holy Trinity, Chapter XIII, The Force of Sundry Passages of Scripture Illustrated in Relation to the Plurality of Persons and Unity of Substance. There Is No Polytheism Here, since the Unity Is Insisted on as a Remedy Against Polytheism.)

155 A.D.

<<  ...And to prevent their thinking Him deserving of this fate, as if He had claimed to be considered as God Himself, that is, the Father, by having said, "I and my Father are One," representing Himself as the Father's divine Son, and not as God Himself, He says, "If it is written in your law, I said, You are gods; and if the Scripture cannot be broken, say you of Him whom the Father hath sanctified and sent into the world, that He blasphemeth, because He said, I am the Son of God? If I do not the works of my Father, believe me not; but if I do, even if you will not believe me, still believe the works; and know that I am in the Father, and the Father in me."[12] It must therefore be by the works that the Father is in the Son, and the Son in the Father; and so it is by the works that we understand that the Father is one with the Son. >>

(Tertullian, THE FIVE BOOKS AGAINST MARCION, Book V, Part VII, Against Praxeas, in Which He Defends, in All Essential Points, the Doctrine of the Holy Trinity, Chapter XXII, Sundry Passages of St. John Quoted, to Show the Distinction Between the Father and the Son.  Even Praxeas' Classic Text - I and My Father Are One - shown to Be Against Him.)

190  A.D.

<<  ¶ 6 ...Also in the eighty-first Psalm: "God stood in the congregation of gods, and judging gods in the midst." And again in the same place: "I have said, You are gods; and ye are all the children of the Highest: but ye shall die like men."  But if they who have been righteous, and have obeyed the divine precepts, may be called gods, how much more is Christ, the Son of God, God! Thus He Himself says in the Gospel according to John: "Is it not written in the law, that I said, You are gods? If He called them gods to whom the word of God was given, and the Scripture cannot be relaxed, do you say to Him whom the Father hath sanctified and sent into the world, that thou blasphemest, because I said, I am the Son of God? But if I do not the works of my Father, believe me not; but if I do, and you will not believe me, believe the works, and know that the Father is in me, and I in Him."  >>

(Bishop Saint Cyprian of Carthage, a.k.a. Thaschus Cæcilius Cyprianus, [b. 190  A.D. - d. Martyred on Saturday, August 14, 258 A.D.]. He converted to the Catholic Church later in his life time.  He was Ordained a Priest in 247 A.D. and Consecrated as the Bishop of Carthage in about 249 A.D., TREATISES OF CYPRIAN, Treatise XII, Three Books of Testimonies Against the Jews, Second Book - Heads, Testimonies, ¶ 6. That Christ is God.)

217 A.D.

<<  ...This, he asserts, is that which has been written: "I said, You are gods, and all children of the highest;" >>

(Hippolytus I, a.k.a. Hippolytus of Rome [217 A.D. - 236 A.D.], PHILOSOPHUMENA, a.k.a. The Refutation of All Heresies, Book V, Chapter II.)

c. 300 A.D. - 324 A.D.

The APOSTOLIC CONSTITUTIONS, of which it was claimed that they were the written instructions of the Twelve Apostles which had been compiled by Clement, the Bishop of Rome [c. 88 - 97 A.D.], are a forgery.

Who was the forger?  Most probably the same person who grossly interpolated the Seven Epistles of Saint Ignatius of Antioch?

The original authentic Seven Epistles of Saint Ignatius of Antioch [b. Syria c. 50 A.D. - d. martyred at Rome in 107 A.D.] were most probably interpolated sometime between 300 A.D. to within about 324 A.D., which would be about a year or so before the formal opening of the First Council of Nicæa, Nicæa I [Saturday, June 20, 325 A.D. - Tuesday, August 25, 325 A.D.] on Saturday, June 20, 325 A.D. by the Roman Emperor Constantine I, a.k.a. Constantine the Great, a.k.a. C. Flavius Valerius Constantinus [b. at Naissus, now Nisch in Servia sometime between 274 A.D. - 288 A.D. - d. after being Baptized by the heretical Arian Bishop, Eusebius of Nicomedia, in Nicomedia at the Villa Aquilo in May, 337 A.D.]; Roman Emperor [proclaimed Caesar by his troops on Wednesday, July 25, 306 A.D. - May, 337 A.D.].

The Seven Epistles of Saint Ignatius of Antioch were originally written between about 105 A.D. to 107 A.D. by Saint Ignatius of Antioch  on his way to martyrdom in Rome.  From Smyrna, in Asia Minor, Saint Ignatius of Antioch wrote the Epistles to the Ephesians, Magnesians, Trallians, and to the Romans.  From Troas, he wrote his Epistles to the Philadelphians, to the Christians of Smyrna, and to Saint Polycarp.

Dr. Heinrich Brueck, a Professor of Theology in the Ecclesiastical Seminary of Mentz, wrote “History of the Catholic Church for use in Seminaries and Colleges”.  This book received an Imprimatur from the Roman Catholic Metropolitan Archbishop Peter Richard Kenrick.  In referring to the Ignatian Epistles, Dr. Brueck clearly states that it is “the other interpolated, or longer form” which is not genuine but false.

Since there is no such thing as mere “coincidence”, it seems no surprise at all to discover that the first six books of the forgery known as the APOSTOLIC CONSTITUTIONS, a.k.a. The Constitutions or Teachings of the Holy Apostles, were forged about the same time period, i.e. from c. 300 A.D. - 324 A.D.

Among other things, the forger(s) made use of the Epistle of Barnabas, which belongs to the first half of the second century and enlarged and adapted the Didache of the second century and the Didascalia of the third century, as well as the Seven Epistles of Saint Ignatius of Antioch, to his own view of morals, worship, and discipline, and clothed them with Apostolic authority in the Apostolic Constitutions.

Additional proof for this position can be posited from the fact that the first six books are so full of the same phrases found in the interpolation of the Seven Epistles of Saint Ignatius of Antioch, that the forger(s)  of the Apostolic Constitutions, must either have forged the Apostolic Constitutions very shortly after the Seven Epistles of Saint Ignatius of Antioch were interpolated, or that the interpolator(s) of the Seven Epistles of Saint Ignatius of Antioch are the very same person(s) who forged the Apostolic Constitutions!

Most researchers seem to agree that the interpolation of the Seven Epistles of Saint Ignatius of Antioch happened just before (or perhaps during?) the forging of the first six books, and possibly part of the seventh book, of the Apostolic Constitutions.  The same phrases argue for the same person(s) authoring both of these products within a few years of each other.

<<  Of First - Fruits and Tithes, and after What Manner the Bishop
Is Himself to Partake of Them, or to Distribute Them to Others.

XXV .....“Hear this, you of the laity also, the elect Church of God. For the people were formerly called "the people of God," and "an holy nation." You, therefore, are the holy and sacred "Church of God, enrolled in heaven, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people," a bride adorned for the Lord God, a great Church, a faithful Church. Hear attentively now what was said formerly: oblations and tithes belong to Christ our High Priest, and to those who minister to Him. Tenths of salvation are the first letter of the name of Jesus. Hear, O thou Holy Catholic Church, who hast escaped the ten plagues, and hast received the ten commandments, and hast learned the law, and hast kept the faith, and hast believed in Jesus, and hast known the decad, and hast believed  in the iota which is the first letter of the name of Jesus, and art named after His name, and art established, and shinest in the consummation of His glory. Those which were then the sacrifices now are prayers, and intercessions, and thanksgivings. Those which were then first-fruits, and tithes, and offerings, and gifts, now are oblations, which are presented by holy bishops to the Lord God, through Jesus Christ, who has died for them. For these are your high priests, as the presbyters are your priests, and your present deacons instead of your Levites; as are also your readers, your singers, your porters, your deaconesses, your widows, your virgins, and your orphans: but He who is above all these is the High Priest.

According to What Patterns and Dignity Every Order of the Clergy Is Appointed  by God.

XXVI. The bishop, he is the minister of the word, the keeper of knowledge, the mediator between God trod you in the several parts of your divine worship. He is the teacher of piety; and, next after God, he is your father, who has  begotten you again to the adoption of sons by water and the Spirit. He is your ruler and governor; he is your king and potentate; he is, next after God, your earthly god, who has a right to be honoured by you. For concerning him, arid such as he, it is that God pronounces, "I have said, You are gods; and you are all children of the Most High." And, "You shall not speak evil of the gods." For let the bishop preside over you as one honoured with the authority of God, which he is to exercise over the clergy, and by which he is to govern all the people. But let the deacon minister to him, as Christ does to His Father; and let him serve him unblameably in all things, as Christ does nothing of Himself, but does always those things that please His Father. Let also the deaconess be honoured by you in the place of the Holy Ghost,  and not do or say anything without the deacon;  as neither does the Comforter say or do anything  of Himself, but gives glory to Christ by waiting for His pleasure. And as we cannot believe on Christ without the teaching of the Spirit, so let not any woman address herself to the deacon or  bishop without the deaconess. Let the presbyters  be esteemed by you to represent us the apostles, and let them be the teachers of divine knowledge; since our Lord, when He sent us, said,  "Go you, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you." Let the widows and orphans be esteemed as representing the altar of burnt-offering; and let the virgins be honoured as representing the altar of incense, and the incense itself.”  >>

(APOSTOLIC CONSTITUTIONS, a.k.a. The Constitutions of the Holy Apostles, Book II, Of Bishops, Presbyters, and Deacons, Section  IV, On the Management of the Resources Collected for the Support of the Clergy, and the Relief of the Poor, Chapters 25-26.)

c. 300 A.D. - 324 A.D.

<<  THAT THE DEACON MUST NOT DO ANYTHING WITHOUT THE BISHOP.

XXXI ....For He did not make that law concerning deities of wood and of stone, which are abominable, because they are falsely called gods, but concerning the priests and the judges, to whom He also said, "You are gods, and children of the Most High."  >>

(APOSTOLIC CONSTITUTIONS, Book II, Of Bishops, Presbyters, and Deacons, Section  IV, On the Management of the Resources Collected for the Support of the Clergy, and the Relief of the Poor, That the Deacon must Not Do Anything Without the Bishop, Chapter 31.)

c. 390 A.D.

<<  "For as by the disobedience of the one man who was first formed from rude earth the many were made sinners and lost their life, so also was it fitting that through obedience of one man, the firstborn of a virgin, many should be made just and receive their salvation."

Of the same from the same work:

"'I have said you are gods and all of you children of the Most High but ye shall die like man.' This He says to them that did not accept the gift of adoption, but dishonor the incarnation of the pure generation of the word of God, deprive man of his ascent to God, and are ungrateful to the Word of God who for their sakes was made flesh. For this cause was the word made man that man receiving the word and accepting the adoption should be made God's son." >>

(Bishop Theodoret , a.k.a. Theodoretus (“Given by God”) of Cyrus, a.k.a. Cyros, or Cyrrhos, in Syria [b. at Antioch, Syria c. 390 A.D. - d. 457 A.D.], Bishop of Cyrus, a.k.a. Cyros, or Cyrrhos, in Syria [c. 423 A.D. - 457 A.D.], DIALOGUES - The “Eranistes” or “Polymorphus”, Dialogue I -  The Immutable, Testimony of Irenæus, Bishop of Lyons, from his third book - Against the Heresies).

John 10:34
Another Scriptural Basis for Pope Idolatry

<<  32   Jesus answered them:  Many good works I have shewed you from my Father; for which of these works do you stone me?
33   The Jews answered him:  For a good work we stone thee not, but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, maketh thyself God.
34   Jesus answered them:  Is it not written in your law:  I said you are gods?
35   If he called them gods, to whom to word of God was spoken, and the scripture cannot be broken;
36   Do you say of him whom the Father hath sanctified and sent into the world:  Thou blasphemest, because I said, I am the Son of God?
37   If I do not the works of my Father, believe me not.
38   But if I do, though you will not believe me, believe the works:  that you may know and believe that the Father is in me, and I in the Father.
39   They sought therefore to take him; and he escaped out of their hands.  >>

(Tatian the Assyrian [b. in Assyria in 110 A.D. - d., probably in Assyria in 172 A.D.], Diatessaron, a.k.a. Tatiani Evangeliorum Harmonioe, Arabice [A harmony of the four Gospels containing, in a continuous narrative, the principle events in the life of Our Lord], Section XXXVII,  John 10:32-39.)

How the Scriptural “You are gods”
Was Used to make Only the Pope into a “god”!

This position of Ours, based upon solid historical Truth, is not some convoluted conundrum locked into the mind by the penumbra of dialectics like the multi-chambered nautilus, or the quarry slave at night, scourged to his dungeon, or the embarrassed egomaniac with but a small, badly stained, canvas napkin which was jaggedly cut from the drapery of false erudition, instead of having the accustomed luxury of the drapery of a humble, sincere, yet erudite reason that used to hang so fair on his couch to wrap about him with its warm and peacefully ordered logic, not to mention the requisite services of a Gunga Din at a Bacchanalia of the vinegar of that piteously apprehensive cry - “A horse!  A horse!  My kingdom for a horse!” - which is scarce heard amid the din of the cacophony of brainwashed minds chained to the oars as the slivers of ignorance impale the calloused hands hardened less than their hearts are hardened against the Truth while the monotonous drum beat of the rhythmic drummer, above which a raven sits atop a bust of Pallas, the face of which wreathes in despair at the sight of the seated gullible, and becomes Ulysses’ Sirens’ seductive song, that interminable mantra “He’s my Pope.  He can do no wrong!”, of which coquet those enamored by the Papal tiara are an easy prey, as the obdurate oars continue to ply the River Lethe by which reason the intellect is so bathed that the last vestige of Truth may flicker as the flame of a candle in the wind of a pompous falsity astride a titanic locust  which is like unto those horses prepared unto battle and on their heads were, as it were, crowns like gold and their faces were as the faces of men but inwardly were as the faces in “They Live!”, but rather calls a spade a spade as its ontological essence exudes the purity and simplicity of Truth in humility, meekness, fortitude, and with a zeal for the Greater Honor and Glory of God and the Salvation of Immortal Souls.

With great sadness, and without even one exception, every single person We have ever met, irregardless the ecclesiastical rank or title such a person had at the time We met each one, which includes that of Patriarch/Archbishop-Major, Primate, Cardinal, Metropolitan Archbishop, Archbishop, Bishop, Right Reverend Monsignor, Priest, Religious, or Laity, does not know the history of the Catholic Church, nor the history of the “Roman” Catholic Church, and many of the Laity know next to nothing about the history of the infamous Satanic Vatican 2 church!  WHY?!

Lamentably, although incongruent at first read to its original context due to a different subject matter, the modern penchant for the revision of Ecclesiastical History as recognized in the rewriting of “History, and especially Church History, has been a grand CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE TRUTH.  WE FIRMLY BELIEVE THAT THIS STATEMENT IS SCARCELY AN EXAGGERATION” (Archbishop Martin John Spalding [b. at Bardstown, Kentucky on Wednesday, May 23, 1810 A.D. - d. at Baltimore, Maryland on Wednesday, February 7, 1872 A.D.], Bishop of Louisville , Kentucky [1850 - 1864], seventh Archbishop of Baltimore, Maryland [1864 - Wednesday, February 7, 1872], quoted in A GENERAL HISTORY OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH by M. L'Abbe J.E. Darras, “Introduction”, Vol. I, p. xiii, emphasis added) has created a world of victims thrown into the black hole of deliberate falsity and error so that the powers that be, greatly consternated that the Catholic Faithful will somehow even accidentally discover the real historical Truths, can only begin to maintain their status quo with revised Church Histories and the teaching of that proverbial “learned ignorance” to which the Apostle adroitly alludes.

Therefore, this explains in part WHY We try to bring forth the various fruits of Our many, many years of research into the fonts of authentic Church History to which sources, becoming fewer and fewer with the passage of time due to the attrition factor of books wearing out or being burned or thrown into the garbage heap along with altars, crucifixes, statues, sick call sets, holy relics, Mass vestments, etc., etc., etc. - as witnessed in the aftermath of the take-over of the “Roman” Catholic Church by the Satanic Vatican 2 church - almost all of the “Roman” Catholic Faithful today no longer have any access, even among the most scholarly among them.

Unfortunately, the revision of Church History is not a modern phenomena.  Historical precedents can be found.  For example, consider how in about the year 1075 A.D. one discovers the deliberate falsification of Ancient Church History about which We have written in Our copyrighted book:

“The correction of history was to some extent provided for in Germany by the monk Bernold, and in Italy by the zealous Gregorian Bonizo, Bishop of Piacenza, who tried, among other things, to get rid of the coronation of Charles the Great. 599  [Endnote 599 is found in Our book.] Their other assistants had to invent or adapt historical facts for party purposes, for their new codes of Church Law innovated largely on ancient Church History.” 600  [Endnote 600 is found in Our book.]

“It is ironic and somewhat amusing how all of the conniving done by Pope Leo III  [Tuesday, December 26, 795 - Sunday, June 12, 816], was now an embarrassment to the very Papacy which had profited so much from it!  One reads that ‘Pope Leo III (reigned 795-816), in turn, laid the foundation for the medieval German empire’ [Holy Roman Empire] ‘when he crowned Charlemagne in Saint Peter’s Basilica on [Monday,] December 25, 800.’”  601  [Endnote 601 is found in Our book.]

“The Gregorian/Hildebrandine Papal School of Forgers  [1049 A.D. - c. 1118 A.D.] considered it necessary ‘to get rid of the coronation of Charles the Great’ [i.e., Charlemagne], ‘among other things.’ The researcher goes on to tell you how ‘their other assistants had to invent or adapt historical facts for party purposes, for their new codes of Church Law innovated largely on ancient Church History.’”

(Jacobus Maria DeJesus, C.M.F., D.D., “SECRET 2:  How the Bishop of Rome Became the Pope of Rome and How the Pope of Rome Has Remained the Pope of Rome,”  ¶ 620 -  ¶ 622, p. 183.)

Only the Pope is a “god”

Leaving no doubts about how some of the early Fathers of the Catholic Church used Psalm 81, verse 6, especially “You are gods”, and, including their interpretation - when given - of what it means, now it is necessary to consider how you get from the Scriptural “You are gods” to Only the Pope is a “god” with its obvious concomitant Pope idolatry!

You may recall reading above: "You shall not speak evil of the gods." (APOSTOLIC CONSTITUTIONS, a.k.a. The Constitutions of the Holy Apostles, Book II, Of Bishops, Presbyters, and Deacons, Section  IV, On the Management of the Resources Collected for the Support of the Clergy, and the Relief of the Poor, Chapter 26.)?

The proverbial “fish story” is akin to what the Roman Emperor Constantine I was alleged to have said about the Bishop of Rome, a.k.a. Pope for Roman Catholics, and how this stink of falsity took on a life of its own being exaggerated more and more (the fish gets bigger and bigger every time the story is told!), until it turns into the claim that Constantine I said something in 325 A.D. which he did not say - something to the effect that “Only the Pope is a ‘god’!”

And so it came about in 370 A.D. that what Constantine I had said had been interpolated into Constantine I saying something to the effect that “Only the Pope is a ‘god’!”

How did this come about?  We present a few brief paragraphs from Our copyrighted book “SECRET 2:  How the Bishop of Rome Became the Pope of Rome and How the Pope of Rome Has Remained the Pope of Rome.”

“In the same way a saying ascribed to Constantine, at the Council of Nice, in a legend recorded by Rufinus, 189  was amplified till it was fashioned into a perfect mine of high-flying pretensions.  Constantine, according to this fable, when the written accusations of the bishops against each other were laid before him, burned them, saying, in allusion to a verse in the Psalter, that the bishops were gods, and no man could dare to judge them.”

[Endnote 189: “Rufinus [b.  ? - d. 395 A.D.] was a Roman statesman and a minister to the Roman Emperor, Theodosius I (the Great), a.k.a. Flavius Theodosius [b. in Spain, c. 346 A.D. - d. Milan, Tuesday, January 17, 395 A.D.].  After the death of Theodosius I in 395 A.D., Rufinus became the real ruler in the East because the Eastern Emperor, Arcadius [b. c. 377 A.D.- d. 408 A.D.], was a weak ruler.  Rufinus was assassinated by Gothic mercenaries, possibly on the orders of Flavius Stilicho [b. c. 365 A.D. - d. 408 A.D.], a Roman general who defended the Western part of the Roman Empire from the Goths and Vandals, in 395 A.D.”]

“Nicholas I quoted this to the Emperor Michael. 190 [Endnote 190 will be found in the book.].  Anselm adopted the story into his collection, Gratian followed, and Gregory himself found in it clear evidence that he, the Pope, the bishop of bishops, stood in unapproachable majesty over all monarchs of the earth.  For, as the passage stood in Anselm and Gratian, it was the Pope whom Constantine called a god 191 [Endnote 191 will be found in the book.], and so it has been understood and explained ever since. 192 193 [Endnotes 192, 193 will be found in Our book.]”

In Our Commentary on this interpolation We wrote in part:

“Certain people, puffed up by pride, are frequently said to have a god image of themselves.  In the process of ‘How the Bishop of Rome Became the Pope of Rome’, no pebble was left unturned by certain promoters. This certainly has been true of some Popes themselves.  One such pebble has to do with the Roman Emperor Constantine.  Constantine, according to this fable, when the written accusations of the Bishops against each other were laid before him, burned them, saying, in allusion to a verse of the Psalter, that the Bishops were gods, and no man could dare to judge them.”

Departing briefly from Our Book, SECRET 2, since We wrote the above, Our continued research seems to indicate that there is a strong probability that the Roman Emperor Constantine I was in fact familiar with at least part of the forgery known as the APOSTOLIC CONSTITUTIONS.  For example, in Book II, Section  IV, Chapter 26, this text is found: “You shall not speak evil of the gods."

IF in fact this is true, when the written accusations of the Bishops against each other were laid before him, probably a few days or a few weeks after he formally opened the First Council of Nicæa, Nicæa I, on Saturday, June 20, 325 A.D., it would have been logical for Constantine I to have either quoted this text saying:  “You shall not speak evil of the gods", or to have paraphrased this text saying something similar to it, e.g. “ The Bishops are gods, and no man can dare to judge them.”

To return to Our book, We also wrote in part:

“Whether or not this actually happened is certainly open to debate.  But that convoluted episode was taken to extremes, especially by certain Popes, e.g. ‘Nicholas I, quoted this to the Emperor Michael.’”

“Never to be outdone by his predecessors in the god image of themselves department, the dean of the Gregorian/Hildebrandine Papal School of Forgers  [1049 A.D. - c. 1118 A.D.]  never let down his students or followers concerning the subject of Papal Primacy, especially within the context of the Pope being a living ‘god’. So, with no surprise, ‘Gregory VII himself found in the saying ascribed to Constantine, at the First Council of Nicæa in 325 A.D., clear evidence that he, the Pope, the bishop of bishops, stood in unapproachable majesty over all monarchs of the earth.’ Thanks to the Gregorian/Hildebrandine Papal School of Forgers  [1049 A.D. - c. 1118 A.D.], this interpolation has been chiseled into the ‘pebble’, a.k.a. ‘rock’, so to speak, of whom some regard as the successor of Saint Peter, 194 especially by Anselm who, using the ‘legend recorded by Rufinus’ from about 370 A.D., ‘adopted the story into his collection’ of Church Law in 1086 A.D., namely, that ‘it was the Pope whom Constantine called a “god”, and so it has been understood and explained ever since.’  Of course ‘Gratian followed’ the Gregorian/Hildebrandine Papal School of Forgers  [1049 A.D. - c. 1118 A.D.] and inserted it into his collection of Church Law in 1152 A.D.”

[Endnote 194:  “There has been some controversy as to WHO was the first Bishop of Rome; whether it was Saint Peter, Saint Paul or someone else.  It IS known for certain that Saint Peter was the Bishop of Antioch, although one tradition says that both Saint Peter and his wife were martyred on Vatican hill in Rome in the same year and on the same day on which Saint Paul was also martyred at Rome.”]

“It is interesting and amusing how Papal Primacy and Papal Infallibility 195  are in such desperate need of proofs that their promoters have had to rely on this interpolation of a saying of Constantine. Thus the weakness of part of the basis of these two ‘dogmas’ of the ‘Roman’ Catholic Church and the Vatican 2 church is clearly apparent in its flimsiness!  Of course, Vatican propaganda machines have become more sophisticated since Gregory 7th so that now this interpolation of Constantine, while not seriously quoted, is still part of the mentality at work to supply cohesion and consistency to ‘How the Bishop of Rome Became the Pope of Rome’.”

[Endnote 195:  “For more information on this subject, please refer to Our book entitled SECRET 5: The Twin Heresies of Papal Primacy and Papal Infallibility.”]   (Jacobus Maria DeJesus, C.M.F., D.D., “SECRET 2:  How the Bishop of Rome Became the Pope of Rome and How the Pope of Rome Has Remained the Pope of Rome,”  ¶ 178 -  ¶ 183, pp. 87-88.)

Cogency

Some readers might be wont to take the position that those who believe that Only the Pope is a “god”, no matter how true it might be, does not constitute a basis for idolatry?

On the contrary, this interpolation of Constantine, while not seriously quoted today, is still part of the mentality at work today to supply cohesion and consistency to “How the Bishop of Rome Became the Pope of Rome”.

Yet an even greater concern is how and when this mentality has been applied in the past and especially by WHOM!  In other words, has ANY “infallible” pope ever made use of this interpolation of Constantine, namely that “Only the Pope is a ‘god’!”??

DICTATUS PAPÆ
A Litany of Despotism
A Theory of Tyranny

In searching the histories of the popes, one discovers in the year 1075 A.D. what is called the DICTATUS PAPÆ - The Dictates of the Pope, which was written by the “infallible” pope of the “Roman” Catholic Church - a drum roll please with the sound of a hundred trumpets to emphasize his great importance as the Master Forger par excellence - the one, the only, that incomparable  Pope - “god”  - the Benedictine monk and homuncio, Hildebrand of Soana, Italy, a.k.a., His Holiness,  “god” Pope Gregory 7th [Tuesday, April 22, 1073 - Monday, May 25, 1085]!

For those of you who might not be familiar with them, below please find, in all of their “god” glory, each Theory of Tyranny penned by no other Pope “god” than His Holiness, “god” Pope Gregory 7th.

 1.  “That the Roman church was founded by God alone.
   2.  That the Roman pontiff alone can with right be called universal.
   3.  That he alone can depose or reinstate bishops.
   4.  That, in a council his legate, even if a lower grade, is above all bishops, and can pass sentence of deposition against them.
   5.  That the pope may depose the absent.
   6.  That, among other things, we ought not to remain in the same house with those excommunicated by him.
 7.  That for him alone is it lawful, according to the needs of the time, to make new laws, to assemble together new congregations, to make an abbey of a canonry; and, on the other hand, to divide a rich bishopric and unite the poor ones.
   8.  That he alone may use the imperial insignia.
   9.  That of the pope alone all princes shall kiss the feet.
   10.  That his name alone shall be spoken in the churches.
   11.  That this is the only name in the world.
   12.  That it may be permitted to him to depose emperors.
   13.  That he may be permitted to transfer bishops if need be.
   14.  That he has power to ordain a clerk of any church he may wish.
   15.  That he who is ordained by him may preside over another church, but may not hold a subordinate position; and that such a one may not receive a higher grade from any bishop.
   16.  That no synod shall be called a general one without his order.
 17.  That no chapter and no book shall be considered canonical without his authority.
   18.  That a sentence passed by him may be retracted by no one; and that he himself, alone of all, may retract it.
   19.  That he himself may be judged by no one.
   20.  That no one shall dare to condemn one who appeals to the apostolic chair.
   21.  That to the latter should be referred the more important cases of every church.
   22.  That the Roman church has never erred; nor will it err to all eternity, the Scripture bearing witness.
   23.  That the Roman pontiff, if he have been canonically ordained, is undoubtedly made a saint by the merits of Saint Peter; Saint Ennodius, bishop of Pavia, bearing witness, and many holy fathers agreeing with him.  As is contained in the decrees of Saint Symmachus the pope.
   24.  That, by his command and consent, it may be lawful for subordinates to bring accusations.
   25.  That he may depose and reinstate bishops without assembling a synod.